{
  "fields": [{"type":"int","id":"_id"},{"info":{"notes":"","type_override":"numeric","label":""},"type":"numeric","id":"Comment ID"},{"info":{"notes":"","type_override":"timestamp","label":""},"type":"timestamp","id":"Date"},{"info":{"notes":"","type_override":"","label":""},"type":"text","id":"Commentary"}],
  "records": [
    [1,1,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","Most people use Jersey's roads every day, as drivers, passengers, cyclists and pedestrians and they should be able to do so safely. This indicator tracks the number of collisions in which people are either killed or seriously injured (as defined by national police recording rules). This is the most reliable measure because such incidents are the most likely to be reported to the police. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time.\nResearch of incidents over the last decade showed that about 20% to 25% of serious injuries each year are deemed life-threatening or life-changing.\nWhile Jersey's roads are safer today than 20 years ago, it has proved difficult to achieve a consistent reduction in crashes resulting in serious injury over the last decade.\n2023 saw a decrease in the rate of serious road traffic collisions resulting in serious injury per 1,000 population, from 0.59 per 1,000 in 2022 to 0.48 in 2023.\n"],
    [2,2,"2023-07-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator combines data from the States of Jersey Fire and Rescue Service on the number of fires in Jersey with demographic data to produce a rate of fires per 1,000 population. It tracks fire safety in Jersey over time while taking into account the effects of a growing population. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n\n\n2023 saw a steady increase in the number of fires per 1,000 population, from 1.40 per 1,000 in 2020 to 1.80.\n\n"],
    [3,4,"2023-07-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator counts the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance (STIA) benefit claims for full time equivalent (FTE) employees received by the Customer and Local Services department for work-related injuries or ill-health each year. It does not provide a full picture of all work-related accidents and ill-health as not all incidents result in benefit claims, but it offers an independent, reliable insight into key trends in work-related injuries and ill-health. Dividing the total number of claims by FTE employees takes into account the impact of a changing workforce size. The FTE figure is a weighted average for the calendar year produced by Statistics Jersey, which takes into account both full-time and part-time employees.\nThe number of claims reduced steadily up until about 2013 from when it has remained reasonably stable."],
    [4,5,"2023-07-31T00:00:00","Community safety is not just about crime reported to, and recorded by, the police. It is also about whether people feel safe, which is why this indicator focuses on public perceptions of safety. It uses data collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which asks a representative sample of adults about the safety of their neighbourhoods in order to build a picture of community safety across the whole Island. Respondents are asked: 'How safe or unsafe do you consider your neighbourhood to be (within five minutes’ walk of your home)' and can answer: very safe; fairly safe; a bit unsafe; very unsafe; or, don't know. Overall perceptions of safety (very safe and fairly safe) are so high in Jersey that this indicator focuses on the percentage of respondents who say very safe to allow scope for improvement.\nOverall in 2023, 90% of Islanders said their neighbourhood is very safe or fairly safe with 52% recording a very safe response. The proportion who say very safe has decreased from 63% in 2022 to 52% in 2023.\n"],
    [5,6,"2023-07-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Schools Survey, which is open to all pupils in Years 6, 8, 10 and 12. Respondents are asked if they have been bullied at or near school in the last 12 months. This indicator tracks the proportion of children in Years 6, 8 and 10 who say they have been bullied.\nOver the last decade, about one in four children in Years 6, 8 and 10 have consistently reported being afraid of going to school at least sometimes because of bullying. This is consistent with the proportion who report being bullied. The proportion of children who report being afraid 'often' or 'very often' has also remained at about 5%. Of children who reported having been bullied, 51% said their school usually or always took bullying seriously compared to 68% of children who hadn't been bullied."],
    [6,10,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","This measure, taken from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS), represents a combination of two information security assessment questions: 'Risk awarness' and 'Confidence to manage risks'. The resulting scores are combined via a risk matrix.\nIn 2025, the proportion of adults with high or very high information  security vulnerability was 49%."],
    [7,19,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This value is taken from responses to Jersey Children and Young People’s Survey (JCYPS) set of questions: \"How often spend time with parents\" (Score: Daily 5; weekly 4; monthly 3; less than monthly 2; never 1) and the median score of parental relationship matrix question : strongly agree = 5; agree = 4; don’t know = 3; disagree = 2; strongly disagree = 1.\nIn 2024, 76% of young people scored high (4 or 5) levels of parental time spent and relationship."],
    [8,11,"2023-07-31T00:00:00","The global public health recommendation is that infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life to achieve optimal growth, development and health, before starting mixed feeding alongside ongoing breastfeeding, where possible. This indicator uses data from the 6 to 8 week development assessment by GPs, to track breastfeeding rates. Across different local authorities in England, breastfeeding rates vary between 21% and 80%. Such variation is not just down to personal choice; it is also about personal and societal circumstances. This indicator helps promote a dialogue about barriers that might prevent mothers in Jersey from breastfeeding and supports the evaluation of different interventions over time.\n\nThe percentage of mothers who are breastfeeding (either fully or partially) at 6 - 8 weeks has dropped back to a similar level as in 2021, after a 5% increase in the previous year.\n"],
    [9,21,"2023-07-31T00:00:00","This indicator uses the total amount of pure alcohol sold in Jersey each year to calculate the volume of alcohol consumed per resident aged 15 years or older (accounting for tourists and seasonal workers) for comparison with the United Kingdom and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries.\nIn 2022, Jersey’s mean average per capita consumption was 12 litres of pure alcohol per person aged 15 or older. The level of per capita consumption has remained fairly constant over recent years after a steady reduction from 2000 to 2013 . The current level of consumption equates to approximately 2.6 bottles of wine or 8.1 pints of strong beer or over half a bottle of spirits per week and is in excess of the NHS current recommended guidelines of 14 units per week (approximately 1.6 bottles of wine or 5 pints of strong beer)."],
    [10,22,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how often they smoke cigarettes and are given a range of options from never to daily. This indicator monitors the proportion of adults who currently smoke, either daily or occasionally (not including e-cigarettes).\nOverall, Jersey has seen a significant reduction in the proportion of the population who smoke from 25% in 2005 down to 15% in 2019. The proportion of adults who reported that they had never smoked has also significantly increased over this period, from 45% in 2005 to 53% in 2020. Consistent with the decline in reported smoking, the volume of tobacco imported into Jersey has reduced significantly over time, down by nearly 40% between 2013 and 2019. Imports dropped by over 19% in 2019 alone.\nIn 2023, the proportion of people who reported smoking at least occasionally was 14% only slightly higher that the low of 13% in 2021.\n"],
    [11,26,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","In many countries, including the UK, Germany, France and the USA, people are recommended to eat five or more portions of fruit and vegetables each day. Data on local consumption is gathered through the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults. Respondents are asked 'how many portions of fruit or vegetables did you eat yesterday'. Responses are categorised into: 0 portions; 1-4 portions; and, 5+ portions (equal to or above the NHS recommended level).\nIn 2023, only 32% of Jersey adults reported having eaten five or more fruit or vegetable portions the previous day and this percentage has been fairly similar over the period 2013 to 2021.\nIn the UK, 29% of adults report meeting the guidelines but, again, the proportion has not changed over time."],
    [12,26,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","In many countries, including the UK, Germany, France and the USA, people are recommended to eat five or more portions of fruit and vegetables each day. Data on local consumption is gathered through the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults. Respondents are asked 'how many portions of fruit or vegetables did you eat yesterday'. Responses are categorised into: 0 portions; 1-4 portions; and, 5+ portions (equal to or above the NHS recommended level).\nIn 2025, only 31% of Jersey adults reported having eaten five or more fruit or vegetable portions the previous day. In the UK, 29% of adults report meeting the guidelines but, again, the proportion has not changed over time."],
    [13,27,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS), which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how many times in a typical week they do at least moderate activity for 30 minutes or longer. The indicator tracks the proportion of adults whose reported levels of physical activity meet national guidelines.\nBetween 2012 and 2017, questions on physical activity were included on a regular basis in the annual social surveys. The results showed that just over 50% of adults reported meeting recommended levels of physical activity. In 2019, the survey question was changed so it is not possible to compare the results and a new trendline will be started. Notwithstanding this change, the results remain relatively consistent with 51% of Jersey adults reporting in 2019 that they do at least the equivalent of 150 minutes of moderate exercise per week. This had increased to 55% by 2023."],
    [14,27,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS), which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how many times in a typical week they do at least moderate activity for 30 minutes or longer. The indicator tracks the proportion of adults whose reported levels of physical activity meet national guidelines.\nBetween 2012 and 2017, questions on physical activity were included on a regular basis in the annual social surveys. The results showed that just over 50% of adults reported meeting recommended levels of physical activity. In 2019, the survey question was changed so it is not possible to compare the results and a new trendline will be started. Notwithstanding this change, the results remain relatively consistent with 51% of Jersey adults reporting in 2019 that they do at least the equivalent of 150 minutes of moderate exercise per week.\nThe percentage of Islanders who met the recommended level of physical activity in 2025 was 54%."],
    [15,28,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","\nMulti-morbidity is commonly defined as the presence of two or more chronic medical conditions in a patient. These are conditions that currently have no cure, and may be managed with drugs and other treatment. As populations age, the level of multi-morbidity is likely to increase, which will have implications for health and social care provision. GPs record patients with 12 long-term conditions as part of the Jersey Quality Improvement Framework (JQIF). These conditions are a good basis for multi-morbidity analysis and they are agreed amongst clinicians as being important. They are: atrial fibrillation; asthma; coronary heart disease; chronic kidney disease; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; dementia; diabetes; heart failure; hypertension; mental health problems; obesity; stroke and transient ischemic attack. There are now 12 long-term conditions reported (we no longer include Cancer as part of JQIF).\nThese values were recalculated in 2023 using the updated population estimates produced earlier that year.\n"],
    [16,31,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator is used internationally to measure and compare quality of life. The data is gathered from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents score themselves between zero and ten in answer to the question: ‘Overall, how satisfied are you with your life nowadays’, with zero being not at all satisfied and ten being completely satisfied. The indicator counts those who score seven or more as a % of total responses. Before 2017, a different version of the question was used but Jersey's results can now be compared directly with those produced in the UK and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.\nIn 2023, the proportion of adults reporting high levels of life satisfaction was 66% - up from the result in 2020 (64%). Both scores are significantly below the 82% recorded in 2018.\n"],
    [17,31,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator is used internationally to measure and compare quality of life. The data is gathered from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents score themselves between zero and ten in answer to the question: ‘Overall, how satisfied are you with your life nowadays’, with zero being not at all satisfied and ten being completely satisfied. The indicator counts those who score seven or more as a % of total responses. Before 2017, a different version of the question was used but Jersey's results can now be compared directly with those produced in the UK and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.\nIn 2025, the proportion of adults reporting high levels of life satisfaction was 68% - up from the result in 2023 (66%). Both scores are significantly below the 82% recorded in 2018.\n"],
    [18,32,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","The life experience of people with a disability can be very different from those without a disability. They can face barriers in accessing services that many take for granted, including health, education, employment, and transport. The research for the 2017 Disability Strategy highlighted how such challenges contribute to significant differences in life satisfaction between disabled Islanders and the rest of the population. This indicator uses data from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey, to track how this gap in life satisfaction changes over time.\nThe survey asks respondents to score themselves between 0 to 10 in answer to the question: ‘Overall, how satisfied are you with your life nowadays’, with zero being not at all satisfied and ten being completely satisfied. This indicator focuses on the difference in the percentage of the population with a high life satisfaction (7 to 10) between (a) Islanders with a long-term condition that affects their daily lives and (b) the rest of the population.\nFor adults without a long-standing condition that affects their day-to-day lives, 71% scored their life satisfaction as 7 or more out of 10. The equivalent for those with a long-term condition that affects their day-to-day lives was 50%. Hence, the gap would be 21%. In 2023, the gap was 27%, this is a return to pre 2020 levels after a reduction in 2022."],
    [19,32,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","The life experience of people with a disability can be very different from those without a disability. They can face barriers in accessing services that many take for granted, including health, education, employment, and transport. The research for the 2017 Disability Strategy highlighted how such challenges contribute to significant differences in life satisfaction between disabled Islanders and the rest of the population. This indicator uses data from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey, to track how this gap in life satisfaction changes over time.\nThe survey asks respondents to score themselves between 0 to 10 in answer to the question: ‘Overall, how satisfied are you with your life nowadays’, with zero being not at all satisfied and ten being completely satisfied. This indicator focuses on the difference in the percentage of the population with a high life satisfaction (7 to 10) between (a) Islanders with a long-term condition that affects their daily lives and (b) the rest of the population.\nIn 2025, the gap was 19% - this is the lowest since the records began, in 2017."],
    [20,33,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked ‘How do you rate the range of cultural events, attractions and activities available in Jersey', and can answer: very good; good; poor; or, very poor. The indicator is calculated by adding the number of very good and good responses, and dividing by the total responses.\nIn 2023, 55% of adults rated Jersey’s cultural events, attractions and activities as good (50%) or very good (10%) in 2023. This is significantly lower than the proportion of Islanders rating either social and recreational (83%) or sporting events, attractions and activities (87%) as good or very good.\nYoung people were less likely to rate the existing cultural offer as highly as older people and only 48% of people aged 16 to 34 years rated it as good or very good, compared to 69% of people aged 65+ years."],
    [21,34,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked ‘How do you rate the range of sporting events and activities available in Jersey', and can answer: very good; good; poor; or, very poor. The indicator is calculated by adding the number of very good and good responses, and dividing by the total responses.\n\nIn 2022 77% of adults rated Jersey’s sporting events and activities as either good or very good. A breakdown of the overall figures for 2022 shows that 56% of Islanders rated sporting events and activities as good and 21% said very good.\n"],
    [22,35,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","Volunteering is widely used as a measure of community engagement and social connections because of its importance in increasing social cohesion and improving quality of life. Volunteers create, support and sustain organisations that provide vital services in areas, such as social and health care, help community sport, recreation, arts and culture thrive, and play an integral part in protecting and enhancing Jersey's natural environment. This indicator uses data from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. \nIn 2022, 35% of respondents reported having done some volunteering in the last 12 months. This is a decrease from 2019 when 43% of adults had volunteered and could be an effect of the pandemic. The age group 16 to 34 year-olds were the least likely to have volunteered in the previous 12 months: 28% had volunteered compared to 41% of 55 to 64 year-olds. The proportion of adults who volunteered in the area of religion / church differed by age: 2% of 16 to 34 year-olds had volunteered in this area compared to 13% of 65 years and over.\n"],
    [23,35,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","Volunteering is widely used as a measure of community engagement and social connections because of its importance in increasing social cohesion and improving quality of life. Volunteers create, support and sustain organisations that provide vital services in areas, such as social and health care, help community sport, recreation, arts and culture thrive, and play an integral part in protecting and enhancing Jersey's natural environment. This indicator uses data from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. \nIn 2025, 44% of respondents reported having done some volunteering in the last 12 months.\n"],
    [24,36,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","This data was collected via the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey, respondents are asked whether they consider that they have been discriminated against on a variety of grounds including age, race and gender in the previous 12 months. In jurisdictions worldwide, it is taken for granted that people should be protected against discrimination. The data provided by this indicator supported the roll-out of new legal protections against discrimination in Jersey from 2014. It is not realistic to expect all discrimination to be formally reported, so this indicator complements official case records to help understand the scale of the problem and the impact of efforts to address the issue over time. \nThe 2022 survey results showed a decrease in perceived discrimination compared to 2019. \n"],
    [25,36,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","This data was collected via the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey, respondents are asked whether they consider that they have been discriminated against on a variety of grounds including age, race and gender in the previous 12 months. In jurisdictions worldwide, it is taken for granted that people should be protected against discrimination. The data provided by this indicator supported the roll-out of new legal protections against discrimination in Jersey from 2014. It is not realistic to expect all discrimination to be formally reported, so this indicator complements official case records to help understand the scale of the problem and the impact of efforts to address the issue over time. \nThe 2025 survey results showed a decrease in perceived discrimination compared to 2019 - down to 23%.\n"],
    [26,37,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator uses the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey, to monitor social isolation. Respondents are asked: 'How often do you socialise (face-to-face) with people outside of your household', and can answer: daily; weekly; monthly; rarely; or, never. This indicator measures the proportion of people who say rarely or never.\nIn 2023, 7% of adults in Jersey rarely or never socialised face-to-face with people outside their own household. By comparison, more than 80% reported socialising face to face with people outside their own household at least weekly. \n"],
    [27,37,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator uses the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey, to monitor social isolation. Respondents are asked: 'How often do you socialise (face-to-face) with people outside of your household', and can answer: daily; weekly; monthly; rarely; or, never. This indicator measures the proportion of people who say rarely or never.\nThe proportion of adults who socialise rarely or never has increased from 6% in 2018 to 12% in 2025.\n"],
    [28,38,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","The Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS) asks a representative sample of Jersey adults to rate their 'trust' in the Government on a scale of 1-10, where 1 is don't trust at all, and 10 is trust completely. This score is a combination of the average JOLS scores for trust in (i) Government Departments and (ii) The States Assembly.\n\nThe average score of 5.1 in 2022 was an increase from 4.6 in 2019.\n"],
    [29,38,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","The Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS) asks a representative sample of Jersey adults to rate their 'trust' in the Government on a scale of 1-10, where 1 is don't trust at all, and 10 is trust completely. This score is a combination of the average JOLS scores for trust in (i) Government Departments and (ii) The States Assembly.\n\nThe average score of 5.3 in 2025 was an increase from 4.8 in 2024.\n"],
    [30,39,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Participants are asked 'How do you rate the range of the following leisure activities available in Jersey' and can rate social and recreational activities (bars, restaurants, social clubs, etc) as very good, good, poor or very poor. In 2022, 83% of respondents rated Jersey's range of social and recreational activities as good (58%) or very good (25%). This is consistent with the findings in 2013 and 2017. Given the high overall rating, the real opportunity for improvement lies in shifting the proportion of people who rate the social and recreational activities in Jersey as very good from its current level of 25%. In general, a smaller percentage of 16 to 34 year olds rated the leisure activities offered in Jersey as good or very good compared to older age groups.\n"],
    [31,41,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","This data was collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents were asked: 'Overall, how satisfied are you with your current housing' and can answer very satisfied; fairly satisfied; not very satisfied; or, not at all satisfied.\n\nIn 2022, 92% of Islanders were either fairly or very satisfied with their housing; 58% reported being very satisfied, and 34% fairly satisfied. The indicator deliberately focuses on the proportion who report being very satisfied as this provides scope for improvement.\n"],
    [32,42,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked: 'As a place to live, how satisfied are you with your local neighbourhood (within five minutes’ walk of your home)' They can choose from very satisfied; fairly satisfied; not very satisfied; or, not at all satisfied.\nIn 2022, 93% of adults reported being very or fairly satisfied with their neighbourhood, with 54% being very satisfied. This indicator deliberately focuses on tracking change in the very satisfied responses over time.\n"],
    [33,43,"2024-05-13T00:00:00","This indicator tracks traffic flow on the nine main routes into St Helier during the morning peak period for a typical winter morning, as recorded by automatic traffic counters. Since 2016 new monitoring equipment has been used in order to record the traffic flow more reliably.\n"],
    [34,44,"2024-05-13T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which is sent to a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked about their usual mode of transport to work. Walking, cycling and bus travel are all included as active modes of travel; the latter because research has shown that taking the bus involves more walking than taking the car. Increasing the proportion of Islanders who actively travel to work would help to ease peak hour traffic congestion, and have a positive impact on air quality, energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Active travel has also been shown to benefit people's physical and mental health, and would contribute towards improving St Helier as a place to live. It also supports affordable living by enabling households to make significant savings on transport costs.\nIn 2024, the overall proportion of Islanders using active forms of travel as their usual mode of transport to work was 41%. \n"],
    [35,44,"2025-05-13T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which is sent to a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked about their usual mode of transport to work. Walking, cycling and bus travel are all included as active modes of travel; the latter because research has shown that taking the bus involves more walking than taking the car. Increasing the proportion of Islanders who actively travel to work would help to ease peak hour traffic congestion, and have a positive impact on air quality, energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Active travel has also been shown to benefit people's physical and mental health, and would contribute towards improving St Helier as a place to live. It also supports affordable living by enabling households to make significant savings on transport costs.\nIn 2025, the overall proportion of Islanders using active forms of travel as their usual mode of transport to work was 41% - unchanged since previous year.\n"],
    [36,53,"2024-05-13T00:00:00","\nDespite its small size, Jersey contains an incredibly diverse range of natural habitats. The Island's geographical position, and favourable climate, has resulted in a mixture of British and European animals and plants, some of which can only be found in the Channel Islands. Jersey has made international commitments to conserve its species, habitats and ecosystems, for which the designation of Sites of Special Interest (SSI) is a vital component. Protecting the Island's natural environment also contributes significantly to Islanders' overall quality of life. Engaging with nature, for example, can benefit mental and physical wellbeing. This indicator covers the extent in hectares of protected areas above the mean high water level (where geological and ecological sites coincide, the land area is only counted once). The first ecological SSIs were designated in 1996 to satisfy the requirements of international conventions. To-date, 28 Sites of Special Ecological Interest and 22 Sites of Special Geological Interest have been designated. The total area covered, 548 hectares, equates to about 5% of Jersey's land area, and includes key habitats such as wetlands, woodland, hedgerows, maritime heath, coastal sand dunes and grassland. Only about 20% of Jersey’s key semi-natural habitats are protected by SSI designation, so a large area of critical natural habitat remains unprotected. Three new ecological SSIs, covering 17 hectares, were added along the coast of St Ouen's Bay at the beginning of 2020.\n"],
    [37,57,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator tracks the extent of the countryside access routes available to the public. The substantial feedback to the public consultation on the 2016 Countryside Access Strategy highlighted the value that Islanders place on such access. It encourages community engagement with the outdoors and raises levels of personal connectivity with the natural world and environmental awareness in its broadest sense. In addition, it provides for people's sporting, recreational and leisure needs.  Jersey has an extensive network of paths across public and private land in some of the Island’s most beautiful landscapes. The paths are used by an estimated 100,000 people a year, including locals and visitors and they help meet wider strategic agendas for improving physical and mental health and wellbeing while adding a significant economic value to our landscape. Access should be, safe, sustainable, and cost effective, with minimal impact on biodiversity. It should also be available to everyone. The strategy aims to improve access for all different user groups by providing multi-user paths, adding new routes, improving connectivity and resilience of the network.\n\n"],
    [38,61,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","The sustainable use of Jersey's water resources is essential to individual and community wellbeing, and for the protection of biodiversity and ecological systems. Islanders' water supplies rely largely on rainfall-dependent surface water, which is captured and stored in six main reservoirs. When full, they can provide about 120 days supply, based on current average daily demand. A desalination plant can boost this supply when rainfall levels are low, but can only meet about 50% of daily demand. Managing future demand will be essential and this indicator tracks the overall consumption of treated mains water per head of population. \n\nWater consumption per capita has reduced steadily from the 2016 rate of 73.7 thousand litres per capita to 65.4 thousand litres per capita in 2022.\n\n"],
    [39,63,"2024-05-13T00:00:00","This indicator measures Jersey's energy consumption in tonnes of oil equivalent (toe) which represents the quanity of energy released by burning one tonne of crude oil. More efficient energy use will help to protect households and businesses from the impact of increasing international energy prices, as well as reducing Jersey’s greenhouse gas emissions. In 2018, final energy consumption per person in Jersey was 2% higher than in 2017. However, over the five years from 2014 to 2018, consumption has been relatively flat at around 150,000 toe, acknowledging the effect of warmer or colder winters. FEC per capita in Jersey from 2017 to 2022, has mostly remained around 1.3/1.4 toe. In 2024, final energy consumption per person in Jersey has gradually decreased from 1.32 in 2022 to 1.27. Please note that from 2015 the mid year population estimates (from the Population & Migration Statistics Report 2011-2022) have been used to claculate this measure.\n"],
    [40,64,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","In March 2007, the UK's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol was extended to Jersey. The protocol requires Jersey to reduce its carbon emissions by 80% by 2050, relative to 1990 levels. This indicator tracks Jersey's performance in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), measured in kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (ktCOe). Jersey's GHG emissions rose from 628 ktCOe in 1990 to a peak in 1998 of 782 ktCOe. Over the next decade they reduced, thanks largely to the installation of subsea cables from France which enabled a reduction in local electricity generation using fuel oil. Please note that all back series have been updated due to methodology improvements made in line with the international best practice.\nIn 2021 Jersey emitted 369 ktCOe.\n"],
    [41,72,"2024-05-13T00:00:00","If fewer people can afford to buy their own home, or there is an insufficient supply of social housing, the private rented sector becomes their only viable housing option. In a pressured rental market, lower income households will be the worst affected. This can lead to overcrowding, poorer housing choices and growing demand for social housing or income support. This indicator uses an international definition of housing stress, which is the proportion of low income households that spend more than 30% of their income on rent. It focuses on low income households (those in the lowest 40% of the equivalised income distribution) because some higher earning households can afford to spend more than 30% of their non-equivalised income on rent. There are three main types of rental accommodation in Jersey: private rental for people with residential qualifications; unqualified private rental; and, social rental. This indicator focuses on private rental for people with residential qualifications, as this is the sector where the greatest proportion of households live in rental stress. This indicator uses data collected by the Jersey Household Income and Spending Survey, which is run every five years. The last report was published in 2023.\n"],
    [42,73,"2024-05-13T00:00:00","As well as considering the evidence on earnings, disposable income and relative low income, it is important to consider people's personal experience of making ends meet. This data is gathered using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS), which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked as a household, how easy or difficult they find it to cope financially and can answer: very easy; quite easy; neither easy nor difficult; quite difficult; or, very difficult. The indicator counts those who respond quite or very difficult as a proportion of total responses. The 2024 result showed an increase in the proportion of Jersey households reporting that they were finding it difficult to cope financially, from 31% in 2023 to 35% in 2024.\n"],
    [43,73,"2025-05-13T00:00:00","As well as considering the evidence on earnings, disposable income and relative low income, it is important to consider people's personal experience of making ends meet. This data is gathered using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS), which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked as a household, how easy or difficult they find it to cope financially and can answer: very easy; quite easy; neither easy nor difficult; quite difficult; or, very difficult. The indicator counts those who respond quite or very difficult as a proportion of total responses. The 2025 result showed a decrease in the proportion of Jersey households reporting that they were finding it difficult to cope financially, from 35% in 2024 to 30% in 2025.\n"],
    [44,74,"2024-05-13T00:00:00","This indicator is recognised internationally as a measure of the standard of living. It tracks the amount of money households have to spend or save after financial commitments such as taxes, social security and rates. The median household income is the point at which half of Jersey households have a higher income and half have a lower income (the income of the average household. The data is sourced from Jersey's Household Spending and Income Survey which is run every five years, with the last being completed in 2015. The figures are adjusted through a process called equivalisation, to allow comparisons across different household sizes and make-up (e.g. numbers of children versus adults). They are also adjusted for inflation so comparisons can be made across years (previous values being adjusted to the most recent value)\n\nBetween 2010 and 2015, median weekly household income before housing costs decreased in real terms (i.e. taking into account the effect of inflation) by 7.6% from £736 to £680 a week, but this has now increased to £860 in 2022.\n"],
    [45,93,"2024-05-13T00:00:00","Earning an adequate wage has a big impact on Islanders' ability to afford a good standard of living. If earnings are growing faster than inflation, it shows that people in work are better off. This indicator tracks the change in mean average earnings in Jersey over time. It is presented as an index set at 100 in 1990 so that the change in the real value of earnings can be compared by allowing for inflation. The Covid-19 pandemic has inevitably had a significant impact on the 2020 results. The latest annual increase in average earnings in the private sector was the lowest recorded since private sector earnings were first reported separately in 1995, but this was balanced by an exceptionally low inflation rate in June 2020. This was driven by temporary government relief measures (e.g. withdrawal of parking charges). \nFollowing two years of small real-term decreases (when inflation outpaced average earnings), Jersey's real terms average earnings index increased by 1.9% between June 2019 and June 2020. Over the longer term, average earnings in Jersey have essentially remained flat in real terms since 2001, with gains made up until 2009 being lost in the subsequent decade.\nIn 2024 the change in the value of average earnings allowing for the effect of inflation has increased slightly since the previous year - 114.90.\n\n"],
    [46,23,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","\nHealthy life expectancy (HLE) is an extension of life expectancy, that combines mortality data with general health status data, to produce estimates of the span of life that a person can expect to live in 'very good' or 'good' health. HLE at birth is the number of years a newborn child could expect to live in 'good' or 'very good' health. It is calculated using the previous 3 years' worth of data for each data point.\n\n\nHLE at birth reduced from 68.1 years in 2017 to a low of 62.0 years in 2021 before increasing slightly to 63.5 years 2022.\n\n"],
    [47,24,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","Expected years in poor health at age 65 is a combination of two measures: Life Expectancy at 65 years and Healthy Life Expectancy at 65 years. By subtracting the HLE at 65 years from the LE at 65 years we can estimate the number of years a 65 year old can averagely expect to spend in poor health. Ideally, through good healthcare and public health awareness we would seek to increase the overall Life Expectancy of the population while also increasing the Healthy life Expectancy thus minimising years spent in poor health.\n\nOver the period 2018 to 2021, the Expected years in poor health increased from 7.4 to 9.9 before dropping back to 9.1 in 2022.\n"],
    [48,1,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","Most people use Jersey’s roads every day, as drivers, passengers, cyclists and pedestrians and they should be able to do so safely.  This indicator tracks the number of collisions in which people are either killed or seriously injured (as defined by national police recording rules). This is the most reliable measure because such incidents are the most likely to be reported to the police. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time.\n2021 saw a decrease in the rate of serious road traffic collisions resulting in serious injury per 1,000 population, from 0.50 per 1,000 in 2018 to 0.40. Please note that from 2015 the mid-year population estimates (from the Population & Migration Statistics Report 2011-2021) were used to calculate this measure.\n"],
    [49,1,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","Most people use Jersey’s roads every day, as drivers, passengers, cyclists and pedestrians and they should be able to do so safely.  This indicator tracks the number of collisions in which people are either killed or seriously injured (as defined by national police recording rules). This is the most reliable measure because such incidents are the most likely to be reported to the police. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time.\n2018 saw a slight decrease in the rate of serious road traffic collisions resulting in serious injury per 1,000 population, from 0.57 per 1,000 in 2017 to 0.51 in 2018. This figure was revised from 0.50 to 0.51 in October 2024 due to a revised population estimate.\n"],
    [50,1,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","Most people use Jersey’s roads every day, as drivers, passengers, cyclists and pedestrians and they should be able to do so safely.  This indicator tracks the number of collisions in which people are either killed or seriously injured (as defined by national police recording rules). This is the most reliable measure because such incidents are the most likely to be reported to the police. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time.\n2015 saw an increase in the rate of serious road traffic collisions resulting in serious injury per 1,000 population, from 0.58 per 1,000 in 2012 to 0.68 in 2015. This figure was revised from 0.66 to 0.68 in October 2024 due to revised population estimates.\n"],
    [51,1,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","Most people use Jersey’s roads every day, as drivers, passengers, cyclists and pedestrians and they should be able to do so safely.  This indicator tracks the number of collisions in which people are either killed or seriously injured (as defined by national police recording rules). This is the most reliable measure because such incidents are the most likely to be reported to the police. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n2012 saw an increase in the rate of serious road traffic collisions resulting in serious injury per 1,000 population, from 0.46 per 1,000 in 2009 to 0.58.\n"],
    [52,1,"2009-12-31T00:00:00","\nMost people use Jersey’s roads every day, as drivers, passengers, cyclists and pedestrians and they should be able to do so safely.  This indicator tracks the number of collisions in which people are either killed or seriously injured (as defined by national police recording rules). This is the most reliable measure because such incidents are the most likely to be reported to the police. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time.\n"],
    [53,2,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator combines data from the States of Jersey Fire and Rescue Service on the number of fires in Jersey with demographic data to produce a rate of fires per 1,000 population. It tracks fire safety in Jersey over time while taking into account the effects of a growing population. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n\n2020 saw a decrease in the number of fires per 1,000 population, from 1.70 per 1,000 in 2017 to 1.50.\n\n"],
    [54,2,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator combines data from the States of Jersey Fire and Rescue Service on the number of fires in Jersey with demographic data to produce a rate of fires per 1,000 population. It tracks fire safety in Jersey over time while taking into account the effects of a growing population. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n\n2017 saw a decrease in the number of fires per 1,000 population, from 2.40 per 1,000 in 2014 to 1.70.\n\n"],
    [55,2,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator combines data from the States of Jersey Fire and Rescue Service on the number of fires in Jersey with demographic data to produce a rate of fires per 1,000 population. It tracks fire safety in Jersey over time while taking into account the effects of a growing population. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n\n\n2014 saw  the number of fires per 1,000 population remain static, from 2.30 per 1,000 in 2011 to 2.40\n"],
    [56,2,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator combines data from the States of Jersey Fire and Rescue Service on the number of fires in Jersey with demographic data to produce a rate of fires per 1,000 population. It tracks fire safety in Jersey over time while taking into account the effects of a growing population. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n2011 saw a decrease in the number of fires per 1,000 population, from 3.10 per 1,000 in 2008 to 2.30.\n"],
    [57,2,"2008-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator combines data from the States of Jersey Fire and Rescue Service on the number of fires in Jersey with demographic data to produce a rate of fires per 1,000 population. It tracks fire safety in Jersey over time while taking into account the effects of a growing population.\n\n"],
    [58,3,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","The number of crimes recorded by the police is widely used internationally to provide an overview of community safety over time. This indicator combines the number of crimes recorded by the police with demographic data to take into account changes in population. It should be noted that police recorded crime statistics can be affected by changes in policing activity and recording practice and by the willingness of victims to report. As such, they can only cover crimes that come to the attention of the police. The headline figures also hides variations both within and across crime types. As such, this indicator is a useful supplement to other indicators on community safety and should invite analysis to understand the reasons behind significant variations over time.\n\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. 2014 saw a decrease in the number of crimes recorded by the police, from 40.60, per 1,000 in 2011 to 31.00.\n"],
    [59,3,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","The number of crimes recorded by the police is widely used internationally to provide an overview of community safety over time. This indicator combines the number of crimes recorded by the police with demographic data to take into account changes in population. It should be noted that police recorded crime statistics can be affected by changes in policing activity and recording practice and by the willingness of victims to report. As such, they can only cover crimes that come to the attention of the police. The headline figures also hides variations both within and across crime types. As such, this indicator is a useful supplement to other indicators on community safety and should invite analysis to understand the reasons behind significant variations over time.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. 2011 saw a decrease in the number of crimes recorded by the police, from 52.20, per 1,000 in 2008 to 40.60.\n"],
    [60,3,"2008-12-31T00:00:00","\nThe number of crimes recorded by the police is widely used internationally to provide an overview of community safety over time. This indicator combines the number of crimes recorded by the police with demographic data to take into account changes in population. It should be noted that police recorded crime statistics can be affected by changes in policing activity and recording practice and by the willingness of victims to report. As such, they can only cover crimes that come to the attention of the police. The headline figures also hides variations both within and across crime types. As such, this indicator is a useful supplement to other indicators on community safety and should invite analysis to understand the reasons behind significant variations over time.\n\n"],
    [61,4,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator counts the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance (STIA) benefit claims for full time equivalent (FTE) employees received by the Customer and Local Services department for work-related injuries or ill-health each year. It does not provide a full picture of all work-related accidents and ill-health as not all incidents result in benefit claims, but it offers an independent, reliable insight into key trends in work-related injuries and ill-health. Dividing the total number of claims by FTE employees takes into account the impact of a changing workforce size. The FTE figure is a weighted average for the calendar year produced by Statistics Jersey, which takes into account both full-time and part-time employees.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 full-time equivalent employees. 2021 saw a slight increase in the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance claims, from 24.10, per 1,000 in 2018 to 23.50\n"],
    [62,4,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator counts the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance (STIA) benefit claims for full time equivalent (FTE) employees received by the Customer and Local Services department for work-related injuries or ill-health each year. It does not provide a full picture of all work-related accidents and ill-health as not all incidents result in benefit claims, but it offers an independent, reliable insight into key trends in work-related injuries and ill-health. Dividing the total number of claims by FTE employees takes into account the impact of a changing workforce size. The FTE figure is a weighted average for the calendar year produced by Statistics Jersey, which takes into account both full-time and part-time employees. \nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 full-time equivalent employees. 2018 saw a decrease in the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance claims, from 27.80, per 1,000 in 2015 to 24.10.\n"],
    [63,4,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator counts the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance (STIA) benefit claims for full time equivalent (FTE) employees received by the Customer and Local Services department for work-related injuries or ill-health each year. It does not provide a full picture of all work-related accidents and ill-health as not all incidents result in benefit claims, but it offers an independent, reliable insight into key trends in work-related injuries and ill-health. Dividing the total number of claims by FTE employees takes into account the impact of a changing workforce size. The FTE figure is a weighted average for the calendar year produced by Statistics Jersey, which takes into account both full-time and part-time employees.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 full-time equivalent employees. 2015 saw a decrease in the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance claims, from 34.30, per 1,000 in 2012 to 27.80.\n"],
    [64,4,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator counts the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance (STIA) benefit claims for full time equivalent (FTE) employees received by the Customer and Local Services department for work-related injuries or ill-health each year. It does not provide a full picture of all work-related accidents and ill-health as not all incidents result in benefit claims, but it offers an independent, reliable insight into key trends in work-related injuries and ill-health. Dividing the total number of claims by FTE employees takes into account the impact of a changing workforce size. The FTE figure is a weighted average for the calendar year produced by Statistics Jersey, which takes into account both full-time and part-time employees.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 full-time equivalent employees. 2012 saw a decrease in the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance claims, from 40.30, per 1,000 in 2009 to 34.30.\n"],
    [65,4,"2009-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator counts the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance (STIA) benefit claims for full time equivalent (FTE) employees received by the Customer and Local Services department for work-related injuries or ill-health each year. It does not provide a full picture of all work-related accidents and ill-health as not all incidents result in benefit claims, but it offers an independent, reliable insight into key trends in work-related injuries and ill-health. Dividing the total number of claims by FTE employees takes into account the impact of a changing workforce size. The FTE figure is a weighted average for the calendar year produced by Statistics Jersey, which takes into account both full-time and part-time employees.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 full-time equivalent employees. 2009 saw a decrease in the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance claims, from 44.00, per 1,000 in 2008 to 40.30.\n"],
    [66,4,"2006-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator counts the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance (STIA) benefit claims for full time equivalent (FTE) employees received by the Customer and Local Services department for work-related injuries or ill-health each year. It does not provide a full picture of all work-related accidents and ill-health as not all incidents result in benefit claims, but it offers an independent, reliable insight into key trends in work-related injuries and ill-health. Dividing the total number of claims by FTE employees takes into account the impact of a changing workforce size. The FTE figure is a weighted average for the calendar year produced by Statistics Jersey, which takes into account both full-time and part-time employees."],
    [67,5,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","\nCommunity safety is not just about crime reported to, and recorded by, the police. It is also about whether people feel safe, which is why this indicator focuses on public perceptions of safety. It uses data collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which asks a representative sample of adults about the safety of their neighbourhoods in order to build a picture of community safety across the whole Island. Respondents are asked: 'How safe or unsafe do you consider your neighbourhood to be (within five minutes’ walk of your home)' and can answer: very safe; fairly safe; a bit unsafe; very unsafe; or, don't know. Overall perceptions of safety (very safe and fairly safe) are so high in Jersey that this indicator focuses on the percentage of respondents who say very safe to allow scope for improvement. \n\n\nOverall in 2022, 93% of Islanders said their neighbourhood is very safe or fairly safe with 63% recording a very safe response. The proportion who say very safe has increased from 35% in 2005 to 63% in 2022, including large increases recorded across every parish.\n\n"],
    [68,5,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","\nCommunity safety is not just about crime reported to, and recorded by, the police. It is also about whether people feel safe, which is why this indicator focuses on public perceptions of safety. It uses data collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which asks a representative sample of adults about the safety of their neighbourhoods in order to build a picture of community safety across the whole Island. Respondents are asked: 'How safe or unsafe do you consider your neighbourhood to be (within five minutes’ walk of your home)' and can answer: very safe; fairly safe; a bit unsafe; very unsafe; or, don't know. Overall perceptions of safety (very safe and fairly safe) are so high in Jersey that this indicator focuses on the percentage of respondents who say very safe to allow scope for improvement. \n\n\nThe percentage of islanders who say their neighbourhood is very safe has increased from 59% in 2016 to 60%.  \n\n"],
    [69,5,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","\nCommunity safety is not just about crime reported to, and recorded by, the police. It is also about whether people feel safe, which is why this indicator focuses on public perceptions of safety. It uses data collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which asks a representative sample of adults about the safety of their neighbourhoods in order to build a picture of community safety across the whole Island. Respondents are asked: 'How safe or unsafe do you consider your neighbourhood to be (within five minutes’ walk of your home)' and can answer: very safe; fairly safe; a bit unsafe; very unsafe; or, don't know. Overall perceptions of safety (very safe and fairly safe) are so high in Jersey that this indicator focuses on the percentage of respondents who say very safe to allow scope for improvement. \n\n\nThe percentage of islanders who say their neighbourhood is very safe has increased  from 56% in 2014 to 59%. \n\n"],
    [70,5,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","\nCommunity safety is not just about crime reported to, and recorded by, the police. It is also about whether people feel safe, which is why this indicator focuses on public perceptions of safety. It uses data collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which asks a representative sample of adults about the safety of their neighbourhoods in order to build a picture of community safety across the whole Island. Respondents are asked: 'How safe or unsafe do you consider your neighbourhood to be (within five minutes’ walk of your home)' and can answer: very safe; fairly safe; a bit unsafe; very unsafe; or, don't know. Overall perceptions of safety (very safe and fairly safe) are so high in Jersey that this indicator focuses on the percentage of respondents who say very safe to allow scope for improvement. \n\n\nThe percentage of islanders who say their neighbourhood is very safe has increased from 45% in 2009 to 52%. \n\n"],
    [71,5,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","\nCommunity safety is not just about crime reported to, and recorded by, the police. It is also about whether people feel safe, which is why this indicator focuses on public perceptions of safety. It uses data collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which asks a representative sample of adults about the safety of their neighbourhoods in order to build a picture of community safety across the whole Island. Respondents are asked: 'How safe or unsafe do you consider your neighbourhood to be (within five minutes’ walk of your home)' and can answer: very safe; fairly safe; a bit unsafe; very unsafe; or, don't know. Overall perceptions of safety (very safe and fairly safe) are so high in Jersey that this indicator focuses on the percentage of respondents who say very safe to allow scope for improvement. \n\n\nThe percentage of islanders who say their neighbourhood is very safe has increased  from 52% in 2012 to 56%. \n\n"],
    [72,5,"2009-12-31T00:00:00","\nCommunity safety is not just about crime reported to, and recorded by, the police. It is also about whether people feel safe, which is why this indicator focuses on public perceptions of safety. It uses data collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which asks a representative sample of adults about the safety of their neighbourhoods in order to build a picture of community safety across the whole Island. Respondents are asked: 'How safe or unsafe do you consider your neighbourhood to be (within five minutes’ walk of your home)' and can answer: very safe; fairly safe; a bit unsafe; very unsafe; or, don't know. Overall perceptions of safety (very safe and fairly safe) are so high in Jersey that this indicator focuses on the percentage of respondents who say very safe to allow scope for improvement.\n"],
    [73,6,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","\n\nThis data is collected using the Schools Survey, which is open to all pupils in Years 6, 8, 10 and 12. Respondents are asked if they have been bullied at or near school in the last 12 months. This indicator tracks the proportion of children in Years 6, 8 and 10 who say they have been bullied.\nThe percentage of children in Years 6, 8 and 10 who report having been bullied at or near school in the past 12 months has decreased from 24% in 2019 to 22%.\n"],
    [74,6,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","\n\n\nThis data is collected using the Schools Survey, which is open to all pupils in Years 6, 8, 10 and 12. Respondents are asked if they have been bullied at or near school in the last 12 months. This indicator tracks the proportion of children in Years 6, 8 and 10 who say they have been bullied.\nThe percentage of children in Years 6, 8 and 10 who report having been bullied at or near school in the past 12 months has increased from 24% in 2014 to 27%.\n\n"],
    [75,6,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Schools Survey, which is open to all pupils in Years 6, 8, 10 and 12. Respondents are asked if they have been bullied at or near school in the last 12 months. This indicator tracks the proportion of children in Years 6, 8 and 10 who say they have been bullied.\nThe percentage of children in Years 6, 8 and 10 who report having been bullied at or near school in the past 12 months has increased from 20% in 2010 to 24%.\n"],
    [76,6,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Schools Survey, which is open to all pupils in Years 6, 8, 10 and 12. Respondents are asked if they have been bullied at or near school in the last 12 months. This indicator tracks the proportion of children in Years 6, 8 and 10 who say they have been bullied.\n"],
    [77,11,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","The global public health recommendation is that infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life to achieve optimal growth, development and health, before starting mixed feeding alongside ongoing breastfeeding, where possible. This indicator uses data from the 6 to 8 week development assessment by GPs, to track breastfeeding rates. Across different local authorities in England, breastfeeding rates vary between 21% and 80%. Such variation is not just down to personal choice; it is also about personal and societal circumstances. This indicator helps promote a dialogue about barriers that might prevent mothers in Jersey from breastfeeding and supports the evaluation of different interventions over time.  \nThe percentage of mothers who are breastfeeding (either fully or partially) at 6 - 8 weeks has increased from 60.0% in 2017 to 62.0%.\n"],
    [78,11,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","The global public health recommendation is that infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life to achieve optimal growth, development and health, before starting mixed feeding alongside ongoing breastfeeding, where possible. This indicator uses data from the 6 to 8 week development assessment by GPs, to track breastfeeding rates. Across different local authorities in England, breastfeeding rates vary between 21% and 80%. Such variation is not just down to personal choice; it is also about personal and societal circumstances. This indicator helps promote a dialogue about barriers that might prevent mothers in Jersey from breastfeeding and supports the evaluation of different interventions over time. \nThe percentage of mothers who are breastfeeding (either fully or partially) at 6 - 8 weeks has increased from 54.0% in 2014 to 60.0%.\n"],
    [79,11,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","The global public health recommendation is that infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life to achieve optimal growth, development and health, before starting mixed feeding alongside ongoing breastfeeding, where possible. This indicator uses data from the 6 to 8 week development assessment by GPs, to track breastfeeding rates. Across different local authorities in England, breastfeeding rates vary between 21% and 80%. Such variation is not just down to personal choice; it is also about personal and societal circumstances. This indicator helps promote a dialogue about barriers that might prevent mothers in Jersey from breastfeeding and supports the evaluation of different interventions over time. \nThe percentage of mothers who are breastfeeding (either fully or partially) at 6 - 8 weeks has increased from 51.0% in 2009 to 54.0%.\n"],
    [80,11,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","\n\nThe global public health recommendation is that infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life to achieve optimal growth, development and health, before starting mixed feeding alongside ongoing breastfeeding, where possible. This indicator uses data from the 6 to 8 week development assessment by GPs, to track breastfeeding rates. Across different local authorities in England, breastfeeding rates vary between 21% and 80%. Such variation is not just down to personal choice; it is also about personal and societal circumstances. This indicator helps promote a dialogue about barriers that might prevent mothers in Jersey from breastfeeding and supports the evaluation of different interventions over time.\n"],
    [81,16,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","\n\n\nIn 2019, Skills Jersey was formed by bringing together Trident, Careers Guidance and Skills Coaching teams under one service. Any students identified as not having a destination past October are contacted by a Careers Guidance advisor to identify whether they are in employment, education or training. Support is then offered where applicable. Skills Jersey has also increased the support services delivered in partnership with schools and colleges that are proven to increase positive destinations: Career Guidance; Employer insights and contact; and 121 coaching and mentoring.\nIn 2021 90% of year 11 students in Jersey received 121 careers guidance appointments. In 2016 only 45% of year 11s were able to access this provision. For those needing a longer-term support, the coaching and mentoring provision of Skills Jersey was created with 77% of those accessing this service acquiring a positive destination. Since 2020 Skills Jersey has supported 100% of Jersey's secondary schools and colleges to access direct employer contact or insights on an individual or group basis to help students link the education they are receiving to the world of work.\n\nThe data for this measure was collected using the 2021 and 2011 Censuses and calculating the percentage of 16 to 18 year olds that were not employed, self-employed or in full or part time education. There is currently work going on to improve how this measure is calculated with the aim of providing more timely data than what the 10 yearly Census can provide.\nThe % of those young people identified as NEET has fallen from 10.1% in 2011, to 8.4% in 2021.\n\n\n"],
    [82,16,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","The data for this measure was collected using the 2011 Census and calculating the percentage of 16 to 18 year olds that were not employed, self-employed or in full or part time education. There is currently work going on to improve how this measure is calculated with the aim of providing more timely data than what the 10 yearly Census can provide.\n\n\nThe % of those young people identified as NEET was calculated as 10.1% in 2011.\n"],
    [83,21,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator uses the total amount of pure alcohol sold in Jersey each year to calculate the volume of alcohol consumed per resident aged 15 years or older (accounting for tourists and seasonal workers) for comparison with the United Kingdom and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries. The lower numbers of visitors in 2021, due to COVID-19 pandemic, have had an impact on the below rates.\n\nThe indicator is measured by the average annual consumption of pure alcohol per adult (litres). 2021 saw a slight decrease in annual consumption from 11.80 in 2018 to 11.50.\n"],
    [84,21,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator uses the total amount of pure alcohol sold in Jersey each year to calculate the volume of alcohol consumed per resident aged 15 years or older (accounting for tourists and seasonal workers) for comparison with the United Kingdom and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries.\nThe indicator is measured by the average annual consumption of pure alcohol per adult (litres). 2018 saw a slight increase in annual consumption from 11.50 in 2015 to 11.80.\n"],
    [85,21,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator uses the total amount of pure alcohol sold in Jersey each year to calculate the volume of alcohol consumed per resident aged 15 years or older (accounting for tourists and seasonal workers) for comparison with the United Kingdom and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries.\nThe indicator is measured by the average annual consumption of pure alcohol per adult (litres). 2015 saw a reduction in annual consumption from 12.70 in 2012 to 11.50.\n"],
    [86,21,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator uses the total amount of pure alcohol sold in Jersey each year to calculate the volume of alcohol consumed per resident aged 15 years or older (accounting for tourists and seasonal workers) for comparison with the United Kingdom and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries. \nThe indicator is measured by the average annual consumption of pure alcohol per adult (litres). 2012 saw a reduction in annual consumption from 13.50 in 2009 to 12.70.\n"],
    [87,21,"2009-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator uses the total amount of pure alcohol sold in Jersey each year to calculate the volume of alcohol consumed per resident aged 15 years or older (accounting for tourists and seasonal workers) for comparison with the United Kingdom and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries. \n\nThe indicator is measured by the average annual consumption of pure alcohol per adult (litres). 2009 saw a reduction in annual consumption from 14.50 in 2006 to 13.50.\n"],
    [88,21,"2006-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator uses the total amount of pure alcohol sold in Jersey each year to calculate the volume of alcohol consumed per resident aged 15 years or older (accounting for tourists and seasonal workers) for comparison with the United Kingdom and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries.    \n"],
    [89,22,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how often they smoke cigarettes and are given a range of options from never to daily. This indicator monitors the proportion of adults who currently smoke, either daily or occasionally (not including e-cigarettes).\n\n\nThe percentage of islanders who smoke daily or occasionally has decreased from 15.0% in 2018 to 13.0%.\n"],
    [90,22,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how often they smoke cigarettes and are given a range of options from never to daily. This indicator monitors the proportion of adults who currently smoke, either daily or occasionally (not including e-cigarettes). \nThe percentage of islanders who smoke daily or occasionally has decreased from 18.0% in 2015 to 15.0%.\n"],
    [91,22,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how often they smoke cigarettes and are given a range of options from never to daily. This indicator monitors the proportion of adults who currently smoke, either daily or occasionally (not including e-cigarettes).\nThe percentage of islanders who smoke daily or occasionally has decreased from 22.0% in 2012 to 18.0%.\n"],
    [92,22,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how often they smoke cigarettes and are given a range of options from never to daily. This indicator monitors the proportion of adults who currently smoke, either daily or occasionally (not including e-cigarettes). \nThe percentage of islanders who smoke daily or occasionally has increased from 21.0% in 2008 to 22.0%.\n"],
    [93,22,"2008-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how often they smoke cigarettes and are given a range of options from never to daily. This indicator monitors the proportion of adults who currently smoke, either daily or occasionally (not including e-cigarettes).\nThe percentage of islanders who smoke daily or occasionally has decreased from 25.0% in 2005 to 21.0%.\n"],
    [94,22,"2005-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how often they smoke cigarettes and are given a range of options from never to daily. This indicator monitors the proportion of adults who currently smoke, either daily or occasionally (not including e-cigarettes).\n"],
    [95,25,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scales are used nationally and internationally to measure mental wellbeing at population level and evaluate programmes and policies which aim to improve mental wellbeing. Local data is gathered by regularly using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey to ask a representative sample of adults a standard set of questions from the 'short Warwick-Edinburgh scale'. The responses inform a population-level result on a scale between 7 and 35 with higher scores indicate higher positive mental well-being.\nIn 2022 the average mental well-being score on the short Warwick-Edinburgh scale (7 to 35) remained the same as 2016, at 26.00.\n"],
    [96,25,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scales are used nationally and internationally to measure mental wellbeing at population level and evaluate programmes and policies which aim to improve mental wellbeing. Local data is gathered by regularly using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey to ask a representative sample of adults a standard set of questions from the 'short Warwick-Edinburgh scale'. The responses inform a population-level result on a scale between 7 and 35 with higher scores indicate higher positive mental well-being.\nIn 2016 the average mental well-being score on the short Warwick-Edinburgh scale (7 to 35) remained the same as 2013, at 26.00.\n"],
    [97,25,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scales are used nationally and internationally to measure mental wellbeing at population level and evaluate programmes and policies which aim to improve mental wellbeing. Local data is gathered by regularly using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey to ask a representative sample of adults a standard set of questions from the 'short Warwick-Edinburgh scale'. The responses inform a population-level result on a scale between 7 and 35 with higher scores indicate higher positive mental well-being.\nIn 2013 the average mental well-being score on the short Warwick-Edinburgh scale (7 to 35) remained the same as 2012, at 26.00.\n"],
    [98,25,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","\nThe Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scales are used nationally and internationally to measure mental wellbeing at population level and evaluate programmes and policies which aim to improve mental wellbeing. Local data is gathered by regularly using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey to ask a representative sample of adults a standard set of questions from the 'short Warwick-Edinburgh scale'. The responses inform a population-level result on a scale between 7 and 35 with higher scores indicate higher positive mental well-being.\n"],
    [99,26,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","In many countries, including the UK, Germany, France and the USA, people are recommended to eat five or more portions of fruit and vegetables each day. Data on local consumption is gathered through the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults. Respondents are asked 'how many portions of fruit or vegetables did you eat yesterday'. Responses are categorised into: 0 portions; 1-4 portions; and, 5+ portions (equal to or above the NHS recommended level). \nThe percentage of islanders who eat the recommended level of fruit and vegetables decreased from 35.0% in 2019 to 31.0%.\n"],
    [100,26,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","In many countries, including the UK, Germany, France and the USA, people are recommended to eat five or more portions of fruit and vegetables each day. Data on local consumption is gathered through the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults. Respondents are asked 'how many portions of fruit or vegetables did you eat yesterday'. Responses are categorised into: 0 portions; 1-4 portions; and, 5+ portions (equal to or above the NHS recommended level). \nThe percentage of islanders who eat the recommended level of fruit and vegetables increased from 31.0% in 2017 to 35.0%.\n"],
    [101,26,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","In many countries, including the UK, Germany, France and the USA, people are recommended to eat five or more portions of fruit and vegetables each day. Data on local consumption is gathered through the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults. Respondents are asked 'how many portions of fruit or vegetables did you eat yesterday'. Responses are categorised into: 0 portions; 1-4 portions; and, 5+ portions (equal to or above the NHS recommended level). \nThe percentage of islanders who eat the recommended level of fruit and vegetables decreased from 36.0% in 2013 to 31.0%.\n"],
    [102,26,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","In many countries, including the UK, Germany, France and the USA, people are recommended to eat five or more portions of fruit and vegetables each day. Data on local consumption is gathered through the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults. Respondents are asked 'how many portions of fruit or vegetables did you eat yesterday'. Responses are categorised into: 0 portions; 1-4 portions; and, 5+ portions (equal to or above the NHS recommended level).\nThe percentage of islanders who eat the recommended level of fruit and vegetables increased from 34.0% in 2010 to 36.0%.\n"],
    [103,26,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","In many countries, including the UK, Germany, France and the USA, people are recommended to eat five or more portions of fruit and vegetables each day. Data on local consumption is gathered through the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults. Respondents are asked 'how many portions of fruit or vegetables did you eat yesterday'. Responses are categorised into: 0 portions; 1-4 portions; and, 5+ portions (equal to or above the NHS recommended level).\nThe percentage of islanders who eat the recommended level of fruit and vegetables decreased from 35.0% in 2008 to 34.0%.\n"],
    [104,26,"2008-12-31T00:00:00","\nIn many countries, including the UK, Germany, France and the USA, people are recommended to eat five or more portions of fruit and vegetables each day. Data on local consumption is gathered through the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults. Respondents are asked 'how many portions of fruit or vegetables did you eat yesterday'. Responses are categorised into: 0 portions; 1-4 portions; and, 5+ portions (equal to or above the NHS recommended level).\n"],
    [105,27,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS), which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how many times in a typical week they do at least moderate activity for 30 minutes or longer. The indicator tracks the proportion of adults whose reported levels of physical activity meet national guidelines.\nIn 2021 the percentage of islanders who meet the recommended level of physical activity increased from 51.0% in 2019 to 52.0%.\n"],
    [106,27,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS), which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how many times in a typical week they do at least moderate activity for 30 minutes or longer. The indicator tracks the proportion of adults whose reported levels of physical activity meet national guidelines.\n"],
    [107,28,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","Multi-morbidity is commonly defined as the presence of two or more chronic medical conditions in a patient. These are conditions that currently have no cure, and may be managed with drugs and other treatment. As populations age, the level of multi-morbidity is likely to increase, which will have implications for health and social care provision. GPs record patients with 12 long-term conditions as part of the Jersey Quality Improvement Framework (JQIF). These conditions are a good basis for multi-morbidity analysis and they are agreed amongst clinicians as being important. They are: atrial fibrillation; asthma; coronary heart disease; chronic kidney disease; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; dementia; diabetes; heart failure; hypertension; mental health problems; obesity; stroke and transient ischemic attack. There are now 12 long-term conditions reported (we no longer include Cancer as part of JQIF).\n\nIn 2022 the percentage of population with 2 or more conditions increased from 12.0% in 2021 to 13.0%.\n"],
    [108,28,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","\n\nMulti-morbidity is commonly defined as the presence of two or more chronic medical conditions in a patient. These are conditions that currently have no cure, and may be managed with drugs and other treatment. As populations age, the level of multi-morbidity is likely to increase, which will have implications for health and social care provision. GPs record patients with 12 long-term conditions as part of the Jersey Quality Improvement Framework (JQIF). These conditions are a good basis for multi-morbidity analysis and they are agreed amongst clinicians as being important. They are: atrial fibrillation; asthma; coronary heart disease; chronic kidney disease; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; dementia; diabetes; heart failure; hypertension; mental health problems; obesity; stroke and transient ischemic attack. There are now 12 long-term conditions reported (we no longer include Cancer as part of JQIF). \n\nThere has been no changes in the percentage of population with 2 or more conditions since 2017.\n"],
    [109,29,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","High coverage of immunisations plays a vital role in safeguarding both the wellbeing of individuals and the community at large. By ensuring a broad reach of vaccinations, high coverage effectively restricts the transmission of diseases among those who have not received immunisations, be it due to personal preference or medical circumstances.\nJersey currently offers residents 19 vaccinations: some in childhood; others during their teenage years and some in old age. Each vaccination has a target take up rate. This indicator measures the percentage of the 19 vaccinations to have hit their take-up targets each year.\n\nIn 2022, the percentage take up of vaccinations decreased considerably from 89.0% in 2020 to 47.0%.\n"],
    [110,30,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","Avoidable mortality is an indicator based on the concept that premature deaths from certain conditions should be rare and ideally should not occur in the presence of appropriate public health interventions (preventable deaths) or timely and effective healthcare (treatable deaths). For further information see Jersey Mortality Statistics. The figure presented is the age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR) per 100,000 population which accounts for changes to the age and sex of the population.\n\nThe ASMR rate for Jersey has reduced steadily since 2012 - however due to wide confidence intervals this is not seen as statisically significant (see latest Jersey Mortality Statistics). The latest figure is 168 avoidable deaths per 100,000 population (ASMR).\n"],
    [111,31,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator is used internationally to measure and compare quality of life. The data is gathered from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents score themselves between zero and ten in answer to the question: ‘Overall, how satisfied are you with your life nowadays’, with zero being not at all satisfied and ten being completely satisfied. The indicator counts those who score seven or more as a % of total responses. Before 2017, a different version of the question was used but Jersey's results can now be compared directly with those produced in the UK and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. \n\n\nIn 2022 the percentage of islanders who rate their life satisfaction as 7 or more out of 10 increased from 64.0% in 2020 to 71.0%.\n\n\n"],
    [112,31,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator is used internationally to measure and compare quality of life. The data is gathered from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents score themselves between zero and ten in answer to the question: ‘Overall, how satisfied are you with your life nowadays’, with zero being not at all satisfied and ten being completely satisfied. The indicator counts those who score seven or more as a % of total responses. Before 2017, a different version of the question was used but Jersey's results can now be compared directly with those produced in the UK and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.\n\n\nIn 2020 the percentage of islanders who rate their life satisfaction as 7 or more out of 10 decreased from 66.0% in 2019 to 64.0%.  \n"],
    [113,31,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator is used internationally to measure and compare quality of life. The data is gathered from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents score themselves between zero and ten in answer to the question: ‘Overall, how satisfied are you with your life nowadays’, with zero being not at all satisfied and ten being completely satisfied. The indicator counts those who score seven or more as a % of total responses. Before 2017, a different version of the question was used but Jersey's results can now be compared directly with those produced in the UK and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.\n\n\nIn 2019 the percentage of islanders who rate their life satisfaction as 7 or more out of 10 decreased from 82.0% in 2018 to 66.0%.\n"],
    [114,31,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator is used internationally to measure and compare quality of life. The data is gathered from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents score themselves between zero and ten in answer to the question: ‘Overall, how satisfied are you with your life nowadays’, with zero being not at all satisfied and ten being completely satisfied. The indicator counts those who score seven or more as a % of total responses. Before 2017, a different version of the question was used but Jersey's results can now be compared directly with those produced in the UK and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.\n\n\nIn 2018 the percentage of islanders who rate their life satisfaction as 7 or more out of 10 increased from 75.0% in 2017 to 82.0%.\n"],
    [115,31,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","\n\n\n\nThis indicator is used internationally to measure and compare quality of life. The data is gathered from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents score themselves between zero and ten in answer to the question: ‘Overall, how satisfied are you with your life nowadays’, with zero being not at all satisfied and ten being completely satisfied. The indicator counts those who score seven or more as a % of total responses. Before 2017, a different version of the question was used but Jersey's results can now be compared directly with those produced in the UK and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.\n"],
    [116,32,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","The life experience of people with a disability can be very different from those without a disability. They can face barriers in accessing services that many take for granted, including health, education, employment, and transport. The research for the 2017 Disability Strategy highlighted how such challenges contribute to significant differences in life satisfaction between disabled Islanders and the rest of the population. This indicator uses data from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey, to track how this gap in life satisfaction changes over time. The survey asks respondents to score themselves between 0 to 10 in answer to the question: ‘Overall, how satisfied are you with your life nowadays’, with zero being not at all satisfied and ten being completely satisfied. This indicator focuses on the difference in the percentage of the population with a high life satisfaction (7 to 10) between (a) Islanders with a long-term condition that affects their daily lives and (b) the rest of the population.\n\nIn 2022 the gap in percentage of disabled islanders reporting high life satisfaction compared to the rest of the population decreased from 28.0% in 2020 to 22.0%.\n"],
    [117,32,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","The life experience of people with a disability can be very different from those without a disability. They can face barriers in accessing services that many take for granted, including health, education, employment, and transport. The research for the 2017 Disability Strategy highlighted how such challenges contribute to significant differences in life satisfaction between disabled Islanders and the rest of the population. This indicator uses data from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey, to track how this gap in life satisfaction changes over time. The survey asks respondents to score themselves between 0 to 10 in answer to the question: ‘Overall, how satisfied are you with your life nowadays’, with zero being not at all satisfied and ten being completely satisfied. This indicator focuses on the difference in the percentage of the population with a high life satisfaction (7 to 10) between (a) Islanders with a long-term condition that affects their daily lives and (b) the rest of the population.\n\nIn 2020 the gap in percentage of disabled islanders reporting high life satisfaction compared to the rest of the population remined the same at 28.0%.\n"],
    [118,32,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","The life experience of people with a disability can be very different from those without a disability. They can face barriers in accessing services that many take for granted, including health, education, employment, and transport. The research for the 2017 Disability Strategy highlighted how such challenges contribute to significant differences in life satisfaction between disabled Islanders and the rest of the population. This indicator uses data from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey, to track how this gap in life satisfaction changes over time. The survey asks respondents to score themselves between 0 to 10 in answer to the question: ‘Overall, how satisfied are you with your life nowadays’, with zero being not at all satisfied and ten being completely satisfied. This indicator focuses on the difference in the percentage of the population with a high life satisfaction (7 to 10) between (a) Islanders with a long-term condition that affects their daily lives and (b) the rest of the population.\nIn 2019 the gap in percentage of disabled islanders reporting high life satisfaction compared to the rest of the population increased from 27.0% in 2018 to 28.0%."],
    [119,32,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","The life experience of people with a disability can be very different from those without a disability. They can face barriers in accessing services that many take for granted, including health, education, employment, and transport. The research for the 2017 Disability Strategy highlighted how such challenges contribute to significant differences in life satisfaction between disabled Islanders and the rest of the population. This indicator uses data from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey, to track how this gap in life satisfaction changes over time. The survey asks respondents to score themselves between 0 to 10 in answer to the question: ‘Overall, how satisfied are you with your life nowadays’, with zero being not at all satisfied and ten being completely satisfied. This indicator focuses on the difference in the percentage of the population with a high life satisfaction (7 to 10) between (a) Islanders with a long-term condition that affects their daily lives and (b) the rest of the population.\n\nIn 2018 the gap in percentage of disabled islanders reporting high life satisfaction compared to the rest of the population decreased from 28% in 2017 to 27%.\n"],
    [120,32,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","\nThe life experience of people with a disability can be very different from those without a disability. They can face barriers in accessing services that many take for granted, including health, education, employment, and transport. The research for the 2017 Disability Strategy highlighted how such challenges contribute to significant differences in life satisfaction between disabled Islanders and the rest of the population. This indicator uses data from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey, to track how this gap in life satisfaction changes over time. The survey asks respondents to score themselves between 0 to 10 in answer to the question: ‘Overall, how satisfied are you with your life nowadays’, with zero being not at all satisfied and ten being completely satisfied. This indicator focuses on the difference in the percentage of the population with a high life satisfaction (7 to 10) between (a) Islanders with a long-term condition that affects their daily lives and (b) the rest of the population.\n"],
    [121,33,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked ‘How do you rate the range of cultural events, attractions and activities available in Jersey', and can answer: very good; good; poor; or, very poor. The indicator is calculated by adding the number of very good and good responses, and dividing by the total responses.\nIn 2022 the percentage of islanders who rate Jersey’s range of cultural events, attractions and activities as good or very good  decreased from 73.0% in 2019 to 60.0%.\n"],
    [122,33,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked ‘How do you rate the range of cultural events, attractions and activities available in Jersey', and can answer: very good; good; poor; or, very poor. The indicator is calculated by adding the number of very good and good responses, and dividing by the total responses.\nIn 2019 the percentage of islanders who rate Jersey’s range of cultural events, attractions and activities as good or very good slightly decreased from 74.0% in 2017 to 73.0%.\n"],
    [123,33,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked ‘How do you rate the range of cultural events, attractions and activities available in Jersey', and can answer: very good; good; poor; or, very poor. The indicator is calculated by adding the number of very good and good responses, and dividing by the total responses.\nIn 2017 75.0 % of islanders rated Jersey’s range of cultural events, attractions and activities as good or very good. This was the same percentage in 2013.\n"],
    [124,33,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked ‘How do you rate the range of cultural events, attractions and activities available in Jersey', and can answer: very good; good; poor; or, very poor. The indicator is calculated by adding the number of very good and good responses, and dividing by the total responses.\n"],
    [125,34,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked ‘How do you rate the range of sporting activities and events available in Jersey', and can answer: very good; good; poor; or, very poor. The indicator is calculated by adding the number of very good and good responses, and dividing by the total responses.\nIn 2023, 70% of adults rated Jersey's sporting activies and events as good (54%) or very good (16%). This has reduced considerably over the last 10 years from a high of 90% in 2013.\n"],
    [126,35,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","Volunteering is widely used as a measure of community engagement and social connections because of its importance in increasing social cohesion and improving quality of life. Volunteers create, support and sustain organisations that provide vital services in areas, such as social and health care, help community sport, recreation, arts and culture thrive, and play an integral part in protecting and enhancing Jersey's natural environment.  This indicator uses data from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey.\n\nIn 2019 the percentage of islanders who have volunteered in the previous 12 months slightly decreased from 45.0% in 2017 to 43.0%.\n"],
    [127,35,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","\nVolunteering is widely used as a measure of community engagement and social connections because of its importance in increasing social cohesion and improving quality of life. Volunteers create, support and sustain organisations that provide vital services in areas, such as social and health care, help community sport, recreation, arts and culture thrive, and play an integral part in protecting and enhancing Jersey's natural environment.   This indicator uses data from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey.\n\n\nIn 2017 the percentage of islanders who have volunteered in the previous 12 months increased from 39.0% in 2013 to 45.0%.\n"],
    [128,35,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","\n\nVolunteering is widely used as a measure of community engagement and social connections because of its importance in increasing social cohesion and improving quality of life. Volunteers create, support and sustain organisations that provide vital services in areas, such as social and health care, help community sport, recreation, arts and culture thrive, and play an integral part in protecting and enhancing Jersey's natural environment.  This indicator uses data from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. \n"],
    [129,36,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data was collected via the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey, respondents are asked whether they consider that they have been discriminated against on a variety of grounds including age, race and gender in the previous 12 months. In jurisdictions worldwide, it is taken for granted that people should be protected against discrimination. The data provided by this indicator supported the roll-out of new legal protections against discrimination in Jersey from 2014. It is not realistic to expect all discrimination to be formally reported, so this indicator complements official case records to help understand the scale of the problem and the impact of efforts to address the issue over time. \n\n\nIn 2019 the percentage of islanders who report having been discriminated against in the previous 12 months has increased from 23.0% in 2017 to 31.0%.\n"],
    [130,36,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","This data was collected via the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey, respondents are asked whether they consider that they have been discriminated against on a variety of grounds including age, race and gender in the previous 12 months. In jurisdictions worldwide, it is taken for granted that people should be protected against discrimination. The data provided by this indicator supported the roll-out of new legal protections against discrimination in Jersey from 2014. It is not realistic to expect all discrimination to be formally reported, so this indicator complements official case records to help understand the scale of the problem and the impact of efforts to address the issue over time.\n\nIn 2017 the percentage of islanders who report having been discriminated against in the previous 12 months has steadily decreased from 25.0% in 2012 to 23.0%.\n"],
    [131,36,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data was collected via the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey, respondents are asked whether they consider that they have been discriminated against on a variety of grounds including age, race and gender in the previous 12 months. In jurisdictions worldwide, it is taken for granted that people should be protected against discrimination. It is not realistic to expect all discrimination to be formally reported, so this indicator complements official case records to help understand the scale of the problem and the impact of efforts to address the issue over time. \n"],
    [132,37,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator uses the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey, to monitor social isolation. Respondents are asked: 'How often do you socialise (face-to-face) with people outside of your household', and can answer: daily; weekly; monthly; rarely; or, never. This indicator measures the proportion of people who say rarely or never. In 2022, 9% of adults in Jersey rarely or never socialised face-to-face with people outside their own household. By comparison, more than eight out of ten adults reported socialising face to face with people outside their own household at least weekly. \n"],
    [133,37,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator uses the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey, to monitor social isolation. Respondents are asked: 'How often do you socialise (face-to-face) with people outside of your household', and can answer: daily; weekly; monthly; rarely; or, never. This indicator measures the proportion of people who say rarely or never. \nIn 2018 the percentage of islanders who rarely or never socialise with people outside their household decreased from 10.0% in 2016 to 6.0%.\n"],
    [134,37,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator uses the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey, to monitor social isolation. Respondents are asked: 'How often do you socialise (face-to-face) with people outside of your household', and can answer: daily; weekly; monthly; rarely; or, never. This indicator measures the proportion of people who say rarely or never.\nIn 2016 the percentage of islanders who rarely or never socialise with people outside their household increased from 9.0% in 2012 to 10.0%.\n"],
    [135,37,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator uses the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey, to monitor social isolation. Respondents are asked: 'How often do you socialise (face-to-face) with people outside of your household', and can answer: daily; weekly; monthly; rarely; or, never. This indicator measures the proportion of people who say rarely or never. \n"],
    [136,39,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Participants are asked 'How do you rate the range of the following leisure activities available in Jersey' and can rate social and recreational activities (bars, restaurants, social clubs, etc) as very good, good, poor or very poor. In 2023, 74% of respondents rated Jersey's range of social and recreational activities as good (55%) or very good (19%). Given the high overall rating, the real opportunity for improvement lies in shifting the proportion of people who rate the social and recreational activities in Jersey as very good from its current level of 19%. In general, a smaller percentage of 16 to 34 year olds rated the leisure activities offered in Jersey as good or very good compared to older age groups.\n"],
    [137,100000,"2000-01-01T00:00:00","the quality of people’s lives\n"],
    [138,200000,"2000-01-01T00:00:00","the quality of the natural world around us\n"],
    [139,300000,"2000-01-01T00:00:00","how well the economy is performing\n"],
    [140,1000,"2000-01-01T00:00:00","\nThis outcome is about being and feeling safe, both of which are fundamental to our quality of life. Ensuring Islanders feel protected impacts on our overall wellbeing as a community, as well as affecting other areas, such as health care resources and economic productivity.\n"],
    [141,2000,"2000-01-01T00:00:00","\nThis outcome is about ensuring that Jersey is a place where all Islanders can continue to develop to meet their full potential. While it is particularly important for children and young people to be ready for, and to succeed in, school; learning and growing shouldn't stop there but be encouraged for all ages.\n"],
    [142,3000,"2000-01-01T00:00:00","\nThis outcome is about Islanders being healthy and, as a result, having the opportunity to live longer and active lives. This helps prevent the need for health interventions and ensures that healthcare and support can be targeted to those who need it most. It is also about ensuring that people can access the right treatment when they need it.\n"],
    [143,4000,"2000-01-01T00:00:00","\nOur future relies on people wanting to live in, or return to, Jersey. An important factor influencing that choice is Jersey’s attraction as an Island where people and community matter – a great place to live, socialise, grow up and belong. Being a small Island means we have the opportunity to remain a place where community really means something.\n"],
    [144,5000,"2000-01-01T00:00:00","\nThere is a close relationship between our built environment and our health and social wellbeing. The way we develop St Helier and the rest of our parishes not only affects the character of our \nIsland but how we interact with each other. It has important implications for transport, crime and recreation and will help address future climate change, energy and water use challenges. \n"],
    [145,6000,"2000-01-01T00:00:00","\nGood stewardship means taking action to ensure that the natural environment so treasured by Islanders is available for future generations to enjoy. Despite the Island’s small size, it contains \nan incredibly diverse range of natural habitats alongside our more built-up areas and many would argue that Jersey’s countryside and coast contribute significantly to our quality of life.\n"],
    [146,7000,"2000-01-01T00:00:00","\nOur environment underpins every aspect of our lives – clean air, fresh water, protecting our resources and managing our waste are all vital to our health, wellbeing and quality of life.\n"],
    [147,8000,"2000-01-01T00:00:00","\nA decent income is crucial for our quality of life because most basic needs – food, water, shelter, health care and many forms of recreation – have to be bought; affordable living is about being able to afford what you need to lead a healthy, happy and productive life.\n"],
    [148,9000,"2000-01-01T00:00:00","\nJersey must compete against many places to attract and retain companies and skilled workers. Maintaining an attractive and competitive business environment is essential if our economy is to continue to provide employment and funds for our infrastructure and services.\n"],
    [149,10000,"2000-01-01T00:00:00","\nAn economy is successful if it can provide high income jobs and keep people in work. Increasing the proportion of higher value jobs in our economy entails encouraging our talented people to \nremain here for employment and to progress up the skills ladder, and attracting others to Jersey who can help businesses grow, become more productive and help create better employment \nopportunities for Islanders.\n"],
    [150,29,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","\nHigh coverage of immunisations plays a vital role in safeguarding both the wellbeing of individuals and the community at large. By ensuring a broad reach of vaccinations, high coverage effectively restricts the transmission of diseases among those who have not received immunisations, be it due to personal preference or medical circumstances. \n\n\nJersey currently offers residents 19 vaccinations: some in childhood; others during their teenage years and some in old age. Each vaccination has a target take up rate. This indicator measures the percentage of the 19 vaccinations to have hit their take-up targets each year.\n\n\nIn 2020, the percentage take up of vaccinations increased from 74.0% in 2018 to 89.0%.\n"],
    [151,29,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","\nHigh coverage of immunisations plays a vital role in safeguarding both the wellbeing of individuals and the community at large. By ensuring a broad reach of vaccinations, high coverage effectively restricts the transmission of diseases among those who have not received immunisations, be it due to personal preference or medical circumstances.\n\n\nJersey currently offers residents 19 vaccinations: some in childhood; others during their teenage years and some in old age. Each vaccination has a target take up rate. This indicator measures the percentage of the 19 vaccinations to have hit their take-up targets each year. \n\n\nIn 2018, the percentage take up of vaccinations increased from 53.0% in 2016 to 74.0%.\n"],
    [152,29,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","\nHigh coverage of immunisations plays a vital role in safeguarding both the wellbeing of individuals and the community at large. By ensuring a broad reach of vaccinations, high coverage effectively restricts the transmission of diseases among those who have not received immunisations, be it due to personal preference or medical circumstances.   \n\n\nJersey currently offers residents 19 vaccinations: some in childhood; others during their teenage years and some in old age. Each vaccination has a target take up rate. This indicator measures the percentage of the 19 vaccinations to have hit their take-up targets each year.\n\n\nIn 2016, the percentage take up of vaccinations decreased from 73.0% in 2014 to 53.0%.\n"],
    [153,29,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","\nHigh coverage of immunisations plays a vital role in safeguarding both the wellbeing of individuals and the community at large. By ensuring a broad reach of vaccinations, high coverage effectively restricts the transmission of diseases among those who have not received immunisations, be it due to personal preference or medical circumstances.\nJersey currently offers residents 19 vaccinations: some in childhood; others during their teenage years and some in old age. Each vaccination has a target take up rate. This indicator measures the percentage of the 19 vaccinations to have hit their take-up targets each year. \n"],
    [154,34,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked ‘How do you rate the range of sporting activities and events available in Jersey', and can answer: very good; good; poor; or, very poor. The indicator is calculated by adding the number of very good and good responses, and dividing by the total responses.\nIn 2019, the percentage of adults who rated Jersey's sporting activities and events as good or very good decreased from 90.0% in 2017, to 84.0%.\n"],
    [155,34,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked ‘How do you rate the range of sporting activities and events available in Jersey', and can answer: very good; good; poor; or, very poor. The indicator is calculated by adding the number of very good and good responses, and dividing by the total responses. \nIn 2017, the percentage of adults who rated Jersey's sporting activities and events as good or very good remained the same as 2013, at 90.0%.\n"],
    [156,34,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked ‘How do you rate the range of sporting activities and events available in Jersey', and can answer: very good; good; poor; or, very poor. The indicator is calculated by adding the number of very good and good responses, and dividing by the total responses.\n"],
    [157,38,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","\nThe Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS) asks a representative sample of Jersey adults to rate their 'trust' in the Government on a scale of 1-10, where 1 is don't trust at all, and 10 is trust completely. This score is a combination of the average JOLS scores for trust in (i) Government Departments and (ii) The States Assembly. \nThe average score of 5.0 in 2020 was an increase from 4.6 in 2019.\n"],
    [158,38,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","\nThe Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS) asks a representative sample of Jersey adults to rate their 'trust' in the Government on a scale of 1-10, where 1 is don't trust at all, and 10 is trust completely. This score is a combination of the average JOLS scores for trust in (i) Government Departments and (ii) The States Assembly.\n"],
    [159,39,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Participants are asked 'How do you rate the range of the following leisure activities available in Jersey' and can rate social and recreational activities (bars, restaurants, social clubs, etc) as very good, good, poor or very poor.  \nIn 2017, the percentage of islanders who rate the range of social and recreational activities in Jersey as good or very good increased from 88.0% in 2013 to 91.0%.\n"],
    [160,39,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Participants are asked 'How do you rate the range of the following leisure activities available in Jersey' and can rate social and recreational activities (bars, restaurants, social clubs, etc) as very good, good, poor or very poor. \n"],
    [161,41,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data was collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents were asked: 'Overall, how satisfied are you with your current housing' and can answer very satisfied; fairly satisfied; not very satisfied; or, not at all satisfied.\nIn 2018, the percentage of islanders who are very satisfied with their housing increased from 56.0% in 2015 to 64.0%.\n"],
    [162,41,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data was collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents were asked: 'Overall, how satisfied are you with your current housing' and can answer very satisfied; fairly satisfied; not very satisfied; or, not at all satisfied.\nIn 2015, the percentage of islanders who are very satisfied with their housing decreased from 58.0% in 2012 to 56.0%.\n"],
    [163,41,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data was collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents were asked: 'Overall, how satisfied are you with your current housing' and can answer very satisfied; fairly satisfied; not very satisfied; or, not at all satisfied. \n"],
    [164,43,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator tracks traffic flow on the nine main routes into St Helier during the morning peak period for a typical winter morning, as recorded by automatic traffic counters. Since 2016 new monitoring equipment as been used in order to record the traffic flow more reliably.\n\n\nIn 2022, morning peak traffic on nine main routes into St Helier decreased from 10,505 vehicles in 2020 to 9,990.\n"],
    [165,43,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator tracks traffic flow on the nine main routes into St Helier during the morning peak period for a typical winter morning, as recorded by automatic traffic counters. Since 2016 new monitoring equipment as been used in order to record the traffic flow more reliably.\n\n\n\nIn 2020, morning peak traffic on nine main routes into St Helier slightly decreased from 10,679 vehicles in 2018 to 10,505.\n"],
    [166,43,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator tracks traffic flow on the nine main routes into St Helier during the morning peak period for a typical winter morning, as recorded by automatic traffic counters. Since 2016 new monitoring equipment as been used in order to record the traffic flow more reliably.\n\n\nIn 2018, morning peak traffic on nine main routes into St Helier slightly decreased from 10,978 vehicles in 2016 to 10,679.\n"],
    [167,43,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator tracks traffic flow on the nine main routes into St Helier during the morning peak period for a typical winter morning, as recorded by automatic traffic counters. Since 2016 new monitoring equipment as been used in order to record the traffic flow more reliably."],
    [168,44,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which is sent to a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked about their usual mode of transport to work.  Walking, cycling and bus travel are all included as active modes of travel; the latter because research has shown that taking the bus involves more walking that taking the car.  Increasing the proportion of islanders who actively travel to work would help to ease per hour traffic congestion, and have a positive impact on air quality, energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Active travel has also been shown to benefit people’s physical and mental health, and would contribute towards improving St Helier as a place to live.  It also supports affordable living by enabling households to make significant savings on transport costs.\n\n\nThe overall proportion of  islanders using active form of travel as their usual mode of transport to work increased from 29% in 2006 and 36% in 2011. Since 2011 the value remained at around 40% until dipping to 34% in 2023.\n"],
    [169,44,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which is sent to a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked about their usual mode of transport to work.  Walking, cycling and bus travel are all included as active modes of travel; the latter because research has shown that taking the bus involves more walking that taking the car.  Increasing the proportion of islanders who actively travel to work would help to ease per hour traffic congestion, and have a positive impact on air quality, energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Active travel has also been shown to benefit people’s physical and mental health, and would contribute towards improving St Helier as a place to live.  It also supports affordable living by enabling households to make significant savings on transport costs.   \n\n\nIn 2019, the percentage of journeys to work usually made by walking, cycling or public transport increased from 40.0% in 2016 to 41.0%.\n\n"],
    [170,44,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which is sent to a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked about their usual mode of transport to work.  Walking, cycling and bus travel are all included as active modes of travel; the latter because research has shown that taking the bus involves more walking that taking the car.  Increasing the proportion of islanders who actively travel to work would help to ease per hour traffic congestion, and have a positive impact on air quality, energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Active travel has also been shown to benefit people’s physical and mental health, and would contribute towards improving St Helier as a place to live.  It also supports affordable living by enabling households to make significant savings on transport costs.   \n\n\nIn 2016, the percentage of journeys to work usually made by walking, cycling or public transport increased from 38.0% in 2013 to 40.0%."],
    [171,44,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which is sent to a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked about their usual mode of transport to work.  Walking, cycling and bus travel are all included as active modes of travel; the latter because research has shown that taking the bus involves more walking that taking the car.  Increasing the proportion of islanders who actively travel to work would help to ease per hour traffic congestion, and have a positive impact on air quality, energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Active travel has also been shown to benefit people’s physical and mental health, and would contribute towards improving St Helier as a place to live.  It also supports affordable living by enabling households to make significant savings on transport costs.  \n\n\nIn 2013, the percentage of journeys to work usually made by walking, cycling or public transport was 38.0%, the same as it was 2009.\n\n"],
    [172,44,"2009-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which is sent to a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked about their usual mode of transport to work.  Walking, cycling and bus travel are all included as active modes of travel; the latter because research has shown that taking the bus involves more walking that taking the car.  Increasing the proportion of islanders who actively travel to work would help to ease per hour traffic congestion, and have a positive impact on air quality, energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Active travel has also been shown to benefit people’s physical and mental health, and would contribute towards improving St Helier as a place to live.  It also supports affordable living by enabling households to make significant savings on transport costs.  \n\n\nIn 2009, the percentage of journeys to work usually made by walking, cycling or public transport increased from 29.0% in 2006 to 38.0%.\n\n"],
    [173,44,"2006-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which is sent to a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked about their usual mode of transport to work.  Walking, cycling and bus travel are all included as active modes of travel; the latter because research has shown that taking the bus involves more walking that taking the car.  Increasing the proportion of islanders who actively travel to work would help to ease per hour traffic congestion, and have a positive impact on air quality, energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Active travel has also been shown to benefit people’s physical and mental health, and would contribute towards improving St Helier as a place to live.  It also supports affordable living by enabling households to make significant savings on transport costs.\n"],
    [174,51,"2004-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly. \n\n\nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall.\n"],
    [175,51,"2007-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly. \n\n\nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall.\n\n\nIn 2007, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 16 species of butterfly) decreased from 100.00 in 2004 to 98.74.\n\n\n"],
    [176,51,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly.\n\n\nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall. \n\n\nIn 2010, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 16 species of butterfly) increased from 98.74 in 2007 to 120.83.\n\n\n"],
    [177,51,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly.\n\n\nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall.  \n\n\nIn 2013, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 16 species of butterfly) increased from 120.83 in 2010 to 147.56.\n\n\n"],
    [178,51,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly.\n\n\nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall. \n\n\nIn 2016, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 24 species of butterfly) increased from 147.56 in 2013 to 152.15.\n\n"],
    [179,51,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly. \n\n\nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall.\n\n\nIn 2019, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 16 species of butterfly) decreased from 152.15 in 2016 to 145.79.\n\n\n"],
    [180,51,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly. \n\n\nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall. \n\n\nIn 2022, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 16 species of butterfly) decreased from 145.79 in 2019 to 116.54.\n\n\n"],
    [181,52,"1999-12-31T00:00:00","\nBird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself. \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\n"],
    [182,52,"2002-12-31T00:00:00","\nBird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself. \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\n\n\nIn 2002, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) decreased by 32.50 in 1999 to 29.70.\n"],
    [183,52,"2005-12-31T00:00:00","\nBird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself.\nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\nIn 2005, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) decreased by 29.70 in 2002 to 26.10.\n"],
    [184,52,"2008-12-31T00:00:00","\nBird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself.\nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\n\n\nIn 2008, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) decreased by 26.10 in 2005 to 19.90.\n\n"],
    [185,52,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","\nBird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself.                                                   \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\nIn 2011, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) increased by 19.80 in 2008 to 23.60.\n"],
    [186,52,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","\nBird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself. \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\nIn 2014, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) decreased by 23.60 in 2011 to 19.70.\n"],
    [187,52,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","\nBird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself. \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\nIn 2017, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types remained similar at 19.40, compared to 19.70 in 2014\n"],
    [188,52,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","\nBird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself.\nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\nIn 2020, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) increased by 19.40 in 2017 to 21.00.\n"],
    [189,52,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","\nBird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself.\nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\n"],
    [190,53,"2009-12-31T00:00:00","\n\nDespite its small size, Jersey contains an incredibly diverse range of natural habitats. The Island's geographical position, and favourable climate, has resulted in a mixture of British and European animals and plants, some of which can only be found in the Channel Islands. Jersey has made international commitments to conserve its species, habitats and ecosystems, for which the designation of Sites of Special Interest (SSI) is a vital component. Protecting the Island's natural environment also contributes significantly to Islanders' overall quality of life. Engaging with nature, for example, can benefit mental and physical wellbeing.\nThis indicator covers the extent in hectares of protected areas above the mean high water level (where geological and ecological sites coincide, the land area is only counted once). The first ecological SSIs were designated in 1996 to satisfy the requirements of international conventions. To-date, 28 Sites of Special Ecological Interest and 22 Sites of Special Geological Interest have been designated. The total area covered, 548 hectares, equates to about 5% of Jersey's land area, and includes key habitats such as wetlands, woodland, hedgerows, maritime heath, coastal sand dunes and grassland. Only about 20% of Jersey’s key semi-natural habitats are protected by SSI designation, so a large area of critical natural habitat remains unprotected.\n\n\n\n"],
    [191,53,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","\nDespite its small size, Jersey contains an incredibly diverse range of natural habitats. The Island's geographical position, and favourable climate, has resulted in a mixture of British and European animals and plants, some of which can only be found in the Channel Islands. Jersey has made international commitments to conserve its species, habitats and ecosystems, for which the designation of Sites of Special Interest (SSI) is a vital component. Protecting the Island's natural environment also contributes significantly to Islanders' overall quality of life. Engaging with nature, for example, can benefit mental and physical wellbeing.\nThis indicator covers the extent in hectares of protected areas above the mean high water level (where geological and ecological sites coincide, the land area is only counted once). The first ecological SSIs were designated in 1996 to satisfy the requirements of international conventions. To-date, 28 Sites of Special Ecological Interest and 22 Sites of Special Geological Interest have been designated. The total area covered, 548 hectares, equates to about 5% of Jersey's land area, and includes key habitats such as wetlands, woodland, hedgerows, maritime heath, coastal sand dunes and grassland. Only about 20% of Jersey’s key semi-natural habitats are protected by SSI designation, so a large area of critical natural habitat remains unprotected.\nIn 2012, the area of Jersey’s land which is designated as SSI increased from 515.31 in 2009 to 518.32.\n"],
    [192,53,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","\nDespite its small size, Jersey contains an incredibly diverse range of natural habitats. The Island's geographical position, and favourable climate, has resulted in a mixture of British and European animals and plants, some of which can only be found in the Channel Islands. Jersey has made international commitments to conserve its species, habitats and ecosystems, for which the designation of Sites of Special Interest (SSI) is a vital component. Protecting the Island's natural environment also contributes significantly to Islanders' overall quality of life. Engaging with nature, for example, can benefit mental and physical wellbeing.\nThis indicator covers the extent in hectares of protected areas above the mean high water level (where geological and ecological sites coincide, the land area is only counted once). The first ecological SSIs were designated in 1996 to satisfy the requirements of international conventions. To-date, 28 Sites of Special Ecological Interest and 22 Sites of Special Geological Interest have been designated. The total area covered, 548 hectares, equates to about 5% of Jersey's land area, and includes key habitats such as wetlands, woodland, hedgerows, maritime heath, coastal sand dunes and grassland. Only about 20% of Jersey’s key semi-natural habitats are protected by SSI designation, so a large area of critical natural habitat remains unprotected. \nIn 2015, the area of Jersey’s land which is designated as SSI increased from 518.32 in 2012 to 523.83.\n"],
    [193,53,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","\nDespite its small size, Jersey contains an incredibly diverse range of natural habitats. The Island's geographical position, and favourable climate, has resulted in a mixture of British and European animals and plants, some of which can only be found in the Channel Islands. Jersey has made international commitments to conserve its species, habitats and ecosystems, for which the designation of Sites of Special Interest (SSI) is a vital component. Protecting the Island's natural environment also contributes significantly to Islanders' overall quality of life. Engaging with nature, for example, can benefit mental and physical wellbeing. \nThis indicator covers the extent in hectares of protected areas above the mean high water level (where geological and ecological sites coincide, the land area is only counted once). The first ecological SSIs were designated in 1996 to satisfy the requirements of international conventions. To-date, 28 Sites of Special Ecological Interest and 22 Sites of Special Geological Interest have been designated. The total area covered, 548 hectares, equates to about 5% of Jersey's land area, and includes key habitats such as wetlands, woodland, hedgerows, maritime heath, coastal sand dunes and grassland. Only about 20% of Jersey’s key semi-natural habitats are protected by SSI designation, so a large area of critical natural habitat remains unprotected. \nIn 2018, the area of Jersey’s land which is designated as SSI increased from 523.83 in 2015 to 531.24.\n"],
    [194,53,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","\nDespite its small size, Jersey contains an incredibly diverse range of natural habitats. The Island's geographical position, and favourable climate, has resulted in a mixture of British and European animals and plants, some of which can only be found in the Channel Islands. Jersey has made international commitments to conserve its species, habitats and ecosystems, for which the designation of Sites of Special Interest (SSI) is a vital component. Protecting the Island's natural environment also contributes significantly to Islanders' overall quality of life. Engaging with nature, for example, can benefit mental and physical wellbeing.\nThis indicator covers the extent in hectares of protected areas above the mean high water level (where geological and ecological sites coincide, the land area is only counted once). The first ecological SSIs were designated in 1996 to satisfy the requirements of international conventions. To-date, 28 Sites of Special Ecological Interest and 22 Sites of Special Geological Interest have been designated. The total area covered, 548 hectares, equates to about 5% of Jersey's land area, and includes key habitats such as wetlands, woodland, hedgerows, maritime heath, coastal sand dunes and grassland. Only about 20% of Jersey’s key semi-natural habitats are protected by SSI designation, so a large area of critical natural habitat remains unprotected.\nThree new ecological SSIs, covering 17 hectares, were added along the coast of St Ouen's Bay at the beginning of 2020.\nIn 2021, the area of Jersey’s land which is designated as SSI increased from 531.24 in 2018 to 548.44.\n"],
    [195,54,"2008-12-31T00:00:00","\nMany seas, oceans and coastal regions suffer from the adverse effect of human activity and in response some governments have established Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to help restore and conserve fragile ecosystems. Jersey’s coastal waters are home to several internationally important habitats, the most notable of which are seagrass meadows, kelp forests and maerl, all of which play a role in local biodiversity and maintaining the health of our marine environment. \nThe protection of these habitats from potential threats has led to the establishment of a network of MPAs around Jersey and on the offshore reefs at Les Écréhous and Les Minquiers. These MPAs prohibit activities that most threaten the marine species and habitats, including the use of mobile fishing gear such as dredges and trawls. Creating and registering an MPA is a complex process that requires detailed evidence gathering, careful analysis, local and international consultation and law drafting. For this reason, it takes time for MPAs to be established, but once in place the benefits to marine life and general marine environment will often extend far beyond the boundaries of the protected area.\n"],
    [196,54,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","\nMany seas, oceans and coastal regions suffer from the adverse effect of human activity and in response some governments have established Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to help restore and conserve fragile ecosystems. Jersey’s coastal waters are home to several internationally important habitats, the most notable of which are seagrass meadows, kelp forests and maerl, all of which play a role in local biodiversity and maintaining the health of our marine environment.\nThe protection of these habitats from potential threats has led to the establishment of a network of MPAs around Jersey and on the offshore reefs at Les Écréhous and Les Minquiers. These MPAs prohibit activities that most threaten the marine species and habitats, including the use of mobile fishing gear such as dredges and trawls. Creating and registering an MPA is a complex process that requires detailed evidence gathering, careful analysis, local and international consultation and law drafting. For this reason, it takes time for MPAs to be established, but once in place the benefits to marine life and general marine environment will often extend far beyond the boundaries of the protected area.  \nIn 2011, the area covered by Marine Protected Areas in Jersey's territorial waters increased from 31.00 in 2008 to 78.00.\n\n"],
    [197,54,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","\nMany seas, oceans and coastal regions suffer from the adverse effect of human activity and in response some governments have established Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to help restore and conserve fragile ecosystems. Jersey’s coastal waters are home to several internationally important habitats, the most notable of which are seagrass meadows, kelp forests and maerl, all of which play a role in local biodiversity and maintaining the health of our marine environment. \nThe protection of these habitats from potential threats has led to the establishment of a network of MPAs around Jersey and on the offshore reefs at Les Écréhous and Les Minquiers. These MPAs prohibit activities that most threaten the marine species and habitats, including the use of mobile fishing gear such as dredges and trawls. Creating and registering an MPA is a complex process that requires detailed evidence gathering, careful analysis, local and international consultation and law drafting. For this reason, it takes time for MPAs to be established, but once in place the benefits to marine life and general marine environment will often extend far beyond the boundaries of the protected area.   \nIn 2014, the area covered by Marine Protected Areas in Jersey's territorial waters increased from 78.00 in 2011 to 88.00.\n\n"],
    [198,54,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","\nMany seas, oceans and coastal regions suffer from the adverse effect of human activity and in response some governments have established Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to help restore and conserve fragile ecosystems. Jersey’s coastal waters are home to several internationally important habitats, the most notable of which are seagrass meadows, kelp forests and maerl, all of which play a role in local biodiversity and maintaining the health of our marine environment. \nThe protection of these habitats from potential threats has led to the establishment of a network of MPAs around Jersey and on the offshore reefs at Les Écréhous and Les Minquiers. These MPAs prohibit activities that most threaten the marine species and habitats, including the use of mobile fishing gear such as dredges and trawls. Creating and registering an MPA is a complex process that requires detailed evidence gathering, careful analysis, local and international consultation and law drafting. For this reason, it takes time for MPAs to be established, but once in place the benefits to marine life and general marine environment will often extend far beyond the boundaries of the protected area.   \nIn 2017, the area covered by Marine Protected Areas in Jersey's territorial waters increased from 88.00 in 2014 to 151.00.\n\n"],
    [199,54,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","\nMany seas, oceans and coastal regions suffer from the adverse effect of human activity and in response some governments have established Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to help restore and conserve fragile ecosystems. Jersey’s coastal waters are home to several internationally important habitats, the most notable of which are seagrass meadows, kelp forests and maerl, all of which play a role in local biodiversity and maintaining the health of our marine environment.\nThe protection of these habitats from potential threats has led to the establishment of a network of MPAs around Jersey and on the offshore reefs at Les Écréhous and Les Minquiers. These MPAs prohibit activities that most threaten the marine species and habitats, including the use of mobile fishing gear such as dredges and trawls. Creating and registering an MPA is a complex process that requires detailed evidence gathering, careful analysis, local and international consultation and law drafting. For this reason, it takes time for MPAs to be established, but once in place the benefits to marine life and general marine environment will often extend far beyond the boundaries of the protected area.   \nIn 2020, the area covered by Marine Protected Areas in Jersey's territorial waters remained at 151.00, the same as 2017.\n\n"],
    [200,54,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","\nMany seas, oceans and coastal regions suffer from the adverse effect of human activity and in response some governments have established Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to help restore and conserve fragile ecosystems. Jersey’s coastal waters are home to several internationally important habitats, the most notable of which are seagrass meadows, kelp forests and maerl, all of which play a role in local biodiversity and maintaining the health of our marine environment.\nThe protection of these habitats from potential threats has led to the establishment of a network of MPAs around Jersey and on the offshore reefs at Les Écréhous and Les Minquiers. These MPAs prohibit activities that most threaten the marine species and habitats, including the use of mobile fishing gear such as dredges and trawls. Creating and registering an MPA is a complex process that requires detailed evidence gathering, careful analysis, local and international consultation and law drafting. For this reason, it takes time for MPAs to be established, but once in place the benefits to marine life and general marine environment will often extend far beyond the boundaries of the protected area.\nThe area covered by Marine Protected Areas in Jersey's territorial waters has nearly doubled between 2013 and 2022.\n"],
    [201,55,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator is developed from a model that combines aerial mapping of the Island with data from the planning process. The term green space combines two formal land use categories: land under cultivation; and, natural environment. The latter includes woodlands, dunes, grassland, cliffs and shrub. This indicator divides the total amount of green space by Jersey's total land mass, excluding inland water (e.g. ponds, streams and reservoirs) and inter-tidal areas. \nIn 2012, 71.4% of the island consisted of land under cultivation or natural habitat. This figure does not include man-made green space such as private gardens, public parks, sports fields, and golf courses, which account for another 14% of Jersey's land mass.\n"],
    [202,55,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator is developed from a model that combines aerial mapping of the Island with data from the planning process. The term green space combines two formal land use categories: land under cultivation; and, natural environment. The latter includes woodlands, dunes, grassland, cliffs and shrub. This indicator divides the total amount of green space by Jersey's total land mass, excluding inland water (e.g. ponds, streams and reservoirs) and inter-tidal areas.   \nIn 2015, 71.1% of the island consisted of land under cultivation or natural habitat. This figure does not include man-made green space such as private gardens, public parks, sports fields, and golf courses, which account for another 14% of Jersey's land mass.\n"],
    [203,55,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator is developed from a model that combines aerial mapping of the Island with data from the planning process. The term green space combines two formal land use categories: land under cultivation; and, natural environment. The latter includes woodlands, dunes, grassland, cliffs and shrub. This indicator divides the total amount of green space by Jersey's total land mass, excluding inland water (e.g. ponds, streams and reservoirs) and inter-tidal areas. \nIn 2018, 70.9% of the island consisted of land under cultivation or natural habitat. This figure does not include man-made green space such as private gardens, public parks, sports fields, and golf courses, which account for another 14% of Jersey's land mass.\n"],
    [204,55,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator is developed from a model that combines aerial mapping of the Island with data from the planning process. The term green space combines two formal land use categories: land under cultivation; and, natural environment. The latter includes woodlands, dunes, grassland, cliffs and shrub. This indicator divides the total amount of green space by Jersey's total land mass, excluding inland water (e.g. ponds, streams and reservoirs) and inter-tidal areas. \nIn 2021, 70.6% of the island consisted of land under cultivation or natural habitat. This figure does not include man-made green space such as private gardens, public parks, sports fields, and golf courses, which account for another 14% of Jersey's land mass.\n"],
    [205,55,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator is developed from a model that combines aerial mapping of the Island with data from the planning process. The term green space combines two formal land use categories: land under cultivation; and, natural environment. The latter includes woodlands, dunes, grassland, cliffs and shrub. This indicator divides the total amount of green space by Jersey's total land mass, excluding inland water (e.g. ponds, streams and reservoirs) and inter-tidal areas. \nIn 2022, 70.6% of the Island consisted of land under cultivation or natural habitat. This figure does not include man-made green space such as private gardens, public parks, sports fields, and golf courses, which account for another 14% of Jersey's land mass.\n"],
    [206,56,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","\nGood sea water quality means much more than having a nice place to swim. It is a habitat for economically and ecologically important species and a critical resource for our fishing and tourism industries.\nThis indicator shows the percentage of 14 survey sites around the Island which overall classify the seawater as 'Excellent'.\nIn 2016 86% of the Jersey's bathing waters were classified being of excellent quality.\n"],
    [207,56,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","\nGood sea water quality means much more than having a nice place to swim. It is a habitat for economically and ecologically important species and a critical resource for our fishing and tourism industries.\nThis indicator shows the percentage of 14 survey sites around the Island which overall classify the seawater as 'Excellent'.\nIn 2018 64% of the Jersey's bathing waters were classified being of excellent quality.\n"],
    [208,56,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","\nGood sea water quality means much more than having a nice place to swim. It is a habitat for economically and ecologically important species and a critical resource for our fishing and tourism industries.\nThis indicator shows the percentage of 14 survey sites around the Island which overall classify the seawater as 'Excellent'.\nIn 2020 64% of the Jersey's bathing waters were classified being of excellent quality. \n"],
    [209,56,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","\nGood sea water quality means much more than having a nice place to swim. It is a habitat for economically and ecologically important species and a critical resource for our fishing and tourism industries.\nThis indicator shows the percentage of 14 survey sites around the Island which overall classify the seawater as 'Excellent'.\nIn 2022 71% of the Jersey's bathing waters were classified being of excellent quality.\n"],
    [210,56,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","\nGood sea water quality means much more than having a nice place to swim. It is a habitat for economically and ecologically important species and a critical resource for our fishing and tourism industries. \n\nThis indicator shows the percentage of 14 survey sites around the Island which overall classify the seawater as 'Excellent'. \nIn 2023 71% of the Jersey's bathing waters were classified being of excellent quality.\n"],
    [211,56,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","\nGood sea water quality means much more than having a nice place to swim. It is a habitat for economically and ecologically important species and a critical resource for our fishing and tourism industries. \n\nThis indicator shows the percentage of 16 survey sites around the Island which overall classify the seawater as 'Excellent'. \nIn 2025 75% of the Jersey's bathing waters were classified being of excellent quality.\n"],
    [212,57,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis new indicator tracks the extent of the countryside access routes available to the public. The substantial feedback to the public consultation on the 2016 Countryside Access Strategy highlighted the value that Islanders place on such access. It encourages community engagement with the outdoors and raises levels of personal connectivity with the natural world and environmental awareness in its broadest sense. In addition, it provides for people's sporting, recreational and leisure needs.  Jersey has an extensive network of paths across public and private land in some of the Island’s most beautiful landscapes. The paths are used by an estimated 100,000 people a year, including locals and visitors and they help meet wider strategic agendas for improving physical and mental health and wellbeing while adding a significant economic value to our landscape. Access should be, safe, sustainable, and cost effective, with minimal impact on biodiversity. It should also be available to everyone. The strategy aims to improve access for all different user groups by providing multi-user paths, adding new routes, improving connectivity and resilience of the network. \n\n"],
    [213,57,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis new indicator tracks the extent of the countryside access routes available to the public. The substantial feedback to the public consultation on the 2016 Countryside Access Strategy highlighted the value that Islanders place on such access. It encourages community engagement with the outdoors and raises levels of personal connectivity with the natural world and environmental awareness in its broadest sense. In addition, it provides for people's sporting, recreational and leisure needs.  Jersey has an extensive network of paths across public and private land in some of the Island’s most beautiful landscapes. The paths are used by an estimated 100,000 people a year, including locals and visitors and they help meet wider strategic agendas for improving physical and mental health and wellbeing while adding a significant economic value to our landscape. Access should be, safe, sustainable, and cost effective, with minimal impact on biodiversity. It should also be available to everyone. The strategy aims to improve access for all different user groups by providing multi-user paths, adding new routes, improving connectivity and resilience of the network. \n\n"],
    [214,58,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data shows the area (in hectares) of the largest intertidal seagrass (Zostera noltii) bed in St Aubin’s Bay. The measurement is made annually from the Government of Jersey’s aerial Island-wide photo, although some years the nature of the photo means that the area cannot be captured. There are two other areas for which seagrass data is collected (Grouville Bay and St Catherine’s Bay) but the St Aubin's site provides the most regular and reliable data.\nSeagrass is a marine plant which is sensitive to disturbance and changes in the local environment relating to salinity, sea chemistry light and nutrients. For this reason, seagrass is widely used as an indicator of coastal water quality and general environmental quality. Seagrass also plays an important role in local and global carbon budgets through the storage of carbon in its root systems.\nIn 2011 the abundance of and indicator species (area of seagrass beds in Jersey marine environment) was 81 hectares.\n"],
    [215,58,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data shows the area (in hectares) of the largest intertidal seagrass (Zostera noltii) bed in St Aubin’s Bay. The measurement is made annually from the Government of Jersey’s aerial Island-wide photo, although some years the nature of the photo means that the area cannot be captured. There are two other areas for which seagrass data is collected (Grouville Bay and St Catherine’s Bay) but the St Aubin's site provides the most regular and reliable data. \nSeagrass is a marine plant which is sensitive to disturbance and changes in the local environment relating to salinity, sea chemistry light and nutrients. For this reason, seagrass is widely used as an indicator of coastal water quality and general environmental quality. Seagrass also plays an important role in local and global carbon budgets through the storage of carbon in its root systems. \nIn 2014 the abundance of and indicator species (area of seagrass beds in Jersey marine environment) was 91 hectares.\n"],
    [216,58,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data shows the area (in hectares) of the largest intertidal seagrass (Zostera noltii) bed in St Aubin’s Bay. The measurement is made annually from the Government of Jersey’s aerial Island-wide photo, although some years the nature of the photo means that the area cannot be captured. There are two other areas for which seagrass data is collected (Grouville Bay and St Catherine’s Bay) but the St Aubin's site provides the most regular and reliable data. \nSeagrass is a marine plant which is sensitive to disturbance and changes in the local environment relating to salinity, sea chemistry light and nutrients. For this reason, seagrass is widely used as an indicator of coastal water quality and general environmental quality. Seagrass also plays an important role in local and global carbon budgets through the storage of carbon in its root systems. \nIn 2017 the abundance of and indicator species (area of seagrass beds in Jersey marine environment) was 89 hectares.\n"],
    [217,58,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data shows the area (in hectares) of the largest intertidal seagrass (Zostera noltii) bed in St Aubin’s Bay. The measurement is made annually from the Government of Jersey’s aerial Island-wide photo, although some years the nature of the photo means that the area cannot be captured. There are two other areas for which seagrass data is collected (Grouville Bay and St Catherine’s Bay) but the St Aubin's site provides the most regular and reliable data. \nSeagrass is a marine plant which is sensitive to disturbance and changes in the local environment relating to salinity, sea chemistry light and nutrients. For this reason, seagrass is widely used as an indicator of coastal water quality and general environmental quality. Seagrass also plays an important role in local and global carbon budgets through the storage of carbon in its root systems.\nIn 2022 the abundance of and indicator species (area of seagrass beds in Jersey marine environment) was 104 hectares.\n"],
    [218,61,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","\nThe sustainable use of Jersey's water resources is essential to individual and community wellbeing, and for the protection of biodiversity and ecological systems. Islanders' water supplies rely largely on rainfall-dependent surface water, which is captured and stored in six main reservoirs. When full, they can provide about 120 days supply, based on current average daily demand. A desalination plant can boost this supply when rainfall levels are low, but can only meet about 50% of daily demand. Managing future demand will be essential and this indicator tracks the overall consumption of treated mains water per head of population. \n\n\n\n\n"],
    [219,61,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","\nThe sustainable use of Jersey's water resources is essential to individual and community wellbeing, and for the protection of biodiversity and ecological systems. Islanders' water supplies rely largely on rainfall-dependent surface water, which is captured and stored in six main reservoirs. When full, they can provide about 120 days supply, based on current average daily demand. A desalination plant can boost this supply when rainfall levels are low, but can only meet about 50% of daily demand. Managing future demand will be essential and this indicator tracks the overall consumption of treated mains water per head of population. \nWater consumption per capita has reduced steadily from the 2011 rate of 73.4 thousand litres per capita to 71.0 thousand litres per capita in 2014.\n\n\n"],
    [220,61,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","\nThe sustainable use of Jersey's water resources is essential to individual and community wellbeing, and for the protection of biodiversity and ecological systems. Islanders' water supplies rely largely on rainfall-dependent surface water, which is captured and stored in six main reservoirs. When full, they can provide about 120 days supply, based on current average daily demand. A desalination plant can boost this supply when rainfall levels are low, but can only meet about 50% of daily demand. Managing future demand will be essential and this indicator tracks the overall consumption of treated mains water per head of population.\nWater consumption per capita increased steadily from the 2014 rate of 71.0 thousand litres per capita to 73.7 thousand litres per capita in 2016 before dropping to 71.5 thousand litres per capita in 2017.\n\n\n"],
    [221,61,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","\nThe sustainable use of Jersey's water resources is essential to individual and community wellbeing, and for the protection of biodiversity and ecological systems. Islanders' water supplies rely largely on rainfall-dependent surface water, which is captured and stored in six main reservoirs. When full, they can provide about 120 days supply, based on current average daily demand. A desalination plant can boost this supply when rainfall levels are low, but can only meet about 50% of daily demand. Managing future demand will be essential and this indicator tracks the overall consumption of treated mains water per head of population. \nWater consumption per capita has reduced steadily from the 2016 rate of 73.7 thousand litres per capita to 68.4 thousand litres per capita in 2020.\n\n\n\n"],
    [222,63,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator measures Jersey's energy consumption in tonnes of oil equivalent (toe) which represents the quantity of energy released by burning one tonne of crude oil. More efficient energy use will help to protect households and businesses from the impact of increasing international energy prices, as well as reducing Jersey’s greenhouse gas emissions. \n"],
    [223,63,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator measures Jersey's energy consumption in tonnes of oil equivalent (toe) which represents the quantity of energy released by burning one tonne of crude oil. More efficient energy use will help to protect households and businesses from the impact of increasing international energy prices, as well as reducing Jersey’s greenhouse gas emissions. \nIn 2014, final energy consumption per person in Jersey decreased from 1.62 tonnes of oil in 2011 to 1.49 tonnes.\n"],
    [224,63,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator measures Jersey's energy consumption in tonnes of oil equivalent (toe) which represents the quantity of energy released by burning one tonne of crude oil. More efficient energy use will help to protect households and businesses from the impact of increasing international energy prices, as well as reducing Jersey’s greenhouse gas emissions. \nIn 2017, final energy consumption per person in Jersey remained constant from 1.49 tonnes of oil in 2014 to 1.47 tonnes.\nPlease note that from 2015 the mid-year population estimates (from the Population & Migration Statistics Report 2011-2022) have been used to calculate this measure.\n"],
    [225,63,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator measures Jersey's energy consumption in tonnes of oil equivalent (toe) which represents the quantity of energy released by burning one tonne of crude oil. More efficient energy use will help to protect households and businesses from the impact of increasing international energy prices, as well as reducing Jersey’s greenhouse gas emissions.  \nIn 2020, final energy consumption per person in Jersey decreased from 1.47 tonnes of oil in 2017 to 1.30 tonnes. \nPlease note that from 2015 the mid-year population estimates (from the Population & Migration Statistics Report 2011-2022) have been used to calculate this measure.\n"],
    [226,63,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator measures Jersey's energy consumption in tonnes of oil equivalent (toe) which represents the quantity of energy released by burning one tonne of crude oil. More efficient energy use will help to protect households and businesses from the impact of increasing international energy prices, as well as reducing Jersey’s greenhouse gas emissions. \nIn 2018, final energy consumption per person in Jersey was 2% higher than in 2017. However, over the five years from 2014 to 2018, consumption has been relatively flat at around 150,000 toe, acknowledging the effect of warmer or colder winters.\nFEC per capita in Jersey from 2017 to 2022, has mostly remained around 1.3/1.4 toe. Energy consumption per head of population in Jersey in 2022 was below that of the UK (1.9 toe).\nPlease note that from 2015 the mid-year population estimates (from the Population & Migration Statistics Report 2011-2022) have been used to calculate this measure.\n"],
    [227,64,"2007-12-31T00:00:00","In March 2007, the UK's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol was extended to Jersey. The protocol requires Jersey to reduce its carbon emissions by 80% by 2050, relative to 1990 levels. This indicator tracks Jersey's performance in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), measured in kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (ktCOe). Please note that all back series have been updated due to methodology improvements made in line with the international best practice.\nIn 2007 Jersey’s emission level of greenhouse gases was 572.0 ktCOe - highest since records began.\n\n"],
    [228,64,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","In March 2007, the UK's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol was extended to Jersey. The protocol requires Jersey to reduce its carbon emissions by 80% by 2050, relative to 1990 levels. This indicator tracks Jersey's performance in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), measured in kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (ktCOe). Please note that all back series have been updated due to methodology improvements made in line with the international best practice.\nIn 2010 Jersey’s emission level of greenhouse gases decreased from 572.0 ktCOe in 2007 to 505.0 ktCOe.\n\n"],
    [229,64,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","In March 2007, the UK's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol was extended to Jersey. The protocol requires Jersey to reduce its carbon emissions by 80% by 2050, relative to 1990 levels. This indicator tracks Jersey's performance in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), measured in kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (ktCOe). Please note that all back series have been updated due to methodology improvements made in line with the international best practice.\nIn 2013 Jersey’s emission level of greenhouse gases increased from 505.0 ktCOe in 2010 to 543.0 ktCOe.\n\n"],
    [230,64,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","In March 2007, the UK's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol was extended to Jersey. The protocol requires Jersey to reduce its carbon emissions by 80% by 2050, relative to 1990 levels. This indicator tracks Jersey's performance in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), measured in kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (ktCOe). Please note that all back series have been updated due to methodology improvements made in line with the international best practice.\nIn 2016 Jersey’s emission level of greenhouse gases decreased from 543.0 ktCOe in 2013 to 454.0 ktCOe.\n\n"],
    [231,64,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","In March 2007, the UK's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol was extended to Jersey. The protocol requires Jersey to reduce its carbon emissions by 80% by 2050, relative to 1990 levels. This indicator tracks Jersey's performance in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), measured in kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (ktCOe). Please note that all back series have been updated due to methodology improvements made in line with the international best practice.\nIn 2019 Jersey’s emission level of greenhouse gases decreased  to 417.0 ktCOe - lowest since records began in 2007.\n\n"],
    [232,71,"2009-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator looks at whether a household with an average net income would be able to afford a median-priced property in Jersey. It does so by looking at the proportion of the required mortgage that the average household could afford to service. A working household with average net income has not been able to afford to service a mortgage on a median-priced house of any size in Jersey since 2002. \n"],
    [233,71,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator looks at whether a household with an average net income would be able to afford a median-priced property in Jersey. It does so by looking at the proportion of the required mortgage that the average household could afford to service. A working household with average net income has not been able to afford to service a mortgage on a median-priced house of any size in Jersey since 2002. \nIn 2012 the proportion of the required mortgage that an average household can afford has increased from 85% in 2009 to 92%.\n"],
    [234,71,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator looks at whether a household with an average net income would be able to afford a median-priced property in Jersey. It does so by looking at the proportion of the required mortgage that the average household could afford to service. A working household with average net income has not been able to afford to service a mortgage on a median-priced house of any size in Jersey since 2002. \nIn 2015 the proportion of the required mortgage that an average household can afford has reduced from 92% in 2012 to 86%.\n"],
    [235,71,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator looks at whether a household with an average net income would be able to afford a median-priced property in Jersey. It does so by looking at the proportion of the required mortgage that the average household could afford to service. A working household with average net income has not been able to afford to service a mortgage on a median-priced house of any size in Jersey since 2002.\nIn 2018 the proportion of the required mortgage that an average household can afford has reduced slightly from 86% in 2015 to 84%.\n"],
    [236,71,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator looks at whether a household with an average net income would be able to afford a median-priced property in Jersey. It does so by looking at the proportion of the required mortgage that the average household could afford to service. A working household with average net income has not been able to afford to service a mortgage on a median-priced house of any size in Jersey since 2002.\nIn 2021 the proportion of the required mortgage that an average household can afford has reduced from 84% in 2018 to 74%.\n"],
    [237,71,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator looks at whether a household with an average net income would be able to afford a median-priced property in Jersey. It does so by looking at the proportion of the required mortgage that the average household could afford to service. A working household with average net income has not been able to afford to service a mortgage on a median-priced house of any size in Jersey since 2002. Over the last decade, the proportion of the required mortgage that such a household could afford has reduced from about 90% to around 55% in 2023 - the lowest since 2009 records.\n\n"],
    [238,72,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","\nIf fewer people can afford to buy their own home, or there is an insufficient supply of social housing, the private rented sector becomes their only viable housing option. In a pressured rental market, lower income households will be the worst affected. This can lead to overcrowding, poorer housing choices and growing demand for social housing or income support. \nThis indicator uses an international definition of housing stress, which is the proportion of low income households that spend more than 30% of their income on rent. It focuses on low income households (those in the lowest 40% of the equivalised income distribution) because some higher earning households can afford to spend more than 30% of their non-equivalised income on rent. \n"],
    [239,72,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","\nIf fewer people can afford to buy their own home, or there is an insufficient supply of social housing, the private rented sector becomes their only viable housing option. In a pressured rental market, lower income households will be the worst affected. This can lead to overcrowding, poorer housing choices and growing demand for social housing or income support. \nThis indicator uses an international definition of housing stress, which is the proportion of low income households that spend more than 30% of their income on rent. It focuses on low income households (those in the lowest 40% of the equivalised income distribution) because some higher earning households can afford to spend more than 30% of their non-equivalised income on rent.\nThere are three main types of rental accommodation in Jersey: private rental for people with residential qualifications; unqualified private rental; and, social rental. This indicator focuses on private rental for people with residential qualifications, as this is the sector where the greatest proportion of households live in rental stress. \nThis indicator uses data collected by the Jersey Household Income and Spending Survey, which is run every five years. \nIn 2015, the percentage of low-income households in qualified private rental accommodation in rental stress increased from 52.0% in 2010 to 73.0%.\n"],
    [240,72,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","\nIf fewer people can afford to buy their own home, or there is an insufficient supply of social housing, the private rented sector becomes their only viable housing option. In a pressured rental market, lower income households will be the worst affected. This can lead to overcrowding, poorer housing choices and growing demand for social housing or income support. \nThis indicator uses an international definition of housing stress, which is the proportion of low income households that spend more than 30% of their income on rent. It focuses on low income households (those in the lowest 40% of the equivalised income distribution) because some higher earning households can afford to spend more than 30% of their non-equivalised income on rent. \nThere are three main types of rental accommodation in Jersey: private rental for people with residential qualifications; unqualified private rental; and, social rental. This indicator focuses on private rental for people with residential qualifications, as this is the sector where the greatest proportion of households live in rental stress. \nThis indicator uses data collected by the Jersey Household Income and Spending Survey, which is run every five years. \nIn 2022, the percentage of low-income households in qualified private rental accommodation in rental stress decreased slightly from 73.0% in 2015 to 72.0%.\n"],
    [241,72,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","\nIf fewer people can afford to buy their own home, or there is an insufficient supply of social housing, the private rented sector becomes their only viable housing option. In a pressured rental market, lower income households will be the worst affected. This can lead to overcrowding, poorer housing choices and growing demand for social housing or income support. \nThis indicator uses an international definition of housing stress, which is the proportion of low income households that spend more than 30% of their income on rent. It focuses on low income households (those in the lowest 40% of the equivalised income distribution) because some higher earning households can afford to spend more than 30% of their non-equivalised income on rent.\nThere are three main types of rental accommodation in Jersey: private rental for people with residential qualifications; unqualified private rental; and, social rental. This indicator focuses on private rental for people with residential qualifications, as this is the sector where the greatest proportion of households live in rental stress.\nThis indicator uses data collected by the Jersey Household Income and Spending Survey, which is run every five years. The last report was published in 2023.\n"],
    [242,73,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","\nAs well as considering the evidence on earnings, disposable income and relative low income, it is important to consider people's personal experience of making ends meet. This data is gathered using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS), which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked as a household, how easy or difficult they find it to cope financially and can answer: very easy; quite easy; neither easy nor difficult; quite difficult; or, very difficult. The indicator counts those who respond quite or very difficult as a proportion of total responses. \n"],
    [243,73,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","\nAs well as considering the evidence on earnings, disposable income and relative low income, it is important to consider people's personal experience of making ends meet. This data is gathered using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS), which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked as a household, how easy or difficult they find it to cope financially and can answer: very easy; quite easy; neither easy nor difficult; quite difficult; or, very difficult. The indicator counts those who respond quite or very difficult as a proportion of total responses. \nThe 2014 result showed a slight increase in proportion of Jersey households reporting that they were finding it difficult to cope financially, from 24% in 2010 to 26% in 2014. \n"],
    [244,73,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","\nAs well as considering the evidence on earnings, disposable income and relative low income, it is important to consider people's personal experience of making ends meet. This data is gathered using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS), which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked as a household, how easy or difficult they find it to cope financially and can answer: very easy; quite easy; neither easy nor difficult; quite difficult; or, very difficult. The indicator counts those who respond quite or very difficult as a proportion of total responses.\nThe 2019 result showed an increase in proportion of Jersey households reporting that they were finding it difficult to cope financially, from 26% in 2014 to 30% in 2019. \n"],
    [245,73,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","\nAs well as considering the evidence on earnings, disposable income and relative low income, it is important to consider people's personal experience of making ends meet. This data is gathered using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS), which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked as a household, how easy or difficult they find it to cope financially and can answer: very easy; quite easy; neither easy nor difficult; quite difficult; or, very difficult. The indicator counts those who respond quite or very difficult as a proportion of total responses. \nThe 2023 result showed an increase in proportion of Jersey households reporting that they were finding it difficult to cope financially, from 24% to 31% in 2023.  This is similar to the 30% reporting it difficult to cope financially in 2019.\n"],
    [246,74,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator is recognised internationally as a measure of the standard of living. It tracks the amount of money households have to spend or save after financial commitments such as taxes, social security and rates. The median household income is the point at which half of Jersey households have a higher income and half have a lower income. The data is sourced from Jersey's Household Spending and Income Survey which is run every five years, with the last being completed in 2015. The figures are adjusted through a process called equivalisation, to allow comparisons across different household sizes and make-up (e.g. numbers of children versus adults). They are also adjusted for inflation so comparisons can be made across years. \n"],
    [247,74,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator is recognised internationally as a measure of the standard of living. It tracks the amount of money households have to spend or save after financial commitments such as taxes, social security and rates. The median household income is the point at which half of Jersey households have a higher income and half have a lower income. The data is sourced from Jersey's Household Spending and Income Survey which is run every five years, with the last being completed in 2015. The figures are adjusted through a process called equivalisation, to allow comparisons across different household sizes and make-up (e.g. numbers of children versus adults). They are also adjusted for inflation so comparisons can be made across years.\nIn 2015 the real-terms median weekly household income after tax and benefits increased slightly from £667.00 in 2010 to £680.00.\n"],
    [248,74,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator is recognised internationally as a measure of the standard of living. It tracks the amount of money households have to spend or save after financial commitments such as taxes, social security and rates. The median household income is the point at which half of Jersey households have a higher income and half have a lower income. The data is sourced from Jersey's Household Spending and Income Survey which is run every five years, with the last being completed in 2015. The figures are adjusted through a process called equivalisation, to allow comparisons across different household sizes and make-up (e.g. numbers of children versus adults). They are also adjusted for inflation so comparisons can be made across years.\nIn 2020 the real-terms median weekly household income after tax and benefits increased from £680.00 in 2015 to £790.00.\n"],
    [249,74,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator is recognised internationally as a measure of the standard of living. It tracks the amount of money households have to spend or save after financial commitments such as taxes, social security and rates. The median household income is the point at which half of Jersey households have a higher income and half have a lower income. The data is sourced from Jersey's Household Spending and Income Survey which is run every five years, with the last being completed in 2015. The figures are adjusted through a process called equivalisation, to allow comparisons across different household sizes and make-up (e.g. numbers of children versus adults). They are also adjusted for inflation so comparisons can be made across years. Between 2010 and 2015, median weekly household income before housing costs decreased in real terms (i.e. taking into account the effect of inflation) by 7.6% from £736 to £680 a week, but this has now increased to £860 in 2022.\n"],
    [250,75,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator, based on the Living Cost and household income Survey (LCHIS), measures the percentage of Islanders living in low-income households, i.e. households that earn less than 60% of the median equivalised household income – after housing costs (AHC). \n"],
    [251,75,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator, based on the Living Cost and household income Survey (LCHIS), measures the percentage of Islanders living in low-income households, i.e. households that earn less than 60% of the median equivalised household income – after housing costs (AHC).\nIn 2015, the percentage of islanders who live in households that earn less than 60% of medium equivalised income – after housing cost increased from 19% in 2010 to 23%.\n"],
    [252,75,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator, based on the Living Cost and household income Survey (LCHIS), measures the percentage of Islanders living in low-income households, i.e. households that earn less than 60% of the median equivalised household income – after housing costs (AHC). \nIn 2020, the percentage of islanders who live in households that earn less than 60% of medium equivalised income – after housing cost decreased slightly from 23% in 2015 to 22%.\n"],
    [253,75,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator, based on the Living Cost and household income Survey (LCHIS), measures the percentage of Islanders living in low-income households, i.e. households that earn less than 60% of the median equivalised household income – after housing costs (AHC).\nThe percentage of Jersey residents living in households earning less than 60% of medium equivalised income - after housing costs was 19% in 2010. This increased to 23% in 2015 but has dropped back to 21% in 2022.\n"],
    [254,76,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked whether they gone without a variety of goods and services due to a shortage of money in the last 12 months. This indicator measures the percentage of respondents who have gone without at least one of these items due to a shortage of money.  \nIn 2022, 34% of households reported going without at least one of the list of goods due to a shortage of money.\n"],
    [255,76,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked whether they gone without a variety of goods and services due to a shortage of money in the last 12 months. This indicator measures the percentage of respondents who have gone without at least one of these items due to a shortage of money.\nIn 2023, 43% of households reported going without at least one of the list of goods due to a shortage of money.\n"],
    [256,76,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked whether they gone without a variety of goods and services due to a shortage of money in the last 12 months. This indicator measures the percentage of respondents who have gone without at least one of these items due to a shortage of money.\nIn 2025, 41% of households reported going without at least one of the list of goods due to a shortage of money.\n"],
    [257,77,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked if their household could afford an unexpected, but necessary, expense of £1000. This indicator is a simple percentage of those that responded 'no'. \nIn 2017, 31% of Jersey Households reported that they could not afford an unexpected but necessary expense of £1000.\n"],
    [258,77,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked if their household could afford an unexpected, but necessary, expense of £1000. This indicator is a simple percentage of those that responded 'no'. \nIn 2023, 36% of Jersey Households reported that they could not afford an unexpected but necessary expense of £1000, up from 31% in 2017.\n"],
    [259,77,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked if their household could afford an unexpected, but necessary, expense of £1,400. This indicator is a simple percentage of those that responded 'no'. In 2025, the value of the unexpected expense (previously £1000) has been updated, as an adjustment in line with inflation rate.\nIn 2025, 33% of Jersey Households reported that they could not afford an unexpected but necessary expense of £1,400.\n"],
    [260,78,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked if they spend too much, too little or about the right amount of time: at work; with family; with other social contacts; and on hobbies / interests. This indicator measures the percentage of people reporting too little time spent with friends, family or on hobbies / interests. \nIn 2013, 70% of islanders felt they had insufficient time for family, friends and leisure activities.\n\n"],
    [261,78,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked if they spend too much, too little or about the right amount of time: at work; with family; with other social contacts; and on hobbies / interests. This indicator measures the percentage of people reporting too little time spent with friends, family or on hobbies / interests. \nIn 2017, the percentage of islanders who felt they had insufficient time for family, friends and leisure activities increased from 70% in 2013 to 76%.\n\n\n"],
    [262,78,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked if they spend too much, too little or about the right amount of time: at work; with family; with other social contacts; and on hobbies / interests. This indicator measures the percentage of people reporting too little time spent with friends, family or on hobbies / interests.\nIn 2019, the percentage of islanders who felt they had insufficient time for family, friends and leisure activities increased from 76% in 2017 to 79%.\n\n\n"],
    [263,78,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked if they spend too much, too little or about the right amount of time: at work; with family; with other social contacts; and on hobbies / interests. This indicator measures the percentage of people reporting too little time spent with friends, family or on hobbies / interests.\nIn 2022, the percentage of islanders who felt they had insufficient time for family, friends and leisure activities decreased slightly, from 79% in 2019 to 75%.\n\n\n"],
    [264,91,"2000-12-31T00:00:00","\nIncreasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\n\n"],
    [265,91,"2004-12-31T00:00:00","\nIncreasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2004, the productivity index has been consistently decreasing from a high of 112.50 in 2000, to its lowest level of 100.00.\n\n\n"],
    [266,91,"2008-12-31T00:00:00","\nIncreasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2008, the productivity index saw a 7% decrease since previous year, following a considerable increase between 2005 - 2007, from 100.00 to 105.80.\n\n\n"],
    [267,91,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","\nIncreasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2012, the productivity index has been steadily decreasing over a three years period from 91.70 to 82.50\n\n\n"],
    [268,91,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","\nIncreasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2016, the productivity index has been steadily decreasing over a two years period from 85.00 in 2014 to 83.30\n\n\n"],
    [269,91,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","\nIncreasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2020, the productivity index saw a decrease from 81.70 in 2017 to 76.70\n\n\n"],
    [270,91,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","Increasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2023 the productivity index increased from 68.30 in 2021 to 78.30.\n\n"],
    [271,91,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","Increasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2024 the productivity index increased from 68.30 in 2021 to 77.30, however slighlty down since the previous year, by 1%.\n\n"],
    [272,92,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","\nGross Domestic Product (GDP) is the traditional aggregate measure of an economy which measures the total market value of all goods and services produced in Jersey. This indicator divides total GDP for a given year by the average population for that year to produce GDP per capita - the value of goods and services produced per person. This series accounts for inflation. All datapoints are shown in terms of the real-term value of the latest data point.\n\n"],
    [273,92,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","\nGross Domestic Product (GDP) is the traditional aggregate measure of an economy which measures the total market value of all goods and services produced in Jersey. This indicator divides total GDP for a given year by the average population for that year to produce GDP per capita - the value of goods and services produced per person. This series accounts for inflation. All datapoints are shown in terms of the real-term value of the latest data point.\n\nSince 2012, GDP per capita has made a slow increase.\n\n"],
    [274,92,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","\nGross Domestic Product (GDP) is the traditional aggregate measure of an economy which measures the total market value of all goods and services produced in Jersey. This indicator divides total GDP for a given year by the average population for that year to produce GDP per capita - the value of goods and services produced per person. This series accounts for inflation. All datapoints are shown in terms of the real-term value of the latest data point.\n\nIn 2018, GDP per capita has made a slow increase.\n\n"],
    [275,92,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","\nGross Domestic Product (GDP) is the traditional aggregate measure of an economy which measures the total market value of all goods and services produced in Jersey. This indicator divides total GDP for a given year by the average population for that year to produce GDP per capita - the value of goods and services produced per person. This series accounts for inflation. All datapoints are shown in terms of the real-term value of the latest data point.\n\nIn 2018, GDP per capita has made a slow increase.\n\n"],
    [276,92,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the traditional aggregate measure of an economy which measures the total market value of all goods and services produced in Jersey. This indicator divides total GDP for a given year by the average population for that year to produce GDP per capita - the value of goods and services produced per person. This series accounts for inflation. All datapoints are shown in terms of the real-term value of the latest data point.\n\nAfter a slow increase from 2013 to 2019, GDP per capita dropped in 2020 due to Covid-19 before increasing more rapidly to 2022.\n\n"],
    [277,93,"2006-12-31T00:00:00","\nEarning an adequate wage has a big impact on Islanders' ability to afford a good standard of living. If earnings are growing faster than inflation, it shows that people in work are better off. This indicator tracks the change in mean average earnings in Jersey over time. It is presented as an index set at 100 in 1990 so that the change in the real value of earnings can be compared by allowing for inflation.\n"],
    [278,93,"2009-12-31T00:00:00","\nEarning an adequate wage has a big impact on Islanders' ability to afford a good standard of living. If earnings are growing faster than inflation, it shows that people in work are better off. This indicator tracks the change in mean average earnings in Jersey over time. It is presented as an index set at 100 in 1990 so that the change in the real value of earnings can be compared by allowing for inflation. \nIn 2009 the change in the value of average earnings allowing for the effect of inflation has increased since 2006.\n\n"],
    [279,93,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","\nEarning an adequate wage has a big impact on Islanders' ability to afford a good standard of living. If earnings are growing faster than inflation, it shows that people in work are better off. This indicator tracks the change in mean average earnings in Jersey over time. It is presented as an index set at 100 in 1990 so that the change in the real value of earnings can be compared by allowing for inflation. \nIn 2012 the change in the value of average earnings allowing for the effect of inflation has decreased since 2009.\n\n"],
    [280,93,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","\nEarning an adequate wage has a big impact on Islanders' ability to afford a good standard of living. If earnings are growing faster than inflation, it shows that people in work are better off. This indicator tracks the change in mean average earnings in Jersey over time. It is presented as an index set at 100 in 1990 so that the change in the real value of earnings can be compared by allowing for inflation.\nIn 2015 the change in the value of average earnings allowing for the effect of inflation has slightly increased since 2012.\n\n"],
    [281,93,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","\nEarning an adequate wage has a big impact on Islanders' ability to afford a good standard of living. If earnings are growing faster than inflation, it shows that people in work are better off. This indicator tracks the change in mean average earnings in Jersey over time. It is presented as an index set at 100 in 1990 so that the change in the real value of earnings can be compared by allowing for inflation.\nIn 2018 the change in the value of average earnings allowing for the effect of inflation has remained the same since 2015.\n\n"],
    [282,93,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","\nEarning an adequate wage has a big impact on Islanders' ability to afford a good standard of living. If earnings are growing faster than inflation, it shows that people in work are better off. This indicator tracks the change in mean average earnings in Jersey over time. It is presented as an index set at 100 in 1990 so that the change in the real value of earnings can be compared by allowing for inflation. The Covid-19 pandemic has inevitably had a significant impact on the 2020 results. The latest annual increase in average earnings in the private sector was the lowest recorded since private sector earnings were first reported separately in 1995, but this was balanced by an exceptionally low inflation rate in June 2020. This was driven by temporary government relief measures (e.g. withdrawal of parking charges). \nIn 2021 the change in the value of average earnings allowing for the effect of inflation has remained the same since 2018.\n"],
    [283,93,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","\nEarning an adequate wage has a big impact on Islanders' ability to afford a good standard of living. If earnings are growing faster than inflation, it shows that people in work are better off. This indicator tracks the change in mean average earnings in Jersey over time. It is presented as an index set at 100 in 1990 so that the change in the real value of earnings can be compared by allowing for inflation. The Covid-19 pandemic has inevitably had a significant impact on the 2020 results. The latest annual increase in average earnings in the private sector was the lowest recorded since private sector earnings were first reported separately in 1995, but this was balanced by an exceptionally low inflation rate in June 2020. This was driven by temporary government relief measures (e.g. withdrawal of parking charges). \nFollowing two years of small real-term decreases (when inflation outpaced average earnings), Jersey's real terms average earnings index increased by 1.9% between June 2019 and June 2020. Over the longer term, average earnings in Jersey have essentially remained flat in real terms since 2001, with gains made up until 2009 being lost in the subsequent decade.    \nAll-sector average earnings in June 2023 were 2.8% lower than in June 2022 in real terms and remain below the level seen in June 2009.  In June 2023 the lowest paid sectors were hospitality, wholesale and retail, and other business activities, (pay per FTE). Together these sectors made up 30% of all jobs in June 2023.\n"],
    [284,65,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","\nCombustion processes emit a mixture of oxides of nitrogen - NO and NO2 - collectively termed NOx. \nNO2 can have a wide range of effects on human health, dependent on exposure times and concentrations. Short-term exposure can inflame and irritate airways. In addition, exposure can lead to reduced lung function and increased risk of respiratory illnesses, especially childhood asthma. NO2 is also involved in the formation of photochemical smog and acid rain and may cause damage to crops and vegetation.\n\nThe EC directive limit (and Jersey's 2013 Air Quality Strategy objective) for the annual mean NO2 concentration is 40 g m3.The NO2 concentration has reduced steadily from 31 g m3 in 2014 to 15.5 g m3 in 2023. In 2022 the reference analyser was moved from Halkett Place to Beresford Street resulting in a further reduction likely due to the influence of delivery vehicles and refuse lorry emissions at Halkett Place.\n\n"],
    [285,65,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","\nCombustion processes emit a mixture of oxides of nitrogen - NO and NO2 - collectively termed NOx. \nNO2 can have a wide range of effects on human health, dependent on exposure times and concentrations. Short-term exposure can inflame and irritate airways. In addition, exposure can lead to reduced lung function and increased risk of respiratory illnesses, especially childhood asthma. NO2 is also involved in the formation of photochemical smog and acid rain and may cause damage to crops and vegetation.\n\nThe EC directive limit (and Jersey's 2013 Air Quality Strategy objective) for the annual mean NO2 concentration is 40 g m3.The NO2 concentration has reduced steadily from 18 g m3 in 2021 to 15 g m3 in 2024. In 2022 the reference analyser was moved from Halkett Place to Beresford Street resulting in a further reduction likely due to the influence of delivery vehicles and refuse lorry emissions at Halkett Place.\n\n"],
    [286,65,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","\nCombustion processes emit a mixture of oxides of nitrogen - NO and NO2 - collectively termed NOx. \nNO2 can have a wide range of effects on human health, dependent on exposure times and concentrations. Short-term exposure can inflame and irritate airways. In addition, exposure can lead to reduced lung function and increased risk of respiratory illnesses, especially childhood asthma. NO2 is also involved in the formation of photochemical smog and acid rain and may cause damage to crops and vegetation.\n\nThe EC directive limit (and Jersey's 2013 Air Quality Strategy objective) for the annual mean NO2 concentration is 40 g m3."],
    [287,65,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","\nCombustion processes emit a mixture of oxides of nitrogen - NO and NO2 - collectively termed NOx. \nNO2 can have a wide range of effects on human health, dependent on exposure times and concentrations. Short-term exposure can inflame and irritate airways. In addition, exposure can lead to reduced lung function and increased risk of respiratory illnesses, especially childhood asthma. NO2 is also involved in the formation of photochemical smog and acid rain and may cause damage to crops and vegetation.\n\nThe EC directive limit (and Jersey's 2013 Air Quality Strategy objective) for the annual mean NO2 concentration is 40 g m3. The NO2 concentration has reduced steadily from 31 g m3 in 2014 to 24 g m3 in 2017.\n\n\n"],
    [288,65,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","\nCombustion processes emit a mixture of oxides of nitrogen - NO and NO2 - collectively termed NOx. \nNO2 can have a wide range of effects on human health, dependent on exposure times and concentrations. Short-term exposure can inflame and irritate airways. In addition, exposure can lead to reduced lung function and increased risk of respiratory illnesses, especially childhood asthma. NO2 is also involved in the formation of photochemical smog and acid rain and may cause damage to crops and vegetation.\n\nThe EC directive limit (and Jersey's 2013 Air Quality Strategy objective) for the annual mean NO2 concentration is 40 g m3.  The NO2 concentration has reduced steadily from 31 g m3 in 2014 to 18 g m3 in 2021.\n\n"],
    [289,65,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","\nCombustion processes emit a mixture of oxides of nitrogen - NO and NO2 - collectively termed NOx. \nNO2 can have a wide range of effects on human health, dependent on exposure times and concentrations. Short-term exposure can inflame and irritate airways. In addition, exposure can lead to reduced lung function and increased risk of respiratory illnesses, especially childhood asthma. NO2 is also involved in the formation of photochemical smog and acid rain and may cause damage to crops and vegetation.\n\nThe EC directive limit (and Jersey's 2013 Air Quality Strategy objective) for the annual mean NO2 concentration is 40 g m3.The NO2 concentration has reduced steadily from 31 g m3 in 2014 to 17 g m3 in 2022. In 2022 the reference analyser was moved from Halkett Place to Beresford Street resulting in a further reduction, likely due to the influence of delivery vehicles and refuse lorry emissions at Halkett Place.\n\n\n\n"],
    [290,95,"2023-06-27T00:00:00","The median earnings index tracks the change in median earnings over time. It accounts for seasonal changes in the most frequently contracted hours by comparing months on the same basis. Whilst often this results in very minor differences to the trend of earnings, it is important to do this so that any large changes in hours worked in sectors are accounted for.\n Nominal earnings can be adjusted using the Retail Prices Index (RPI) to provide real-term values (adjusted for inflation). As the RPI is only produced quarterly, the real-term index has to be interpolated between points. Quarterly changes in the RPI are split evenly across the three months of the quarter.\n \nThe Gini coefficient is an internationally recognised measure of income inequality, which aims to summarise the degree of sharing of income. For the Earnings in Jersey index, it summarises the degree of sharing of earnings across jobs. A Gini coefficient of zero indicates that earnings are evenly spread across jobs, with each job receiving the same proportion of earnings (that is, complete equality); whilst a Gini coefficient of one would represent a single job in the population receiving all the earnings and the rest of the population receiving nothing (that is, complete inequality).\n"],
    [291,95,"2024-06-27T00:00:00","The median earnings index tracks the change in median earnings over time. It accounts for seasonal changes in the most frequently contracted hours by comparing months on the same basis. Whilst often this results in very minor differences to the trend of earnings, it is important to do this so that any large changes in hours worked in sectors are accounted for.\n Nominal earnings can be adjusted using the Retail Prices Index (RPI) to provide real-term values (adjusted for inflation). As the RPI is only produced quarterly, the real-term index has to be interpolated between points. Quarterly changes in the RPI are split evenly across the three months of the quarter.\n \nThe Gini coefficient is an internationally recognised measure of income inequality, which aims to summarise the degree of sharing of income. For the Earnings in Jersey index, it summarises the degree of sharing of earnings across jobs. A Gini coefficient of zero indicates that earnings are evenly spread across jobs, with each job receiving the same proportion of earnings (that is, complete equality); whilst a Gini coefficient of one would represent a single job in the population receiving all the earnings and the rest of the population receiving nothing (that is, complete inequality).\n"],
    [292,45,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator shows the number of structures which are listed listed as heritage assets and afforded protection. The number of heritage assets should be maintained and added to; protecting Jersey's historical buildings and structures for future generations.\n2018 saw the addition of heritage assets (c300+) as island-wide review of heritage assets is largely completed.\n"],
    [293,45,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator shows the number of structures which are listed listed as heritage assets and afforded protection. The number of heritage assets should be maintained and added to; protecting Jersey's history for future generations.\nIn 2019 three additional ecclesiastical buildings were added to the heritage asset list.\n"],
    [294,45,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator shows the number of structures which are listed listed as heritage assets and afforded protection. The number of heritage assets should be maintained and added to; protecting Jersey's history for future generations.\n2020 saw the net loss of two heritage assets associated due to development activity ([HE0029] 82 Bath Street, and [HE0531] 92 Bath Street).\n"],
    [295,45,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator shows the number of structures which are listed listed as heritage assets and afforded protection. The number of heritage assets should be maintained and added to; protecting Jersey's history for future generations.\nSix additional listings were made in 2022; including La Fregate; together with some medieval field systems revealed through the use of LiDAR surveying.\n\n\nTwo heritage assets were lost as a consequence of development ([HE0837] 28-30 Cannon Street; and [HE0582] 8-9 Esplanade).\n\n"],
    [296,45,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator shows the number of structures which are listed listed as heritage assets and afforded protection. The number of heritage assets should be maintained and added to; protecting Jersey's history for future generations.\nOne listed building was lost in 2023 as a consequence of development activity ([HE1692] 33 Broad Street)\n"],
    [297,45,"2024-07-01T00:00:00","This indicator shows the number of structures which are listed listed as heritage assets and afforded protection. The number of heritage assets should be maintained and added to; protecting Jersey's history for future generations.\nTo June 2024, one additional asset added to the list where an historic building is under threat of development. Listing is the subject of an appeal ([TR0248] Trinity Grange) "],
    [298,17,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis data is collected using the Jersey Children and Young People's Survey. Secondary school years 8, 10 and 12 are asked to what extent they agree or disagree with the statement \"I trust the adults in my school to quickly take the right action to resolve any concerns I have\". This indicator tracks the proportion of children who either agree or strongly agree with the statement.\nThis question is due to be asked again in the 2024 school survey with data being available in spring 2025.\nPrimary school aged children are asked a similar question but their response are not used in this measure.\n\n\n"],
    [299,66,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\n\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have fallen consistently from a high of 61.7 mg/L in 2002 to 38.5mg/L in 2023.\n\n"],
    [300,66,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\n\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have fallen consistently from a high of 42.5 mg/L in 2020 to 38.9mg/L in 2024.\n\n"],
    [301,66,"2002-01-01T00:00:00","\nSurface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\n\n\n\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\n\n\n\n"],
    [302,66,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","\nSurface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\n\n\n\n\n\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have fallen consistently from a high of 61.7 mg/L in 2002 to 47.6 mg/L in 2016.\n\n"],
    [303,1,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","Most people use Jersey’s roads every day, as drivers, passengers, cyclists and pedestrians and they should be able to do so safely.  This indicator tracks the number of collisions in which people are either killed or seriously injured (as defined by national police recording rules). This is the most reliable measure because such incidents are the most likely to be reported to the police. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time.\n2016 saw a similar rate of serious road traffic collisions resulting in serious injury per 1,000 population, from 0.68 per 1,000 in 2015 to 0.69 in 2016. This figure was revised from 0.67 to 0.69 in October 2024 due to revised population estimates.\n\n\n"],
    [304,1,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","\nMost people use Jersey’s roads every day, as drivers, passengers, cyclists and pedestrians and they should be able to do so safely.  This indicator tracks the number of collisions in which people are either killed or seriously injured (as defined by national police recording rules). This is the most reliable measure because such incidents are the most likely to be reported to the police. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time.\n\n\n\n2017 saw a decrease in the rate of serious road traffic collisions resulting in serious injury per 1,000 population, from 0.69 per 1,000 in 2016 to 0.57 in 2017. This figure was revised from 0.53 to 0.57 in October 2024 due to revised population estimates.\n\n"],
    [305,1,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","\nMost people use Jersey’s roads every day, as drivers, passengers, cyclists and pedestrians and they should be able to do so safely.  This indicator tracks the number of collisions in which people are either killed or seriously injured (as defined by national police recording rules). This is the most reliable measure because such incidents are the most likely to be reported to the police. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time.\n\n\n\n2019 saw a further decrease in the rate of serious road traffic collisions resulting in serious injury per 1,000 population, from 0.51 per 1,000 in 2018 to 0.42 in 2019. This figure was revised from 0.40 to 0.42 in October 2024 due to revised population estimates.\n\n"],
    [306,1,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","\nMost people use Jersey’s roads every day, as drivers, passengers, cyclists and pedestrians and they should be able to do so safely.  This indicator tracks the number of collisions in which people are either killed or seriously injured (as defined by national police recording rules). This is the most reliable measure because such incidents are the most likely to be reported to the police. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time.\n\n\n2020 saw a slight increase in the rate of serious road traffic collisions resulting in serious injury per 1,000 population, from 0.42 per 1,000 in 2019 to 0.47 in 2020. This figure was revised from 0.45 to 0.47 in October 2024 due to revised population estimates.\n\n"],
    [307,1,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","\nMost people use Jersey’s roads every day, as drivers, passengers, cyclists and pedestrians and they should be able to do so safely.  This indicator tracks the number of collisions in which people are either killed or seriously injured (as defined by national police recording rules). This is the most reliable measure because such incidents are the most likely to be reported to the police. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time.\n\n\n\n2022 saw an increase in the rate of serious road traffic collisions resulting in serious injury per 1,000 population, from 0.43 per 1,000 in 2021 to 0.59 in 2022. \n\n"],
    [308,3,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","\nThe number of crimes recorded by the police is widely used internationally to provide an overview of community safety over time. This indicator combines the number of crimes recorded by the police with demographic data to take into account changes in population. It should be noted that police recorded crime statistics can be affected by changes in policing activity and recording practice and by the willingness of victims to report. As such, they can only cover crimes that come to the attention of the police. The headline figures also hides variations both within and across crime types. As such, this indicator is a useful supplement to other indicators on community safety and should invite analysis to understand the reasons behind significant variations over time.\n\n\n\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. 2015 saw a decrease in the number of crimes recorded by the police, from 31.0, per 1,000 in 2014 to 30.7 in 2015. (The figure was adjusted from 30.1 to 30.7 in October 2024 due to population estimate revisions).\n"],
    [309,3,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","The number of crimes recorded by the police is widely used internationally to provide an overview of community safety over time. This indicator combines the number of crimes recorded by the police with demographic data to take into account changes in population. It should be noted that police recorded crime statistics can be affected by changes in policing activity and recording practice and by the willingness of victims to report. As such, they can only cover crimes that come to the attention of the police. The headline figures also hides variations both within and across crime types. As such, this indicator is a useful supplement to other indicators on community safety and should invite analysis to understand the reasons behind significant variations over time.\n\n\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. 2016 saw a decrease in the number of crimes recorded by the police, from 30.7, per 1,000 in 2014 to 28.5 in 2016. (The 2016 figure was adjusted from 27.8 to 28.5 in October 2024 due to population estimate revisions).\n\n"],
    [310,3,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","\nThe number of crimes recorded by the police is widely used internationally to provide an overview of community safety over time. This indicator combines the number of crimes recorded by the police with demographic data to take into account changes in population. It should be noted that police recorded crime statistics can be affected by changes in policing activity and recording practice and by the willingness of victims to report. As such, they can only cover crimes that come to the attention of the police. The headline figures also hides variations both within and across crime types. As such, this indicator is a useful supplement to other indicators on community safety and should invite analysis to understand the reasons behind significant variations over time.\n\n\n\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. 2017 saw a slight increase in the rate of crimes recorded by the police, from 28.5, per 1,000 in 2016 to 29.6 in 2017. (The 2017 figure was adjusted from 29.0 to 29.6 in October 2024 due to population estimate revisions).\n\n\n"],
    [311,3,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","\nThe number of crimes recorded by the police is widely used internationally to provide an overview of community safety over time. This indicator combines the number of crimes recorded by the police with demographic data to take into account changes in population. It should be noted that police recorded crime statistics can be affected by changes in policing activity and recording practice and by the willingness of victims to report. As such, they can only cover crimes that come to the attention of the police. The headline figures also hides variations both within and across crime types. As such, this indicator is a useful supplement to other indicators on community safety and should invite analysis to understand the reasons behind significant variations over time.\n\n\n\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. 2018 saw an increase in the rate of crimes recorded by the police, from 29.6, per 1,000 in 2017 to 31.9 in 2018. (The 2018 figure was adjusted from 30.7 to 31.9 in October 2024 due to population estimate revisions).\n\n"],
    [312,3,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","\nThe number of crimes recorded by the police is widely used internationally to provide an overview of community safety over time. This indicator combines the number of crimes recorded by the police with demographic data to take into account changes in population. It should be noted that police recorded crime statistics can be affected by changes in policing activity and recording practice and by the willingness of victims to report. As such, they can only cover crimes that come to the attention of the police. The headline figures also hides variations both within and across crime types. As such, this indicator is a useful supplement to other indicators on community safety and should invite analysis to understand the reasons behind significant variations over time.\n\n\n\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. 2019 saw an increase in the rate of crimes recorded by the police, from 31.9 per 1,000 in 2018 to 32.9 in 2019. (The 2019 figure was adjusted from 31.5 to 32.9 in October 2024 due to population estimate revisions).\n\n"],
    [313,3,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","\nThe number of crimes recorded by the police is widely used internationally to provide an overview of community safety over time. This indicator combines the number of crimes recorded by the police with demographic data to take into account changes in population. It should be noted that police recorded crime statistics can be affected by changes in policing activity and recording practice and by the willingness of victims to report. As such, they can only cover crimes that come to the attention of the police. The headline figures also hides variations both within and across crime types. As such, this indicator is a useful supplement to other indicators on community safety and should invite analysis to understand the reasons behind significant variations over time.\n\n\n\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. 2020 saw a decrease in the rate of crimes recorded by the police, from 32.9, per 1,000 in 2019 to 28.7 in 2020. (The 2020 figure was adjusted from 27.6 to 28.7 in October 2024 due to population estimate revisions).\n\n"],
    [314,3,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","\nThe number of crimes recorded by the police is widely used internationally to provide an overview of community safety over time. This indicator combines the number of crimes recorded by the police with demographic data to take into account changes in population. It should be noted that police recorded crime statistics can be affected by changes in policing activity and recording practice and by the willingness of victims to report. As such, they can only cover crimes that come to the attention of the police. The headline figures also hides variations both within and across crime types. As such, this indicator is a useful supplement to other indicators on community safety and should invite analysis to understand the reasons behind significant variations over time.\n\n\n\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. 2021 saw an increase in the rate of crimes recorded by the police, from 28.7, per 1,000 in 2020 to 30.1 in 2021. \n"],
    [315,3,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","\nThe number of crimes recorded by the police is widely used internationally to provide an overview of community safety over time. This indicator combines the number of crimes recorded by the police with demographic data to take into account changes in population. It should be noted that police recorded crime statistics can be affected by changes in policing activity and recording practice and by the willingness of victims to report. As such, they can only cover crimes that come to the attention of the police. The headline figures also hides variations both within and across crime types. As such, this indicator is a useful supplement to other indicators on community safety and should invite analysis to understand the reasons behind significant variations over time.\n\n\n\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. 2022 saw a slight decrease in the rate of crimes recorded by the police, from 30.1, per 1,000 in 2021 to 29.6 in 2022. (The 2022 figure was adjusted from 29.2 to 29.6 in October 2024 due to population estimate revisions).\n\n"],
    [316,3,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","\nThe number of crimes recorded by the police is widely used internationally to provide an overview of community safety over time. This indicator combines the number of crimes recorded by the police with demographic data to take into account changes in population. It should be noted that police recorded crime statistics can be affected by changes in policing activity and recording practice and by the willingness of victims to report. As such, they can only cover crimes that come to the attention of the police. The headline figures also hides variations both within and across crime types. As such, this indicator is a useful supplement to other indicators on community safety and should invite analysis to understand the reasons behind significant variations over time.\n\n\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. 2023 saw a slight increase in the rate of crimes recorded by the police, from 29.6, per 1,000 in 2022 to 30.5 in 2023."],
    [317,61,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","The sustainable use of Jersey's water resources is essential to individual and community wellbeing, and for the protection of biodiversity and ecological systems. Islanders' water supplies rely largely on rainfall-dependent surface water, which is captured and stored in six main reservoirs. When full, they can provide about 120 days supply, based on current average daily demand. A desalination plant can boost this supply when rainfall levels are low, but can only meet about 50% of daily demand. Managing future demand will be essential and this indicator tracks the overall consumption of treated mains water per head of population. \nWater consumption per capita has reduced steadily from the 2016 rate of 73.7 thousand litres per capita to 64.8 thousand litres per capita in 2023; a reduction of 12%.\nFigures were adjusted slightly in October 2024 to account for updated population estimates.\n\n"],
    [318,61,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","The sustainable use of Jersey's water resources is essential to individual and community wellbeing, and for the protection of biodiversity and ecological systems. Islanders' water supplies rely largely on rainfall-dependent surface water, which is captured and stored in six main reservoirs. When full, they can provide about 120 days supply, based on current average daily demand. A desalination plant can boost this supply when rainfall levels are low, but can only meet about 50% of daily demand. Managing future demand will be essential and this indicator tracks the overall consumption of treated mains water per head of population. \nWater consumption per capita has increased from 64.80 in 2023 to 66.70.\nFigures were adjusted slightly in October 2024 to account for updated population estimates.\n\n"],
    [319,83,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","The number of larger businesses is an indicator of a healthy economy; where business start-ups can grow to a stage of increased production and employing multiple staff. \n\nIn 2023 there were 480 businesses in Jersey employing 20 or more staff; this is similar to the number in 2022 but an increase of over 35% from the 350 businesses in 2010.\n"],
    [320,83,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","The number of larger businesses is an indicator of a healthy economy; where business start-ups can grow to a stage of increased production and employing multiple staff. \n\nIn 2024 there were 470 businesses in Jersey employing 20 or more staff; a slight decrease comparing to the previous two years.\n"],
    [321,83,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","The number of larger businesses is an indicator of a healthy economy; where business start-ups can grow to a stage of increased production and employing multiple staff. \n\nIn 2010 there were 350 businesses employing 20 or more staff.\n\n\n"],
    [322,83,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","\nThe number of larger businesses is an indicator of a healthy economy; where business start-ups can grow to a stage of increased production and employing multiple staff. \n\n\nIn 2015 there were 410 businesses in Jersey employing 20 or more staff; an increase of over 15% from the 350 businesses in 2010.\n\n"],
    [323,83,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","\nThe number of larger businesses is an indicator of a healthy economy; where business start-ups can grow to a stage of increased production and employing multiple staff. \n\n\nIn 2020 there were 440 businesses in Jersey employing 20 or more staff; a decrease from the 460 businesses in 2019 (probably due in part to Covid) but still an increase of 25% from the 350 businesses in 2010.\n\n\n\n\n"],
    [324,83,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","\nThe number of larger businesses is an indicator of a healthy economy; where business start-ups can grow to a stage of increased production and employing multiple staff. \n\n\nIn 2022 there were 480 businesses in Jersey employing 20 or more staff. This is above pre-Covid levels and an increase of over 35% from the 350 businesses in 2010.\n\n\n\n"],
    [325,62,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","In 2022 a new method of analysing and reporting waste and recycling was introduced which follows a waste hierarchy. This prioritises (non-inert) waste prevention and reduction before considering reuse, recycling and recovery. \nA time series using this methodology has been calculated back to 2015 (the start of this data series). In line with the waste hierarchy model, this indicator tracks the total (non-inert) waste per capita.\nWaste per person increased from 1.05T in 2022 to 1.09T in 2023 but in the longer term it has reduced from its high of 1.19T in 2016.\n\n"],
    [326,62,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","In 2022 a new method of analysing and reporting waste and recycling was introduced which follows a waste hierarchy. This prioritises (non-inert) waste prevention and reduction before considering reuse, recycling and recovery. \nA time series using this methodology has been calculated back to 2015 (the start of this data series). In line with the waste hierarchy model, this indicator tracks the total (non-inert) waste per capita.\nIn 2015 the total non-inert waste produced per capita was 1.17T\n"],
    [327,46,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator rates St Helier as a place to work and visit with data regularly collected in the Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS). The indicator is a combination (mean average) of the percentages of JOLS respondents that rate St Helier who report being 'very satisfied' with St Helier as a place to work, and to visit.\n\nIn 2015, 29% of Islanders were 'very satisfied' with St Helier as a place to work, and 20% were 'very satisfied' with St Hellier as a place to visit: averaging 25%.\n"],
    [328,46,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator rates St Helier as a place to work and visit with data regularly collected in the Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS). The indicator is a combination (mean average) of the percentages of JOLS respondents that rate St Helier who report being 'very satisfied' with St Helier as a place to work, and to visit.\n\nIn 2018, 37% of Islanders were 'very satisfied' with St Helier as a place to work, and 22% were 'very satisfied' with St Helier as a place to visit: averaging 29% (up from 25% in 2015).\n"],
    [329,46,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator rates St Helier as a place to work and visit with data regularly collected in the Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS). The indicator is a combination (mean average) of the percentages of JOLS respondents that rate St Helier who report being 'very satisfied' with St Helier as a place to work, and to visit.\n\nIn 2022, 27% of Islanders were 'very satisfied' with St Helier as a place to work, and 16% were 'very satisfied' with St Helier as a place to visit: averaging 21% (an 8 percentage point drop from 29% in 2018).\n"],
    [330,45,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator shows the number of structures which are listed listed as heritage assets and afforded protection. The number of heritage assets should be maintained and added to; protecting Jersey's history for future generations.\n\nIn 2017, 3919 structures were listed as heritage assets.\n"],
    [331,82,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator shows the percentage of Jersey's working age population who are available to work (either in work or actively seeking work). This figure is calculated for the Better Life Index: to fit with Better Life Index methodology, working age is defined as men and women aged 15 - 64. In 2025, a revision to the working age population levels and the numbers of employed people was made, resulting in an update of the data series. The update has not affected the trend.\nIn 2020, 78.6% of Jersey's working aged population were available for work.\n"],
    [332,82,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator shows the percentage of Jersey's working age population who are available to work (either in work or actively seeking work). This figure is calculated for the Better Life Index: to fit with Better Life Index methodology, working age is defined as men and women aged 15 - 64. In 2025, a revision to the working age population levels and the numbers of employed people was made, resulting in an update of the data series. The update has not affected the trend.\nIn 2021, 79.2% of Jersey's working aged population were available for work - slightly up on the 2020 figure of 79.1%.\n"],
    [333,82,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator shows the percentage of Jersey's working age population who are available to work (either in work or actively seeking work). This figure is calculated for the Better Life Index: to fit with Better Life Index methodology, working age is defined as men and women aged 15 - 64. In 2025, a revision to the working age population levels and the numbers of employed people was made, resulting in an update of the data series. The update has not affected the trend.\nIn 2022, 79.2% of Jersey's working aged population were available for work.\n"],
    [334,82,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator shows the percentage of Jersey's working age population who are available to work (either in work or actively seeking work). This figure is calculated for the Better Life Index: to fit with Better Life Index methodology, working age is defined as men and women aged 15 - 64. In 2025, a revision to the working age population levels and the numbers of employed people was made, resulting in an update of the data series. The update has not affected the trend.\nIn 2023, 79.5% of Jersey's working aged population were available for work.\n"],
    [335,82,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator shows the percentage of Jersey's working age population who are available to work (either in work or actively seeking work). This figure is calculated for the Better Life Index: to fit with Better Life Index methodology, working age is defined as men and women aged 15 - 64. In 2025, a revision to the working age population levels and the numbers of employed people was made, resulting in an update of the data series. The update has not affected the trend.\nIn 2024, 79.7% of Jersey's working aged population were available for work.\n"],
    [336,81,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator, derived from the Jersey Census and Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey, shows the percentage of the Jersey working population that hold a post-secondary school qualification.\n\nIn 2010, 75.3% of Jersey's workforce held such a qualification.\n"],
    [337,81,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator, derived from the Jersey Census and Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey, shows the percentage of the Jersey working population that hold a post-secondary school qualification.\n\nIn 2016, 81.1% of Jersey's workforce held such a qualification, showing a steady increase from 75.3% in 2010.\n\n"],
    [338,81,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator, derived from the Jersey Census and Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey, shows the percentage of the Jersey working population that hold a post-secondary school qualification.\n\nIn 2017, 81.0% of Jersey's workforce held such a qualification. This figure is slightly below the 2016 figure of 81.1% but still well above 2010's figure of 75.3%.\n\n"],
    [339,81,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator, derived from the Jersey Census and Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey, shows the percentage of the Jersey working population that hold a post-secondary school qualification.\n\nIn 2021, 83.5% of Jersey's workforce held such a qualification. With the exception of a slight flattening 2015 - 2017, the trend has shown a steady increase from 75.3% in 2010.\n\n"],
    [340,81,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","\nThis indicator, derived from the Jersey Census and Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey, shows the percentage of the Jersey working population that hold a post-secondary school qualification.\n\nIn 2022, 83.0% of Jersey's workforce held such a qualification, a slight drop on 2021's high point of 83.5%.\n\n"],
    [341,81,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator, derived from the Jersey Census and Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey, shows the percentage of the Jersey working population that hold a post-secondary school qualification.\n\nIn 2023, 83.7% of Jersey's workforce held such a qualification. \n"],
    [342,97,"2009-12-31T00:00:00","The business confidence score is taken from Statistics Jersey's Business Tendency Survey (BTS). The score is the difference in the percentage of respodents reporting an increase in future business activity and those reporting a decrease. Consequently a positive score is net optimistic and a negative score net pessimistic in terms of the business environment.\nPlease note that in 2025 this indicator was updated, and it is now reflecting the future business activity instead of the business optimism, due to a change in the survey's related question.\n\nIn 2009 the future business activity score was 8 percentage points.\n"],
    [343,97,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","The business confidence score is taken from Statistics Jersey's Business Tendency Survey (BTS). The score is the difference in the percentage of respodents reporting an increase in future business activity and those reporting a decrease. Consequently a positive score is net optimistic and a negative score net pessimistic in terms of the business environment.\nPlease note that in 2025 this indicator was updated, and it is now reflecting the future business activity instead of the business optimism, due to a change in the survey's related question.\n\nIn 2023 the future business activity score was 16 percentage points.\n"],
    [344,97,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","The business confidence score is taken from Statistics Jersey's Business Tendency Survey (BTS). The score is the difference in the percentage of respodents reporting an increase in future business activity and those reporting a decrease. Consequently a positive score is net optimistic and a negative score net pessimistic in terms of the business environment.\nPlease note that in 2025 this indicator was updated, and it is now reflecting the future business activity instead of the business optimism, due to a change in the survey's related question.\n\nIn 2014 the future business activity score was 18 percentage points.\n"],
    [345,97,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","The business confidence score is taken from Statistics Jersey's Business Tendency Survey (BTS). The score is the difference in the percentage of respodents reporting an increase in future business activity and those reporting a decrease. Consequently a positive score is net optimistic and a negative score net pessimistic in terms of the business environment.\nPlease note that in 2025 this indicator was updated, and it is now reflecting the future business activity instead of the business optimism, due to a change in the survey's related question.\n\nIn 2017 the future business activity score was 22 percentage points.\n"],
    [346,97,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","The business confidence score is taken from Statistics Jersey's Business Tendency Survey (BTS). The score is the difference in the percentage of respodents reporting an increase in future business activity and those reporting a decrease. Consequently a positive score is net optimistic and a negative score net pessimistic in terms of the business environment.\nPlease note that in 2025 this indicator was updated, and it is now reflecting the future business activity instead of the business optimism, due to a change in the survey's related question.\n\nIn 2019 the future business activity score was 13 percentage points.\n"],
    [347,97,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","The business confidence score is taken from Statistics Jersey's Business Tendency Survey (BTS). The score is the difference in the percentage of respodents reporting an increase in future business activity and those reporting a decrease. Consequently a positive score is net optimistic and a negative score net pessimistic in terms of the business environment.\nPlease note that in 2025 this indicator was updated, and it is now reflecting the future business activity instead of the business optimism, due to a change in the survey's related question.\n\nIn 2011 the future business activity score was -1 percentage points.\n"],
    [348,97,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","The business confidence score is taken from Statistics Jersey's Business Tendency Survey (BTS). The score is the difference in the percentage of respodents reporting an increase in future business activity and those reporting a decrease. Consequently a positive score is net optimistic and a negative score net pessimistic in terms of the business environment.\nPlease note that in 2025 this indicator was updated, and it is now reflecting the future business activity instead of the business optimism, due to a change in the survey's related question.\n\nIn 2015 the future business activity score has reached a peak level of 26 percentage points, since records began.\n"],
    [349,97,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","The business confidence score is taken from Statistics Jersey's Business Tendency Survey (BTS). The score is the difference in the percentage of respodents reporting an increase in future business activity and those reporting a decrease. Consequently a positive score is net optimistic and a negative score net pessimistic in terms of the business environment.\nPlease note that in 2025 this indicator was updated, and it is now reflecting the future business activity instead of the business optimism, due to a change in the survey's related question.\n\nIn 2024 the future business activity score continued a positive growth, reaching 19 percentage points.\n"],
    [350,97,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","The business confidence score is taken from Statistics Jersey's Business Tendency Survey (BTS). The score is the difference in the percentage of respodents reporting an increase in future business activity and those reporting a decrease. Consequently a positive score is net optimistic and a negative score net pessimistic in terms of the business environment.\nPlease note that in 2025 this indicator was updated, and it is now reflecting the future business activity instead of the business optimism, due to a change in the survey's related question.\n\nIn 2025 the future business activity score was 9 percentage points - down by over 50% comparing to the previous year.\n"],
    [351,94,"2009-12-31T00:00:00","The strategic reserve is the Government long-term reserve, set up in the mid-1980s to safeguard against a downturn in the economy.\n\nIn this series, the value of the Strategic Reserve is shown in real terms with the base year being that of the most recent datapoint. This means that the value of every data point will change with the addition of a new data point - as the value of the Strategic Reserve in each previous year is re-based to the year of the latest data point. The RPI(Y) is used to calculate real terms values.\n"],
    [352,98,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator shows the percentage of people of working age who are in work. In 2025, a revision to the working age population levels and the numbers of employed people was made, resulting in an update of the data series. The update has not affected the trend.\nIn 2020, 75% of the working aged population were actually in work.\n"],
    [353,98,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator shows the percentage of people of working age who are in work. In 2025, a revision to the working age population levels and the numbers of employed people was made, resulting in an update of the data series. The update has not affected the trend.\nIn 2021, 76.9% of the working aged population were actually in work, an increase from 75% in 2020.\n\n"],
    [354,98,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator shows the percentage of people of working age who are in work. In 2025, a revision to the working age population levels and the numbers of employed people was made, resulting in an update of the data series. The update has not affected the trend.\nIn 2022, 77.7% of the working aged population were actually in work compared to 76.9% in 2021 and 75% in 2020. \n\n"],
    [355,98,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator shows the percentage of people of working age who are in work. In 2025, a revision to the working age population levels and the numbers of employed people was made, resulting in an update of the data series. The update has not affected the trend.\nIn 2023, 78.1% of the working aged population were actually in work compared to 76.9% in 2021 and 75% in 2020. \n\n"],
    [356,98,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator shows the percentage of people of working age who are in work. In 2025, a revision to the working age population levels and the numbers of employed people was made, resulting in an update of the data series. The update has not affected the trend.\nIn 2024, 78% of the working aged population were actually in work compared to 75% in 2020. \n\n"],
    [357,96,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","This series represents the growth of Jersey's non-financial business sector. It is important for Jersey to grow its non-financial sector to have a more balanced economy, less reliant on the finance industry. For more information see Statistics Jersey's  report: Measuring Jersey's economy GDP and GVA. The data series is an index which adjusts for inflation."],
    [358,21,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator uses the total amount of pure alcohol sold in Jersey each year to calculate the volume of alcohol consumed per resident aged 15 years or older (accounting for tourists and seasonal workers) for comparison with the United Kingdom and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries. The lower numbers of visitors in 2020, due to COVID-19 pandemic, have had an impact on the below rates.\n\n\nThe indicator is measured by the average annual consumption of pure alcohol per adult (litres). 2020 saw a slight increase in annual consumption from 11.90 in 2019 to 12.10.\n\n\n"],
    [359,57,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator tracks the extent of the countryside access routes available to the public. The substantial feedback to the public consultation on the 2016 Countryside Access Strategy highlighted the value that Islanders place on such access. It encourages community engagement with the outdoors and raises levels of personal connectivity with the natural world and environmental awareness in its broadest sense. In addition, it provides for people's sporting, recreational and leisure needs.  Jersey has an extensive network of paths across public and private land in some of the Island’s most beautiful landscapes. The paths are used by an estimated 100,000 people a year, including locals and visitors and they help meet wider strategic agendas for improving physical and mental health and wellbeing while adding a significant economic value to our landscape. Access should be, safe, sustainable, and cost effective, with minimal impact on biodiversity. It should also be available to everyone. The strategy aims to improve access for all different user groups by providing multi-user paths, adding new routes, improving connectivity and resilience of the network.\n"],
    [360,1,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","Most people use Jersey’s roads every day, as drivers, passengers, cyclists and pedestrians and they should be able to do so safely.  This indicator tracks the number of collisions in which people are either killed or seriously injured (as defined by national police recording rules). This is the most reliable measure because such incidents are the most likely to be reported to the police. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n2010 saw an increase in the rate of serious road traffic collisions resulting in serious injury per 1,000 population, from 0.46 per 1,000 in 2009 to 0.64.\n\n\n"],
    [361,1,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","Most people use Jersey’s roads every day, as drivers, passengers, cyclists and pedestrians and they should be able to do so safely.  This indicator tracks the number of collisions in which people are either killed or seriously injured (as defined by national police recording rules). This is the most reliable measure because such incidents are the most likely to be reported to the police. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n2011 saw a decrease in the rate of serious road traffic collisions resulting in serious injury per 1,000 population, from 0.64 per 1,000 in 2010 to 0.40.\n\n\n"],
    [362,1,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","Most people use Jersey’s roads every day, as drivers, passengers, cyclists and pedestrians and they should be able to do so safely.  This indicator tracks the number of collisions in which people are either killed or seriously injured (as defined by national police recording rules). This is the most reliable measure because such incidents are the most likely to be reported to the police. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n2013 saw an increase in the rate of serious road traffic collisions resulting in serious injury per 1,000 population, from 0.58 per 1,000 in 2012 to 0.62.\n\n\n"],
    [363,1,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","Most people use Jersey’s roads every day, as drivers, passengers, cyclists and pedestrians and they should be able to do so safely.  This indicator tracks the number of collisions in which people are either killed or seriously injured (as defined by national police recording rules). This is the most reliable measure because such incidents are the most likely to be reported to the police. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n2014 saw a decrease in the rate of serious road traffic collisions resulting in serious injury per 1,000 population, from 0.62 per 1,000 in 2013 to 0.47.\n\n\n"],
    [364,1,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","Most people use Jersey's roads every day, as drivers, passengers, cyclists and pedestrians and they should be able to do so safely. This indicator tracks the number of collisions in which people are either killed or seriously injured (as defined by national police recording rules). This is the most reliable measure because such incidents are the most likely to be reported to the police. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time.\nResearch of incidents over the last decade showed that about 20% to 25% of serious injuries each year are deemed life-threatening or life-changing.\nWhile Jersey's roads are safer today than 20 years ago, it has proved difficult to achieve a consistent reduction in crashes resulting in serious injury over the last decade.\n2024 saw an increase in the rate of serious road traffic collisions resulting in serious injury per 1,000 population, from 0.48 per 1,000 in 2023 to 0.58 in 2024.\n\n\n"],
    [365,1,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","Most people use Jersey's roads every day, as drivers, passengers, cyclists and pedestrians and they should be able to do so safely. This indicator tracks the number of collisions in which people are either killed or seriously injured (as defined by national police recording rules). This is the most reliable measure because such incidents are the most likely to be reported to the police. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time.\nResearch of incidents over the last decade showed that about 20% to 25% of serious injuries each year are deemed life-threatening or life-changing.\nWhile Jersey's roads are safer today than 20 years ago, it has proved difficult to achieve a consistent reduction in crashes resulting in serious injury over the last decade.\n2025 saw an increase in the rate of serious road traffic collisions resulting in serious injury per 1,000 population, from 0.48 per 1,000 in 2023 to 0.65 in 2025.\n\n\n"],
    [366,2,"2009-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator combines data from the States of Jersey Fire and Rescue Service on the number of fires in Jersey with demographic data to produce a rate of fires per 1,000 population. It tracks fire safety in Jersey over time while taking into account the effects of a growing population. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n2009 saw a decrease in the number of fires per 1,000 population, from 3.10 per 1,000 in 2008 to 2.80.\n\n\n"],
    [367,2,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator combines data from the States of Jersey Fire and Rescue Service on the number of fires in Jersey with demographic data to produce a rate of fires per 1,000 population. It tracks fire safety in Jersey over time while taking into account the effects of a growing population. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n2010 saw a slight increase in the number of fires per 1,000 population, from 2.70 per 1,000 in 2009 to 2.80.\n\n\n"],
    [368,2,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator combines data from the States of Jersey Fire and Rescue Service on the number of fires in Jersey with demographic data to produce a rate of fires per 1,000 population. It tracks fire safety in Jersey over time while taking into account the effects of a growing population. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n2012 saw a decrease in the number of fires per 1,000 population, from 2.80 per 1,000 in 2010 to 2.30.\n\n\n"],
    [369,2,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator combines data from the States of Jersey Fire and Rescue Service on the number of fires in Jersey with demographic data to produce a rate of fires per 1,000 population. It tracks fire safety in Jersey over time while taking into account the effects of a growing population. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n2013 has remained relatively steady in the number of fires per 1,000 population, from 2.30 per 1,000 in 2011 to 2.40.\n\n\n"],
    [370,2,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator combines data from the States of Jersey Fire and Rescue Service on the number of fires in Jersey with demographic data to produce a rate of fires per 1,000 population. It tracks fire safety in Jersey over time while taking into account the effects of a growing population. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n2015 saw a gradual increase in the number of fires per 1,000 population, from 2.30 per 1,000 in 2012 to 2.70.\n\n\n"],
    [371,2,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator combines data from the States of Jersey Fire and Rescue Service on the number of fires in Jersey with demographic data to produce a rate of fires per 1,000 population. It tracks fire safety in Jersey over time while taking into account the effects of a growing population. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n2016 saw a considerable decrease in the number of fires per 1,000 population, from 2.70 per 1,000 in 2015 to 2.00.\n\n\n"],
    [372,2,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator combines data from the States of Jersey Fire and Rescue Service on the number of fires in Jersey with demographic data to produce a rate of fires per 1,000 population. It tracks fire safety in Jersey over time while taking into account the effects of a growing population. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n2018 saw an increase in the number of fires per 1,000 population, from 1.70 per 1,000 in 2017 to 2.40.\n\n\n"],
    [373,2,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator combines data from the States of Jersey Fire and Rescue Service on the number of fires in Jersey with demographic data to produce a rate of fires per 1,000 population. It tracks fire safety in Jersey over time while taking into account the effects of a growing population. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n\n2019 saw a decrease in the number of fires per 1,000 population, from 2.40 per 1,000 in 2018 to 1.80, nearing to the 2017 level.\n\n\n"],
    [374,2,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator combines data from the States of Jersey Fire and Rescue Service on the number of fires in Jersey with demographic data to produce a rate of fires per 1,000 population. It tracks fire safety in Jersey over time while taking into account the effects of a growing population. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n2021 saw a slight increase in the number of fires per 1,000 population, from 1.50 per 1,000 in 2020 to 1.70.\n\n\n"],
    [375,2,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator combines data from the States of Jersey Fire and Rescue Service on the number of fires in Jersey with demographic data to produce a rate of fires per 1,000 population. It tracks fire safety in Jersey over time while taking into account the effects of a growing population. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n2022 saw a steady increase in the number of fires per 1,000 population, from 1.50 per 1,000 in 2020 to 1.70.\n\n\n"],
    [376,2,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator combines data from the States of Jersey Fire and Rescue Service on the number of fires in Jersey with demographic data to produce a rate of fires per 1,000 population. It tracks fire safety in Jersey over time while taking into account the effects of a growing population. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n2024 saw a decrease in the number of fires per 1,000 population, from 1.70 per 1,000 in 2022 to 1.40.\n\n"],
    [377,2,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator combines data from the States of Jersey Fire and Rescue Service on the number of fires in Jersey with demographic data to produce a rate of fires per 1,000 population. It tracks fire safety in Jersey over time while taking into account the effects of a growing population. The indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. \n2025 saw an increase in the number of fires per 1,000 population comparing to the previous year - back to 2022 level of 1.70 per 1,000.\n\n"],
    [378,3,"2009-12-31T00:00:00","The number of crimes recorded by the police is widely used internationally to provide an overview of community safety over time. This indicator combines the number of crimes recorded by the police with demographic data to take into account changes in population. It should be noted that police recorded crime statistics can be affected by changes in policing activity and recording practice and by the willingness of victims to report. As such, they can only cover crimes that come to the attention of the police. The headline figures also hides variations both within and across crime types. As such, this indicator is a useful supplement to other indicators on community safety and should invite analysis to understand the reasons behind significant variations over time.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. 2009 saw a decrease in the number of crimes recorded by the police, from 52.20 per 1,000 in 2008 to 47.30.\n\n"],
    [379,3,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","The number of crimes recorded by the police is widely used internationally to provide an overview of community safety over time. This indicator combines the number of crimes recorded by the police with demographic data to take into account changes in population. It should be noted that police recorded crime statistics can be affected by changes in policing activity and recording practice and by the willingness of victims to report. As such, they can only cover crimes that come to the attention of the police. The headline figures also hides variations both within and across crime types. As such, this indicator is a useful supplement to other indicators on community safety and should invite analysis to understand the reasons behind significant variations over time.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. 2010 saw a continuous decrease in the number of crimes recorded by the police, from 52.20 per 1,000 in 2008 to 47.00.\n"],
    [380,3,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","The number of crimes recorded by the police is widely used internationally to provide an overview of community safety over time. This indicator combines the number of crimes recorded by the police with demographic data to take into account changes in population. It should be noted that police recorded crime statistics can be affected by changes in policing activity and recording practice and by the willingness of victims to report. As such, they can only cover crimes that come to the attention of the police. The headline figures also hides variations both within and across crime types. As such, this indicator is a useful supplement to other indicators on community safety and should invite analysis to understand the reasons behind significant variations over time.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. 2012 saw a consistent decrease in the number of crimes recorded by the police, from 47.30 per 1,000 in 2009 to 38.70.\n"],
    [381,3,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","The number of crimes recorded by the police is widely used internationally to provide an overview of community safety over time. This indicator combines the number of crimes recorded by the police with demographic data to take into account changes in population. It should be noted that police recorded crime statistics can be affected by changes in policing activity and recording practice and by the willingness of victims to report. As such, they can only cover crimes that come to the attention of the police. The headline figures also hides variations both within and across crime types. As such, this indicator is a useful supplement to other indicators on community safety and should invite analysis to understand the reasons behind significant variations over time.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. 2013 saw a substantial decrease in the number of crimes recorded by the police, from 47.00 per 1,000 in 2010 to 32.00.\n"],
    [382,4,"2007-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator counts the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance (STIA) benefit claims for full time equivalent (FTE) employees received by the Customer and Local Services department for work-related injuries or ill-health each year. It does not provide a full picture of all work-related accidents and ill-health as not all incidents result in benefit claims, but it offers an independent, reliable insight into key trends in work-related injuries and ill-health. Dividing the total number of claims by FTE employees takes into account the impact of a changing workforce size. The FTE figure is a weighted average for the calendar year produced by Statistics Jersey, which takes into account both full-time and part-time employees.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 full-time equivalent employees. 2007 saw a decrease in the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance claims, from 49.40, per 1,000 in 2006 to 42.20.\n\n\n"],
    [383,4,"2008-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator counts the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance (STIA) benefit claims for full time equivalent (FTE) employees received by the Customer and Local Services department for work-related injuries or ill-health each year. It does not provide a full picture of all work-related accidents and ill-health as not all incidents result in benefit claims, but it offers an independent, reliable insight into key trends in work-related injuries and ill-health. Dividing the total number of claims by FTE employees takes into account the impact of a changing workforce size. The FTE figure is a weighted average for the calendar year produced by Statistics Jersey, which takes into account both full-time and part-time employees.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 full-time equivalent employees. 2008 saw a slight increase in the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance claims, from 42.20, per 1,000 in 2007 to 44.00.\n\n\n"],
    [384,4,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator counts the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance (STIA) benefit claims for full time equivalent (FTE) employees received by the Customer and Local Services department for work-related injuries or ill-health each year. It does not provide a full picture of all work-related accidents and ill-health as not all incidents result in benefit claims, but it offers an independent, reliable insight into key trends in work-related injuries and ill-health. Dividing the total number of claims by FTE employees takes into account the impact of a changing workforce size. The FTE figure is a weighted average for the calendar year produced by Statistics Jersey, which takes into account both full-time and part-time employees.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 full-time equivalent employees. 2010 saw a continuous decrease in the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance claims, from 44.00, per 1,000 in 2008 to 38.40.\n\n\n"],
    [385,4,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator counts the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance (STIA) benefit claims for full time equivalent (FTE) employees received by the Customer and Local Services department for work-related injuries or ill-health each year. It does not provide a full picture of all work-related accidents and ill-health as not all incidents result in benefit claims, but it offers an independent, reliable insight into key trends in work-related injuries and ill-health. Dividing the total number of claims by FTE employees takes into account the impact of a changing workforce size. The FTE figure is a weighted average for the calendar year produced by Statistics Jersey, which takes into account both full-time and part-time employees.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 full-time equivalent employees. 2011 saw a consistent decrease in the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance claims, from 44.00, per 1,000 in 2008 to 37.30.\n\n\n"],
    [386,4,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator counts the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance (STIA) benefit claims for full time equivalent (FTE) employees received by the Customer and Local Services department for work-related injuries or ill-health each year. It does not provide a full picture of all work-related accidents and ill-health as not all incidents result in benefit claims, but it offers an independent, reliable insight into key trends in work-related injuries and ill-health. Dividing the total number of claims by FTE employees takes into account the impact of a changing workforce size. The FTE figure is a weighted average for the calendar year produced by Statistics Jersey, which takes into account both full-time and part-time employees.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 full-time equivalent employees. 2013 saw a substantial decrease in the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance claims, from 40.30, per 1,000 in 2009 to 27.50.\n\n\n"],
    [387,4,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator counts the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance (STIA) benefit claims for full time equivalent (FTE) employees received by the Customer and Local Services department for work-related injuries or ill-health each year. It does not provide a full picture of all work-related accidents and ill-health as not all incidents result in benefit claims, but it offers an independent, reliable insight into key trends in work-related injuries and ill-health. Dividing the total number of claims by FTE employees takes into account the impact of a changing workforce size. The FTE figure is a weighted average for the calendar year produced by Statistics Jersey, which takes into account both full-time and part-time employees.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 full-time equivalent employees. 2014 saw a decrease in the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance claims, from 37.30, per 1,000 in 2011 to 28.30.\n\n\n"],
    [388,4,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator counts the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance (STIA) benefit claims for full time equivalent (FTE) employees received by the Customer and Local Services department for work-related injuries or ill-health each year. It does not provide a full picture of all work-related accidents and ill-health as not all incidents result in benefit claims, but it offers an independent, reliable insight into key trends in work-related injuries and ill-health. Dividing the total number of claims by FTE employees takes into account the impact of a changing workforce size. The FTE figure is a weighted average for the calendar year produced by Statistics Jersey, which takes into account both full-time and part-time employees.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 full-time equivalent employees. 2016 saw a slight decrease in the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance claims, from 27.50, per 1,000 in 2013 to 25.20.\n\n\n"],
    [389,4,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator counts the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance (STIA) benefit claims for full time equivalent (FTE) employees received by the Customer and Local Services department for work-related injuries or ill-health each year. It does not provide a full picture of all work-related accidents and ill-health as not all incidents result in benefit claims, but it offers an independent, reliable insight into key trends in work-related injuries and ill-health. Dividing the total number of claims by FTE employees takes into account the impact of a changing workforce size. The FTE figure is a weighted average for the calendar year produced by Statistics Jersey, which takes into account both full-time and part-time employees.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 full-time equivalent employees. 2017 has remained essentially unchaged comparing to 2016, in the number of recorded STIA claims.\n"],
    [390,4,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator counts the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance (STIA) benefit claims for full time equivalent (FTE) employees received by the Customer and Local Services department for work-related injuries or ill-health each year. It does not provide a full picture of all work-related accidents and ill-health as not all incidents result in benefit claims, but it offers an independent, reliable insight into key trends in work-related injuries and ill-health. Dividing the total number of claims by FTE employees takes into account the impact of a changing workforce size. The FTE figure is a weighted average for the calendar year produced by Statistics Jersey, which takes into account both full-time and part-time employees.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 full-time equivalent employees. 2019 saw a slight increase in the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance claims, from 25.20, per 1,000 in 2016 to 26.20.\n"],
    [391,4,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator counts the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance (STIA) benefit claims for full time equivalent (FTE) employees received by the Customer and Local Services department for work-related injuries or ill-health each year. It does not provide a full picture of all work-related accidents and ill-health as not all incidents result in benefit claims, but it offers an independent, reliable insight into key trends in work-related injuries and ill-health. Dividing the total number of claims by FTE employees takes into account the impact of a changing workforce size. The FTE figure is a weighted average for the calendar year produced by Statistics Jersey, which takes into account both full-time and part-time employees.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 full-time equivalent employees. 2020 saw a decrease in the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance claims, from 26.20, per 1,000 in 2019 to 23.20.\n"],
    [392,4,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator counts the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance (STIA) benefit claims for full time equivalent (FTE) employees received by the Customer and Local Services department for work-related injuries or ill-health each year. It does not provide a full picture of all work-related accidents and ill-health as not all incidents result in benefit claims, but it offers an independent, reliable insight into key trends in work-related injuries and ill-health. Dividing the total number of claims by FTE employees takes into account the impact of a changing workforce size. The FTE figure is a weighted average for the calendar year produced by Statistics Jersey, which takes into account both full-time and part-time employees.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 full-time equivalent employees. 2022 saw a decrease in the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance claims, from 26.20, per 1,000 in 2019 to 22.50.\n"],
    [393,4,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator counts the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance (STIA) benefit claims for full time equivalent (FTE) employees received by the Customer and Local Services department for work-related injuries or ill-health each year. It does not provide a full picture of all work-related accidents and ill-health as not all incidents result in benefit claims, but it offers an independent, reliable insight into key trends in work-related injuries and ill-health. Dividing the total number of claims by FTE employees takes into account the impact of a changing workforce size. The FTE figure is a weighted average for the calendar year produced by Statistics Jersey, which takes into account both full-time and part-time employees.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 full-time equivalent employees. 2024 saw a slight increase in the number of Short-Term Incapacity Allowance claims, from 23.10, per 1,000 in 2023 to 23.70.\n"],
    [394,5,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","Community safety is not just about crime reported to, and recorded by, the police. It is also about whether people feel safe, which is why this indicator focuses on public perceptions of safety. It uses data collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which asks a representative sample of adults about the safety of their neighbourhoods in order to build a picture of community safety across the whole Island. Respondents are asked: 'How safe or unsafe do you consider your neighbourhood to be (within five minutes’ walk of your home)' and can answer: very safe; fairly safe; a bit unsafe; very unsafe; or, don't know. Overall perceptions of safety (very safe and fairly safe) are so high in Jersey that this indicator focuses on the percentage of respondents who say very safe to allow scope for improvement.\nThe percentage of islanders who say their neighbourhood is very safe has decreased from 45% in 2009 to 41%.\n"],
    [395,6,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Schools Survey, which is open to all pupils in Years 6, 8, 10 and 12. Respondents are asked if they have been bullied at or near school in the last 12 months. This indicator tracks the proportion of children in Years 6, 8 and 10 who say they have been bullied.\nThe percentage of children in Years 6, 8 and 10 who report having been bullied at or near school in the past 12 months has decreased from 27% in 2018 to 24%.\n\n\n"],
    [396,11,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","The global public health recommendation is that infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life to achieve optimal growth, development and health, before starting mixed feeding alongside ongoing breastfeeding, where possible. This indicator uses data from the 6 to 8 week development assessment by GPs, to track breastfeeding rates. Across different local authorities in England, breastfeeding rates vary between 21% and 80%. Such variation is not just down to personal choice; it is also about personal and societal circumstances. This indicator helps promote a dialogue about barriers that might prevent mothers in Jersey from breastfeeding and supports the evaluation of different interventions over time. \nThe percentage of mothers who are breastfeeding (either fully or partially) at 6 - 8 weeks has increased from 51.0% in 2011 to 53.0%.\n"],
    [397,11,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","The global public health recommendation is that infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life to achieve optimal growth, development and health, before starting mixed feeding alongside ongoing breastfeeding, where possible. This indicator uses data from the 6 to 8 week development assessment by GPs, to track breastfeeding rates. Across different local authorities in England, breastfeeding rates vary between 21% and 80%. Such variation is not just down to personal choice; it is also about personal and societal circumstances. This indicator helps promote a dialogue about barriers that might prevent mothers in Jersey from breastfeeding and supports the evaluation of different interventions over time. \nThe percentage of mothers who are breastfeeding (either fully or partially) at 6 - 8 weeks has increased from 53.0% in 2012 to 54.0%.\n"],
    [398,11,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","The global public health recommendation is that infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life to achieve optimal growth, development and health, before starting mixed feeding alongside ongoing breastfeeding, where possible. This indicator uses data from the 6 to 8 week development assessment by GPs, to track breastfeeding rates. Across different local authorities in England, breastfeeding rates vary between 21% and 80%. Such variation is not just down to personal choice; it is also about personal and societal circumstances. This indicator helps promote a dialogue about barriers that might prevent mothers in Jersey from breastfeeding and supports the evaluation of different interventions over time. \nThe percentage of mothers who are breastfeeding (either fully or partially) at 6 - 8 weeks has slightly decreased from 54.0% in 2014 to 53.0%.\n"],
    [399,11,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","The global public health recommendation is that infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life to achieve optimal growth, development and health, before starting mixed feeding alongside ongoing breastfeeding, where possible. This indicator uses data from the 6 to 8 week development assessment by GPs, to track breastfeeding rates. Across different local authorities in England, breastfeeding rates vary between 21% and 80%. Such variation is not just down to personal choice; it is also about personal and societal circumstances. This indicator helps promote a dialogue about barriers that might prevent mothers in Jersey from breastfeeding and supports the evaluation of different interventions over time. \nThe percentage of mothers who are breastfeeding (either fully or partially) at 6 - 8 weeks has increased  from 53.0% in 2015 to 57.0%.\n"],
    [400,11,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","The global public health recommendation is that infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life to achieve optimal growth, development and health, before starting mixed feeding alongside ongoing breastfeeding, where possible. This indicator uses data from the 6 to 8 week development assessment by GPs, to track breastfeeding rates. Across different local authorities in England, breastfeeding rates vary between 21% and 80%. Such variation is not just down to personal choice; it is also about personal and societal circumstances. This indicator helps promote a dialogue about barriers that might prevent mothers in Jersey from breastfeeding and supports the evaluation of different interventions over time. \nThe percentage of mothers who are breastfeeding (either fully or partially) at 6 - 8 weeks has increased considerably from 53.0% in 2015 to 60.0%.\n"],
    [401,11,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","The global public health recommendation is that infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life to achieve optimal growth, development and health, before starting mixed feeding alongside ongoing breastfeeding, where possible. This indicator uses data from the 6 to 8 week development assessment by GPs, to track breastfeeding rates. Across different local authorities in England, breastfeeding rates vary between 21% and 80%. Such variation is not just down to personal choice; it is also about personal and societal circumstances. This indicator helps promote a dialogue about barriers that might prevent mothers in Jersey from breastfeeding and supports the evaluation of different interventions over time. \nThe percentage of mothers who are breastfeeding (either fully or partially) at 6 - 8 weeks has slightly decreased from 60.0% in 2018 to 58.0%.\n"],
    [402,11,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","The global public health recommendation is that infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life to achieve optimal growth, development and health, before starting mixed feeding alongside ongoing breastfeeding, where possible. This indicator uses data from the 6 to 8 week development assessment by GPs, to track breastfeeding rates. Across different local authorities in England, breastfeeding rates vary between 21% and 80%. Such variation is not just down to personal choice; it is also about personal and societal circumstances. This indicator helps promote a dialogue about barriers that might prevent mothers in Jersey from breastfeeding and supports the evaluation of different interventions over time. \nThe percentage of mothers who are breastfeeding (either fully or partially) at 6 - 8 weeks has remained unchanged since 2020 (62.0%).\n"],
    [403,11,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","The global public health recommendation is that infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life to achieve optimal growth, development and health, before starting mixed feeding alongside ongoing breastfeeding, where possible. This indicator uses data from the 6 to 8 week development assessment by GPs, to track breastfeeding rates. Across different local authorities in England, breastfeeding rates vary between 21% and 80%. Such variation is not just down to personal choice; it is also about personal and societal circumstances. This indicator helps promote a dialogue about barriers that might prevent mothers in Jersey from breastfeeding and supports the evaluation of different interventions over time. \nThe percentage of mothers who are breastfeeding (either fully or partially) at 6 - 8 weeks has increased  to 65.0%, being the highest recorded level since 2011.\n"],
    [404,11,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","The global public health recommendation is that infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life to achieve optimal growth, development and health, before starting mixed feeding alongside ongoing breastfeeding, where possible. This indicator uses data from the 6 to 8 week development assessment by GPs, to track breastfeeding rates. Across different local authorities in England, breastfeeding rates vary between 21% and 80%. Such variation is not just down to personal choice; it is also about personal and societal circumstances. This indicator helps promote a dialogue about barriers that might prevent mothers in Jersey from breastfeeding and supports the evaluation of different interventions over time. \nThe percentage of mothers who are breastfeeding (either fully or partially) at 6 - 8 weeks has increased  to 67.0%, being the highest recorded level since 2011.\n"],
    [405,11,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","The global public health recommendation is that infants should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life to achieve optimal growth, development and health, before starting mixed feeding alongside ongoing breastfeeding, where possible. This indicator uses data from the 6 to 8 week development assessment by GPs, to track breastfeeding rates. Across different local authorities in England, breastfeeding rates vary between 21% and 80%. Such variation is not just down to personal choice; it is also about personal and societal circumstances. This indicator helps promote a dialogue about barriers that might prevent mothers in Jersey from breastfeeding and supports the evaluation of different interventions over time. \nThe percentage of mothers who are breastfeeding (either fully or partially) at 6 - 8 weeks has increased  to 71.0%, being the highest recorded level since 2011.\n"],
    [406,21,"2007-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator uses the total amount of pure alcohol sold in Jersey each year to calculate the volume of alcohol consumed per resident aged 15 years or older (accounting for tourists and seasonal workers) for comparison with the United Kingdom and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries. \nThe indicator is measured by the average annual consumption of pure alcohol per adult (litres). 2007 saw a slight reduction in annual consumption from 14.50 in 2006 to 14.00.\n"],
    [407,21,"2008-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator uses the total amount of pure alcohol sold in Jersey each year to calculate the volume of alcohol consumed per resident aged 15 years or older (accounting for tourists and seasonal workers) for comparison with the United Kingdom and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries. \nThe indicator is measured by the average annual consumption of pure alcohol per adult (litres). 2008 saw a reduction in annual consumption from 14.50 in 2006 to 13.50.\n"],
    [408,21,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator uses the total amount of pure alcohol sold in Jersey each year to calculate the volume of alcohol consumed per resident aged 15 years or older (accounting for tourists and seasonal workers) for comparison with the United Kingdom and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries. \nThe indicator is measured by the average annual consumption of pure alcohol per adult (litres). 2010 has remained essentially unchanged in annual consumption comparing to the previous year.\n"],
    [409,21,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator uses the total amount of pure alcohol sold in Jersey each year to calculate the volume of alcohol consumed per resident aged 15 years or older (accounting for tourists and seasonal workers) for comparison with the United Kingdom and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries. \nThe indicator is measured by the average annual consumption of pure alcohol per adult (litres). 2011 saw a reduction in annual consumption from 13.50 in 2008 to 12.20.\n"],
    [410,21,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator uses the total amount of pure alcohol sold in Jersey each year to calculate the volume of alcohol consumed per resident aged 15 years or older (accounting for tourists and seasonal workers) for comparison with the United Kingdom and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries. \nThe indicator is measured by the average annual consumption of pure alcohol per adult (litres). 2013 saw a notable reduction in annual consumption from 13.30 in 2010 to 11.70.\n"],
    [411,21,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator uses the total amount of pure alcohol sold in Jersey each year to calculate the volume of alcohol consumed per resident aged 15 years or older (accounting for tourists and seasonal workers) for comparison with the United Kingdom and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries. \nThe indicator is measured by the average annual consumption of pure alcohol per adult (litres). 2014 has remained essentially unchanged in annual consumption comparing to previous year.\n"],
    [412,21,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator uses the total amount of pure alcohol sold in Jersey each year to calculate the volume of alcohol consumed per resident aged 15 years or older (accounting for tourists and seasonal workers) for comparison with the United Kingdom and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries. \nThe indicator is measured by the average annual consumption of pure alcohol per adult (litres). 2016 saw a slight increase in annual consumption from 13.30 in 2015 to 12.00.\n"],
    [413,21,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator uses the total amount of pure alcohol sold in Jersey each year to calculate the volume of alcohol consumed per resident aged 15 years or older (accounting for tourists and seasonal workers) for comparison with the United Kingdom and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries. \nThe indicator is measured by the average annual consumption of pure alcohol per adult (litres). 2017 was at the same annual consumption level as in 2013 - 11.70\n"],
    [414,21,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator uses the total amount of pure alcohol sold in Jersey each year to calculate the volume of alcohol consumed per resident aged 15 years or older (accounting for tourists and seasonal workers) for comparison with the United Kingdom and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries. \nThe indicator is measured by the average annual consumption of pure alcohol per adult (litres). 2019 has remained essentially unchanged in annual consumption since 2016.\n"],
    [415,21,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator uses the total amount of pure alcohol sold in Jersey each year to calculate the volume of alcohol consumed per resident aged 15 years or older (accounting for tourists and seasonal workers) for comparison with the United Kingdom and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries. \nThe indicator is measured by the average annual consumption of pure alcohol per adult (litres). 2022 saw a decrease in annual consumption from 12.30 in 2021 to 11.60.\n"],
    [416,22,"2007-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how often they smoke cigarettes and are given a range of options from never to daily. This indicator monitors the proportion of adults who currently smoke, either daily or occasionally (not including e-cigarettes).\nThe percentage of islanders who smoke daily or occasionally has decreased from 25.0% in 2005 to 20.0%.\n"],
    [417,22,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how often they smoke cigarettes and are given a range of options from never to daily. This indicator monitors the proportion of adults who currently smoke, either daily or occasionally (not including e-cigarettes).\nThe percentage of islanders who smoke daily or occasionally has increased from 20.0% in 2007 to 23.0%.\n"],
    [418,22,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how often they smoke cigarettes and are given a range of options from never to daily. This indicator monitors the proportion of adults who currently smoke, either daily or occasionally (not including e-cigarettes).\nThe percentage of islanders who smoke daily or occasionally has slightly decreased from 23.0% in 2010 to 22.0%.\n"],
    [419,22,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how often they smoke cigarettes and are given a range of options from never to daily. This indicator monitors the proportion of adults who currently smoke, either daily or occasionally (not including e-cigarettes).\nThe percentage of islanders who smoke daily or occasionally has decreased from 22.0% in 2012 to 19.0%.\n"],
    [420,22,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how often they smoke cigarettes and are given a range of options from never to daily. This indicator monitors the proportion of adults who currently smoke, either daily or occasionally (not including e-cigarettes).\nThe percentage of islanders who smoke daily or occasionally was at a simmilar level as in 2014 - 19.0%.\n"],
    [421,22,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how often they smoke cigarettes and are given a range of options from never to daily. This indicator monitors the proportion of adults who currently smoke, either daily or occasionally (not including e-cigarettes).\nThe percentage of islanders who smoke daily or occasionally has decreased considerably, from 19.0% in 2014 to 16.0%.\n"],
    [422,22,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how often they smoke cigarettes and are given a range of options from never to daily. This indicator monitors the proportion of adults who currently smoke, either daily or occasionally (not including e-cigarettes).\nThe percentage of islanders who smoke daily or occasionally has decreased considerably, from 19.0% in 2016 to 15.0%.\n"],
    [423,22,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how often they smoke cigarettes and are given a range of options from never to daily. This indicator monitors the proportion of adults who currently smoke, either daily or occasionally (not including e-cigarettes).\nThe percentage of islanders who smoke daily or occasionally has increased from 16.0% in 2017 to 18.0%.\n"],
    [424,22,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how often they smoke cigarettes and are given a range of options from never to daily. This indicator monitors the proportion of adults who currently smoke, either daily or occasionally (not including e-cigarettes).\nThe percentage of islanders who smoke daily or occasionally has returned to a similar level as in 2018 - 15.0%.\n"],
    [425,23,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","Healthy life expectancy (HLE) is an extension of life expectancy, that combines mortality data with general health status data, to produce estimates of the span of life that a person can expect to live in 'very good' or 'good' health. HLE at birth is the number of years a newborn child could expect to live in 'good' or 'very good' health. It is calculated using the previous 3 years' worth of data for each data point.\n"],
    [426,23,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","Healthy life expectancy (HLE) is an extension of life expectancy, that combines mortality data with general health status data, to produce estimates of the span of life that a person can expect to live in 'very good' or 'good' health. HLE at birth is the number of years a newborn child could expect to live in 'good' or 'very good' health. It is calculated using the previous 3 years' worth of data for each data point.\nIn 2018 the HLE at birth rate saw a slight decrease from 68.10 in 2017 to 67.80.\n"],
    [427,23,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","Healthy life expectancy (HLE) is an extension of life expectancy, that combines mortality data with general health status data, to produce estimates of the span of life that a person can expect to live in 'very good' or 'good' health. HLE at birth is the number of years a newborn child could expect to live in 'good' or 'very good' health. It is calculated using the previous 3 years' worth of data for each data point.\nIn 2019 the HLE at birth rate saw a decrease from 68.10 in 2017 to 65.90.\n"],
    [428,23,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","Healthy life expectancy (HLE) is an extension of life expectancy, that combines mortality data with general health status data, to produce estimates of the span of life that a person can expect to live in 'very good' or 'good' health. HLE at birth is the number of years a newborn child could expect to live in 'good' or 'very good' health. It is calculated using the previous 3 years' worth of data for each data point.\nIn 2020 the HLE at birth rate has continued to decrease from 68.10 in 2017 to 63.50.\n"],
    [429,23,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","Healthy life expectancy (HLE) is an extension of life expectancy, that combines mortality data with general health status data, to produce estimates of the span of life that a person can expect to live in 'very good' or 'good' health. HLE at birth is the number of years a newborn child could expect to live in 'good' or 'very good' health. It is calculated using the previous 3 years' worth of data for each data point.\nIn 2021 the HLE at birth rate dropped to its lower levels since 2017, down to 62.00.\n"],
    [430,24,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","Expected years in poor health at age 65 is a combination of two measures: Life Expectancy at 65 years and Healthy Life Expectancy at 65 years. By subtracting the HLE at 65 years from the LE at 65 years we can estimate the number of years a 65 year old can averagely expect to spend in poor health. Ideally, through good healthcare and public health awareness we would seek to increase the overall Life Expectancy of the population while also increasing the Healthy life Expectancy thus minimising years spent in poor health.\n"],
    [431,24,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","Expected years in poor health at age 65 is a combination of two measures: Life Expectancy at 65 years and Healthy Life Expectancy at 65 years. By subtracting the HLE at 65 years from the LE at 65 years we can estimate the number of years a 65 year old can averagely expect to spend in poor health. Ideally, through good healthcare and public health awareness we would seek to increase the overall Life Expectancy of the population while also increasing the Healthy life Expectancy thus minimising years spent in poor health.\nIn 2019 there was a slight increase in the expected years in poor health after 65 years, from 7.40 in 2018 to 7.80.\n"],
    [432,24,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","Expected years in poor health at age 65 is a combination of two measures: Life Expectancy at 65 years and Healthy Life Expectancy at 65 years. By subtracting the HLE at 65 years from the LE at 65 years we can estimate the number of years a 65 year old can averagely expect to spend in poor health. Ideally, through good healthcare and public health awareness we would seek to increase the overall Life Expectancy of the population while also increasing the Healthy life Expectancy thus minimising years spent in poor health.\nIn 2020 the number of expected years in poor health after 65 years has continued increasing, from 7.40 in 2018 to 9.20.\n"],
    [433,24,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","Expected years in poor health at age 65 is a combination of two measures: Life Expectancy at 65 years and Healthy Life Expectancy at 65 years. By subtracting the HLE at 65 years from the LE at 65 years we can estimate the number of years a 65 year old can averagely expect to spend in poor health. Ideally, through good healthcare and public health awareness we would seek to increase the overall Life Expectancy of the population while also increasing the Healthy life Expectancy thus minimising years spent in poor health.\nIn 2021 the number of expected years in poor health after 65 years has reached its peak since 2018 - up to 9.90 mark.\n"],
    [434,24,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","\nExpected years in poor health at age 65 is a combination of two measures: Life Expectancy at 65 years and Healthy Life Expectancy at 65 years. By subtracting the HLE at 65 years from the LE at 65 years we can estimate the number of years a 65 year old can averagely expect to spend in poor health. Ideally, through good healthcare and public health awareness we would seek to increase the overall Life Expectancy of the population while also increasing the Healthy life Expectancy thus minimising years spent in poor health.\n\n\n\nOver the period 2018 to 2021, the expected years in poor health increased from 7.4 to 9.9 before dropping back to 9.0 in 2023.\n"],
    [435,24,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","\nExpected years in poor health at age 65 is a combination of two measures: Life Expectancy at 65 years and Healthy Life Expectancy at 65 years. By subtracting the HLE at 65 years from the LE at 65 years we can estimate the number of years a 65 year old can averagely expect to spend in poor health. Ideally, through good healthcare and public health awareness we would seek to increase the overall Life Expectancy of the population while also increasing the Healthy life Expectancy thus minimising years spent in poor health.\n\n\n\nOver the period 2018 to 2021, the expected years in poor health increased from 7.4 to 9.9 before dropping back to 8.1 in 2024.\n"],
    [436,23,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","Healthy life expectancy (HLE) is an extension of life expectancy, that combines mortality data with self-reported general health status data, to produce estimates of the span of life that a person can expect to live in 'very good' or 'good' health. HLE at birth is the number of years a newborn child could expect to live in 'good' or 'very good' health. It is calculated using the previous 3 years' worth of data for each data point.\nHLE at birth reduced from 68.1 years in 2017 to a low of 62.0 years in 2021 before increasing slightly, being 63.3 years in 2023. The reduction in HLE over 2020 and 2021 was driven by a reduction in the self-reported general health status data, which coincides with the height of the Covid pandemic.\n"],
    [437,23,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","Healthy life expectancy (HLE) is an extension of life expectancy, that combines mortality data with self-reported general health status data, to produce estimates of the span of life that a person can expect to live in 'very good' or 'good' health. HLE at birth is the number of years a newborn child could expect to live in 'good' or 'very good' health. It is calculated using the previous 3 years' worth of data for each data point.\nHLE at birth reduced from 68.1 years in 2017 to a low of 62.0 years in 2021 before increasing slightly, being 64.4 years in 2024. The reduction in HLE over 2020 and 2021 was driven by a reduction in the self-reported general health status data, which coincides with the height of the Covid pandemic.\n"],
    [438,25,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scales are used nationally and internationally to measure mental wellbeing at population level and evaluate programmes and policies which aim to improve mental wellbeing. Local data is gathered by regularly using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey to ask a representative sample of adults a standard set of questions from the 'short Warwick-Edinburgh scale'. The responses inform a population-level result on a scale between 7 and 35 with higher scores indicate higher positive mental well-being.\nIn 2023 the average mental well-being score on the short Warwick-Edinburgh scale (7 to 35) has decreased for the first time since 2012 records, from 26.00 to 25.00.\n"],
    [439,25,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scales are used nationally and internationally to measure mental wellbeing at population level and evaluate programmes and policies which aim to improve mental wellbeing. Local data is gathered by regularly using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey to ask a representative sample of adults a standard set of questions from the 'short Warwick-Edinburgh scale'. The responses inform a population-level result on a scale between 7 and 35 with higher scores indicate higher positive mental well-being.\nIn 2025 the average mental well-being score on the short Warwick-Edinburgh scale (7 to 35) has remained unchanged since 2023 - 25.00.\n"],
    [440,26,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","In many countries, including the UK, Germany, France and the USA, people are recommended to eat five or more portions of fruit and vegetables each day. Data on local consumption is gathered through the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults. Respondents are asked 'how many portions of fruit or vegetables did you eat yesterday'. Responses are categorised into: 0 portions; 1-4 portions; and, 5+ portions (equal to or above the NHS recommended level).\nThe percentage of islanders who eat the recommended level of fruit and vegetables increased from 34.0% in 2010 to 37.0%.\n"],
    [441,28,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","Multi-morbidity is commonly defined as the presence of two or more chronic medical conditions in a patient. These are conditions that currently have no cure, and may be managed with drugs and other treatment. As populations age, the level of multi-morbidity is likely to increase, which will have implications for health and social care provision. GPs record patients with 12 long-term conditions as part of the Jersey Quality Improvement Framework (JQIF). These conditions are a good basis for multi-morbidity analysis and they are agreed amongst clinicians as being important. They are: atrial fibrillation; asthma; coronary heart disease; chronic kidney disease; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; dementia; diabetes; heart failure; hypertension; mental health problems; obesity; stroke and transient ischemic attack. There are now 12 long-term conditions reported (we no longer include Cancer as not part of JQIF).\n"],
    [442,28,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","Multi-morbidity is commonly defined as the presence of two or more chronic medical conditions in a patient. These are conditions that currently have no cure, and may be managed with drugs and other treatment. As populations age, the level of multi-morbidity is likely to increase, which will have implications for health and social care provision. GPs record patients with 12 long-term conditions as part of the Jersey Quality Improvement Framework (JQIF). These conditions are a good basis for multi-morbidity analysis and they are agreed amongst clinicians as being important. They are: atrial fibrillation; asthma; coronary heart disease; chronic kidney disease; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; dementia; diabetes; heart failure; hypertension; mental health problems; obesity; stroke and transient ischemic attack. There are now 12 long-term conditions reported (we no longer include Cancer as part of JQIF).\nIn 2017 the percentage of population with 2 or more conditions increased from 11.0% in 2016 to 12.0%.\n"],
    [443,28,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","Multi-morbidity is commonly defined as the presence of two or more chronic medical conditions in a patient. These are conditions that currently have no cure, and may be managed with drugs and other treatment. As populations age, the level of multi-morbidity is likely to increase, which will have implications for health and social care provision. GPs record patients with 12 long-term conditions as part of the Jersey Quality Improvement Framework (JQIF). These conditions are a good basis for multi-morbidity analysis and they are agreed amongst clinicians as being important. They are: atrial fibrillation; asthma; coronary heart disease; chronic kidney disease; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; dementia; diabetes; heart failure; hypertension; mental health problems; obesity; stroke and transient ischemic attack. There are now 12 long-term conditions reported (we no longer include Cancer as part of JQIF).\nIn 2018 the percentage of population with 2 or more conditions has remained unchanged comparing to previous year.\n"],
    [444,28,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","Multi-morbidity is commonly defined as the presence of two or more chronic medical conditions in a patient. These are conditions that currently have no cure, and may be managed with drugs and other treatment. As populations age, the level of multi-morbidity is likely to increase, which will have implications for health and social care provision. GPs record patients with 12 long-term conditions as part of the Jersey Quality Improvement Framework (JQIF). These conditions are a good basis for multi-morbidity analysis and they are agreed amongst clinicians as being important. They are: atrial fibrillation; asthma; coronary heart disease; chronic kidney disease; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; dementia; diabetes; heart failure; hypertension; mental health problems; obesity; stroke and transient ischemic attack. There are now 12 long-term conditions reported (we no longer include Cancer as part of JQIF).\nIn 2019 the percentage of population with 2 or more conditions has remained unchanged comparing to previous year.\n"],
    [445,28,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","Multi-morbidity is commonly defined as the presence of two or more chronic medical conditions in a patient. These are conditions that currently have no cure, and may be managed with drugs and other treatment. As populations age, the level of multi-morbidity is likely to increase, which will have implications for health and social care provision. GPs record patients with 12 long-term conditions as part of the Jersey Quality Improvement Framework (JQIF). These conditions are a good basis for multi-morbidity analysis and they are agreed amongst clinicians as being important. They are: atrial fibrillation; asthma; coronary heart disease; chronic kidney disease; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; dementia; diabetes; heart failure; hypertension; mental health problems; obesity; stroke and transient ischemic attack. There are now 12 long-term conditions reported (we no longer include Cancer as part of JQIF).\nThere has been no changes in the percentage of population with 2 or more conditions since 2017.\n"],
    [446,29,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","High coverage of immunisations plays a vital role in safeguarding both the wellbeing of individuals and the community at large. By ensuring a broad reach of vaccinations, high coverage effectively restricts the transmission of diseases among those who have not received immunisations, be it due to personal preference or medical circumstances.   \nJersey currently offers residents 19 vaccinations: some in childhood; others during their teenage years and some in old age. Each vaccination has a target take up rate. This indicator measures the percentage of the 19 vaccinations to have hit their take-up targets each year.\nIn 2015, the percentage take up of vaccinations decreased considerably from 73.0% in 2014 to 53.0%.\n"],
    [447,29,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","High coverage of immunisations plays a vital role in safeguarding both the wellbeing of individuals and the community at large. By ensuring a broad reach of vaccinations, high coverage effectively restricts the transmission of diseases among those who have not received immunisations, be it due to personal preference or medical circumstances.   \nJersey currently offers residents 19 vaccinations: some in childhood; others during their teenage years and some in old age. Each vaccination has a target take up rate. This indicator measures the percentage of the 19 vaccinations to have hit their take-up targets each year.\nIn 2017, the percentage take up of vaccinations increased from 53.0% in 2016 to 67.0%.\n"],
    [448,29,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","High coverage of immunisations plays a vital role in safeguarding both the wellbeing of individuals and the community at large. By ensuring a broad reach of vaccinations, high coverage effectively restricts the transmission of diseases among those who have not received immunisations, be it due to personal preference or medical circumstances.   \nJersey currently offers residents 19 vaccinations: some in childhood; others during their teenage years and some in old age. Each vaccination has a target take up rate. This indicator measures the percentage of the 19 vaccinations to have hit their take-up targets each year.\nIn 2019, the percentage take up of vaccinations decreased to a similar level as in 2017 - down to 68.0%.\n"],
    [449,29,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","High coverage of immunisations plays a vital role in safeguarding both the wellbeing of individuals and the community at large. By ensuring a broad reach of vaccinations, high coverage effectively restricts the transmission of diseases among those who have not received immunisations, be it due to personal preference or medical circumstances.   \nJersey currently offers residents 19 vaccinations: some in childhood; others during their teenage years and some in old age. Each vaccination has a target take up rate. This indicator measures the percentage of the 19 vaccinations to have hit their take-up targets each year.\nIn 2021, the percentage take up of vaccinations increased from 68.0% in 2019 to 79.0%.\n"],
    [450,29,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","High coverage of immunisations plays a vital role in safeguarding both the wellbeing of individuals and the community at large. By ensuring a broad reach of vaccinations, high coverage effectively restricts the transmission of diseases among those who have not received immunisations, be it due to personal preference or medical circumstances.   \nJersey currently offers residents 19 vaccinations: some in childhood; others during their teenage years and some in old age. Each vaccination has a target take up rate. This indicator measures the percentage of the 19 vaccinations to have hit their take-up targets each year.\nIn 2023, the percentage take up of vaccinations increased from 47.0% in 2022 to 63.0%, after a continuous decrease during the previous two years.\n"],
    [451,30,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","Avoidable mortality is an indicator based on the concept that premature deaths from certain conditions should be rare and ideally should not occur in the presence of appropriate public health interventions (preventable deaths) or timely and effective healthcare (treatable deaths). For further information see Jersey Mortality Statistics. The figure presented is the age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR) per 100,000 population which accounts for changes to the age and sex of the population.\n"],
    [452,30,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","Avoidable mortality is an indicator based on the concept that premature deaths from certain conditions should be rare and ideally should not occur in the presence of appropriate public health interventions (preventable deaths) or timely and effective healthcare (treatable deaths). For further information see Jersey Mortality Statistics. The figure presented is the age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR) per 100,000 population which accounts for changes to the age and sex of the population.\nThe ASMR rate for Jersey has increased slightly from 211.50 in 2012 to 215.10 avoidable deaths per 100,000 population."],
    [453,30,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","Avoidable mortality is an indicator based on the concept that premature deaths from certain conditions should be rare and ideally should not occur in the presence of appropriate public health interventions (preventable deaths) or timely and effective healthcare (treatable deaths). For further information see Jersey Mortality Statistics. The figure presented is the age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR) per 100,000 population which accounts for changes to the age and sex of the population.\nThe ASMR rate for Jersey has decreased from 215.10 in 2013 to 200.20 avoidable deaths per 100,000 population."],
    [454,30,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","Avoidable mortality is an indicator based on the concept that premature deaths from certain conditions should be rare and ideally should not occur in the presence of appropriate public health interventions (preventable deaths) or timely and effective healthcare (treatable deaths). For further information see Jersey Mortality Statistics. The figure presented is the age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR) per 100,000 population which accounts for changes to the age and sex of the population.\nThe ASMR rate for Jersey has decreased from 211.50 in 2012 to 204.80 avoidable deaths per 100,000 population."],
    [455,30,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","Avoidable mortality is an indicator based on the concept that premature deaths from certain conditions should be rare and ideally should not occur in the presence of appropriate public health interventions (preventable deaths) or timely and effective healthcare (treatable deaths). For further information see Jersey Mortality Statistics. The figure presented is the age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR) per 100,000 population which accounts for changes to the age and sex of the population.\nThe ASMR rate for Jersey has decreased from 215.10 in 2013 to 197.60 avoidable deaths per 100,000 population."],
    [456,30,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","Avoidable mortality is an indicator based on the concept that premature deaths from certain conditions should be rare and ideally should not occur in the presence of appropriate public health interventions (preventable deaths) or timely and effective healthcare (treatable deaths). For further information see Jersey Mortality Statistics. The figure presented is the age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR) per 100,000 population which accounts for changes to the age and sex of the population.\nThe ASMR rate for Jersey has remained at a similar level as 2014 with no significant changes during the 3 years period.\n"],
    [457,30,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","Avoidable mortality is an indicator based on the concept that premature deaths from certain conditions should be rare and ideally should not occur in the presence of appropriate public health interventions (preventable deaths) or timely and effective healthcare (treatable deaths). For further information see Jersey Mortality Statistics. The figure presented is the age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR) per 100,000 population which accounts for changes to the age and sex of the population.\nThe ASMR rate for Jersey has continued to gradually decrease since 2015, reaching 192.40 avoidable deaths per 100,000 population in 2018.\n"],
    [458,30,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","Avoidable mortality is an indicator based on the concept that premature deaths from certain conditions should be rare and ideally should not occur in the presence of appropriate public health interventions (preventable deaths) or timely and effective healthcare (treatable deaths). For further information see Jersey Mortality Statistics. The figure presented is the age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR) per 100,000 population which accounts for changes to the age and sex of the population.\nThe ASMR rate for Jersey saw a decrease from 197.60 in 2016 to 188.00 avoidable deaths per 100,000 population.\n"],
    [459,30,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","Avoidable mortality is an indicator based on the concept that premature deaths from certain conditions should be rare and ideally should not occur in the presence of appropriate public health interventions (preventable deaths) or timely and effective healthcare (treatable deaths). For further information see Jersey Mortality Statistics. The figure presented is the age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR) per 100,000 population which accounts for changes to the age and sex of the population.\nThe ASMR rate for Jersey was at its lowest level since 2012 records - down to 163.30 avoidable deaths per 100,000 population.\n"],
    [460,30,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","Avoidable mortality is an indicator based on the concept that premature deaths from certain conditions should be rare and ideally should not occur in the presence of appropriate public health interventions (preventable deaths) or timely and effective healthcare (treatable deaths). For further information see Jersey Mortality Statistics. The figure presented is the age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR) per 100,000 population which accounts for changes to the age and sex of the population.\nThe ASMR rate for Jersey has increased to similar to 2019 level - up to 189.50 avoidable deaths per 100,000 population."],
    [461,30,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","Avoidable mortality is an indicator based on the concept that premature deaths from certain conditions should be rare and ideally should not occur in the presence of appropriate public health interventions (preventable deaths) or timely and effective healthcare (treatable deaths). For further information see Jersey Mortality Statistics. The figure presented is the age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR) per 100,000 population which accounts for changes to the age and sex of the population.\n\nThe ASMR rate for Jersey has reduced steadily since 2012 - however due to wide confidence intervals this is not seen as statisically significant (see latest Jersey Mortality Statistics). The latest figure is 152 avoidable deaths per 100,000 population (ASMR)."],
    [462,30,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","Avoidable mortality is an indicator based on the concept that premature deaths from certain conditions should be rare and ideally should not occur in the presence of appropriate public health interventions (preventable deaths) or timely and effective healthcare (treatable deaths). For further information see Jersey Mortality Statistics. The figure presented is the age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR) per 100,000 population which accounts for changes to the age and sex of the population.\n\nThe ASMR rate for Jersey has reduced steadily since 2012 - however due to wide confidence intervals this is not seen as statisically significant (see latest Jersey Mortality Statistics). The latest figure is 155 avoidable deaths per 100,000 population (ASMR)."],
    [463,39,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Participants are asked 'How do you rate the range of the following leisure activities available in Jersey' and can rate social and recreational activities (bars, restaurants, social clubs, etc) as very good, good, poor or very poor.  \nIn 2019, the percentage of islanders who rate the range of social and recreational activities in Jersey as good or very good decreased from 91.0% in 2017 to 89.0%.\n"],
    [464,42,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked: 'As a place to live, how satisfied are you with your local neighbourhood (within five minutes’ walk of your home)' They can choose from very satisfied; fairly satisfied; not very satisfied; or, not at all satisfied.\nIn 2013, 93% of adults reported being very or fairly satisfied with their neighbourhood, with 50% being very satisfied. This indicator deliberately focuses on tracking change in the very satisfied responses over time.\n\n\n"],
    [465,42,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked: 'As a place to live, how satisfied are you with your local neighbourhood (within five minutes’ walk of your home)' They can choose from very satisfied; fairly satisfied; not very satisfied; or, not at all satisfied.\nIn 2014, 93% of adults reported being very or fairly satisfied with their neighbourhood, with 62% being very satisfied. This indicator deliberately focuses on tracking change in the very satisfied responses over time.\n"],
    [466,42,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked: 'As a place to live, how satisfied are you with your local neighbourhood (within five minutes’ walk of your home)' They can choose from very satisfied; fairly satisfied; not very satisfied; or, not at all satisfied.\nIn 2017, 95% of adults reported being very or fairly satisfied with their neighbourhood, with 57% being very satisfied. This indicator deliberately focuses on tracking change in the very satisfied responses over time.\n"],
    [467,42,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked: 'As a place to live, how satisfied are you with your local neighbourhood (within five minutes’ walk of your home)' They can choose from very satisfied; fairly satisfied; not very satisfied; or, not at all satisfied.\nIn 2018, 96% of adults reported being very or fairly satisfied with their neighbourhood, with 60% being very satisfied. This indicator deliberately focuses on tracking change in the very satisfied responses over time.\n"],
    [468,43,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator tracks traffic flow on the nine main routes into St Helier during the morning peak period for a typical winter morning, as recorded by automatic traffic counters. Since 2016 new monitoring equipment has been used in order to record the traffic flow more reliably.\nIn 2017, morning peak traffic on nine main routes into St Helier slightly decreased from 10,798 vehicles in 2016 to 10,742.\n"],
    [469,43,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator tracks traffic flow on the nine main routes into St Helier during the morning peak period for a typical winter morning, as recorded by automatic traffic counters. Since 2016 new monitoring equipment has been used in order to record the traffic flow more reliably.\nIn 2019, morning peak traffic on nine main routes into St Helier decreased from 10,798 vehicles in 2016 to 10,537.\n"],
    [470,43,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator tracks traffic flow on the nine main routes into St Helier during the morning peak period for a typical winter morning, as recorded by automatic traffic counters. Since 2016 new monitoring equipment has been used in order to record the traffic flow more reliably.\nIn 2021, morning peak traffic on nine main routes into St Helier decreased considerably from 10,537 vehicles in 2019 to 9,116.\n"],
    [471,43,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator tracks traffic flow on the nine main routes into St Helier during the morning peak period for a typical winter morning, as recorded by automatic traffic counters. Since 2016 new monitoring equipment has been used in order to record the traffic flow more reliably.\nIn 2023, morning peak traffic on nine main routes into St Helier increased from 9,116 vehicles in 2021 to 10,361.\n"],
    [472,44,"2007-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which is sent to a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked about their usual mode of transport to work.  Walking, cycling and bus travel are all included as active modes of travel; the latter because research has shown that taking the bus involves more walking that taking the car. Increasing the proportion of islanders who actively travel to work would help to ease per hour traffic congestion, and have a positive impact on air quality, energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Active travel has also been shown to benefit people’s physical and mental health, and would contribute towards improving St Helier as a place to live. It also supports affordable living by enabling households to make significant savings on transport costs. \nIn 2007, the percentage of journeys to work usually made by walking, cycling or public transport increased notably from 29.0% in 2006 to 41.0%.\n"],
    [473,44,"2008-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which is sent to a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked about their usual mode of transport to work.  Walking, cycling and bus travel are all included as active modes of travel; the latter because research has shown that taking the bus involves more walking that taking the car. Increasing the proportion of islanders who actively travel to work would help to ease per hour traffic congestion, and have a positive impact on air quality, energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Active travel has also been shown to benefit people’s physical and mental health, and would contribute towards improving St Helier as a place to live. It also supports affordable living by enabling households to make significant savings on transport costs. \nIn 2008, the percentage of journeys to work usually made by walking, cycling or public transport increased from 29.0% in 2006 to 35.0%.\n"],
    [474,44,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which is sent to a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked about their usual mode of transport to work.  Walking, cycling and bus travel are all included as active modes of travel; the latter because research has shown that taking the bus involves more walking that taking the car. Increasing the proportion of islanders who actively travel to work would help to ease per hour traffic congestion, and have a positive impact on air quality, energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Active travel has also been shown to benefit people’s physical and mental health, and would contribute towards improving St Helier as a place to live. It also supports affordable living by enabling households to make significant savings on transport costs. \nIn 2010, the percentage of journeys to work usually made by walking, cycling or public transport increased from 35.0% in 2008 to 39.0%.\n"],
    [475,44,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which is sent to a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked about their usual mode of transport to work.  Walking, cycling and bus travel are all included as active modes of travel; the latter because research has shown that taking the bus involves more walking that taking the car. Increasing the proportion of islanders who actively travel to work would help to ease per hour traffic congestion, and have a positive impact on air quality, energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Active travel has also been shown to benefit people’s physical and mental health, and would contribute towards improving St Helier as a place to live. It also supports affordable living by enabling households to make significant savings on transport costs. \nIn 2011, the percentage of journeys to work usually made by walking, cycling or public transport was at a similar level as in 2008, following a decrease since 2010 by 3%, from 39.0% to 36.0%.\n"],
    [476,44,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which is sent to a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked about their usual mode of transport to work.  Walking, cycling and bus travel are all included as active modes of travel; the latter because research has shown that taking the bus involves more walking that taking the car. Increasing the proportion of islanders who actively travel to work would help to ease per hour traffic congestion, and have a positive impact on air quality, energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Active travel has also been shown to benefit people’s physical and mental health, and would contribute towards improving St Helier as a place to live. It also supports affordable living by enabling households to make significant savings on transport costs. \nIn 2014, the percentage of journeys to work usually made by walking, cycling or public transport increased from 36.0% in 2011 to 41.0%.\n"],
    [477,44,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which is sent to a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked about their usual mode of transport to work.  Walking, cycling and bus travel are all included as active modes of travel; the latter because research has shown that taking the bus involves more walking that taking the car. Increasing the proportion of islanders who actively travel to work would help to ease per hour traffic congestion, and have a positive impact on air quality, energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Active travel has also been shown to benefit people’s physical and mental health, and would contribute towards improving St Helier as a place to live. It also supports affordable living by enabling households to make significant savings on transport costs. \nIn 2015, the percentage of journeys to work usually made by walking, cycling or public transport has been steadily increasing from 36.0% in 2011 to 40.0%.\n"],
    [478,44,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which is sent to a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked about their usual mode of transport to work.  Walking, cycling and bus travel are all included as active modes of travel; the latter because research has shown that taking the bus involves more walking that taking the car. Increasing the proportion of islanders who actively travel to work would help to ease per hour traffic congestion, and have a positive impact on air quality, energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Active travel has also been shown to benefit people’s physical and mental health, and would contribute towards improving St Helier as a place to live. It also supports affordable living by enabling households to make significant savings on transport costs. \nIn 2018, the percentage of journeys to work usually made by walking, cycling or public transport increased from 40.0% in 2015 to 43.0%.\n"],
    [479,44,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which is sent to a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked about their usual mode of transport to work.  Walking, cycling and bus travel are all included as active modes of travel; the latter because research has shown that taking the bus involves more walking that taking the car. Increasing the proportion of islanders who actively travel to work would help to ease per hour traffic congestion, and have a positive impact on air quality, energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Active travel has also been shown to benefit people’s physical and mental health, and would contribute towards improving St Helier as a place to live. It also supports affordable living by enabling households to make significant savings on transport costs. \nIn 2022, the percentage of journeys to work usually made by walking, cycling or public transport increased slightly from 41.0% in 2019 to 42.0%.\n"],
    [480,45,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator shows the number of structures which are listed listed as heritage assets and afforded protection. The number of heritage assets should be maintained and added to; protecting Jersey's history for future generations.\n2021 has remained unchanged comparing to the previous year."],
    [481,45,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator shows the number of structures which are listed listed as heritage assets and afforded protection. The number of heritage assets should be maintained and added to; protecting Jersey's history for future generations.\n2025 has remained essentially unchanged comparing to the previous year."],
    [482,51,"2005-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly. \nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall.\n\n\nIn 2005, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 16 species of butterfly) increased from 100.00 in 2004 to 110.27.\n\n"],
    [483,51,"2006-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly. \nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall.\n\n\nIn 2006, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 16 species of butterfly) increased significantly from 100.00 in 2004 to 148.74.\n\n"],
    [484,51,"2008-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly. \nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall.\n\n\nIn 2008, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 16 species of butterfly) decreased from 110.27 in 2005 to 94.76.\n\n\n"],
    [485,51,"2009-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly. \nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall.\n\n\nIn 2009, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 16 species of butterfly) increased from 98.74 in 2007 to 140.56.\n\n"],
    [486,51,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly. \nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall.\n\n\nIn 2011, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 16 species of butterfly) decreased from 140.56 in 2009 to 115.87.\n\n"],
    [487,51,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly. \nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall.\n\n\nIn 2012, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 16 species of butterfly) has remained essentially unchanged since 2011.\n"],
    [488,51,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly. \nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall.\n\n\nIn 2014, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 16 species of butterfly) increased from 115.87 in 2011 to 160.52.\n\n"],
    [489,51,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly. \nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall.\n\n\nIn 2015, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 16 species of butterfly) increased from 115.24 in 2012 to 145.08.\n\n"],
    [490,51,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly. \nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall.\n\n\nIn 2017, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 16 species of butterfly) increased from 145.08 in 2015 to 157.58.\n\n"],
    [491,51,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly. \nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall.\n\n\nIn 2018, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 16 species of butterfly) decreased from 152.15 in 2016 to 130.04.\n\n"],
    [492,51,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly. \nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall.\n\n\nIn 2020, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 16 species of butterfly) decreased from 130.04 in 2018 to 114.4.\n\n"],
    [493,51,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly. \nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall.\n\n\nIn 2021, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 16 species of butterfly) has increased from 145.79 in 2019, to 162.64.\n\n"],
    [494,52,"2000-12-31T00:00:00","Bird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself. \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\n\n\nIn 2000, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) decreased from 32.50 in 1999 to 27.20.\n"],
    [495,52,"2001-12-31T00:00:00","Bird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself. \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\n\n\nIn 2001, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) decreased from 32.50 in 1999 to 27.20.\n"],
    [496,52,"2003-12-31T00:00:00","Bird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself. \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\n\n\nIn 2003, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) decreased from 32.50 in 1999 to 27.00.\n"],
    [497,52,"2004-12-31T00:00:00","Bird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself. \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\n\n\nIn 2004, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) decreased from 27.20 in 2001 to 24.10.\n"],
    [498,52,"2006-12-31T00:00:00","Bird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself. \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\n\n\nIn 2006, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) has remained at a similar level as in 2004.\n"],
    [499,52,"2007-12-31T00:00:00","Bird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself. \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\n\n\nIn 2007, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) has remained at a similar level as in 2005.\n"],
    [500,52,"2009-12-31T00:00:00","Bird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself. \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\n\n\nIn 2009, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) decreased from 26.00 in 2007 to 21.00.\n"],
    [501,52,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","Bird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself. \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\n\n\nIn 2010, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) decreased from 26.00 in 2007 to 19.20.\n"],
    [502,52,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","Bird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself. \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\n\n\nIn 2012, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) increased from 21.00 in 2009 to 22.80.\n"],
    [503,52,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","Bird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself. \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\n\n\nIn 2013, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) has remained at a similar level as in 2010.\n"],
    [504,52,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","Bird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself. \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\n\n\nIn 2015, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) increased from 18.60 in 2013 to 26.90.\n"],
    [505,52,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","Bird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself. \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\n\n\nIn 2016, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) has remained at a similar level as in 2014.\n"],
    [506,52,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","Bird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself. \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\n\n\nIn 2018, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) increased from 19.80 in 2016 to 23.30.\n"],
    [507,52,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","Bird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself. \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\n\n\nIn 2019, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) increased from 19.40 in 2017 to 23.00.\n"],
    [508,52,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","Bird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself. \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\n\n\nIn 2022, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) has remained essentially unchanged in the past two years.\n"],
    [509,52,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","Bird populations are widely recognised to be a good environmental indicator because they occupy a wide range of habitats and tend to be near the top of the food chain. The distribution, abundance and changes over time in wild populations are equally important in telling us about the state of the environment, as animal communities are good indicators of the condition of the habitat itself. \nThis indicator is calculated from the findings of the British Trust for Ornithology's annual Breeding Bird Survey and counts the number of 44 different species of birds per hectare across farmland and suburban habitats. Scientific monitoring by the Breeding Birds Survey shows bird populations in Jersey’s farmland and suburban habitats have been in rapid decline since 1996. This is also happening in the UK and Europe. However, the decline is not inevitable. Like butterflies, some bird species in Jersey's semi-natural habitats are increasing; demonstrating that habitat conservation management is successful in halting the decline of species.\n\n\nIn 2023, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 44 species of bird per hectare across different habitat types) increased from 20.90 in 2020 to 23.40.\n"],
    [510,53,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","Despite its small size, Jersey contains an incredibly diverse range of natural habitats. The Island's geographical position, and favourable climate, has resulted in a mixture of British and European animals and plants, some of which can only be found in the Channel Islands. Jersey has made international commitments to conserve its species, habitats and ecosystems, for which the designation of Sites of Special Interest (SSI) is a vital component. Protecting the Island's natural environment also contributes significantly to Islanders' overall quality of life. Engaging with nature, for example, can benefit mental and physical wellbeing.\nThis indicator covers the extent in hectares of protected areas above the mean high water level (where geological and ecological sites coincide, the land area is only counted once). The first ecological SSIs were designated in 1996 to satisfy the requirements of international conventions. To-date, 28 Sites of Special Ecological Interest and 22 Sites of Special Geological Interest have been designated. The total area covered, 548 hectares, equates to about 5% of Jersey's land area, and includes key habitats such as wetlands, woodland, hedgerows, maritime heath, coastal sand dunes and grassland. Only about 20% of Jersey’s key semi-natural habitats are protected by SSI designation, so a large area of critical natural habitat remains unprotected.\n"],
    [511,53,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","Despite its small size, Jersey contains an incredibly diverse range of natural habitats. The Island's geographical position, and favourable climate, has resulted in a mixture of British and European animals and plants, some of which can only be found in the Channel Islands. Jersey has made international commitments to conserve its species, habitats and ecosystems, for which the designation of Sites of Special Interest (SSI) is a vital component. Protecting the Island's natural environment also contributes significantly to Islanders' overall quality of life. Engaging with nature, for example, can benefit mental and physical wellbeing.\nThis indicator covers the extent in hectares of protected areas above the mean high water level (where geological and ecological sites coincide, the land area is only counted once). The first ecological SSIs were designated in 1996 to satisfy the requirements of international conventions. To-date, 28 Sites of Special Ecological Interest and 22 Sites of Special Geological Interest have been designated. The total area covered, 548 hectares, equates to about 5% of Jersey's land area, and includes key habitats such as wetlands, woodland, hedgerows, maritime heath, coastal sand dunes and grassland. Only about 20% of Jersey’s key semi-natural habitats are protected by SSI designation, so a large area of critical natural habitat remains unprotected.\nIn 2011, the area of Jersey’s land which is designated as SSI increased from 515.31 in 2009 to 518.32.\n"],
    [512,53,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","Despite its small size, Jersey contains an incredibly diverse range of natural habitats. The Island's geographical position, and favourable climate, has resulted in a mixture of British and European animals and plants, some of which can only be found in the Channel Islands. Jersey has made international commitments to conserve its species, habitats and ecosystems, for which the designation of Sites of Special Interest (SSI) is a vital component. Protecting the Island's natural environment also contributes significantly to Islanders' overall quality of life. Engaging with nature, for example, can benefit mental and physical wellbeing.\nThis indicator covers the extent in hectares of protected areas above the mean high water level (where geological and ecological sites coincide, the land area is only counted once). The first ecological SSIs were designated in 1996 to satisfy the requirements of international conventions. To-date, 28 Sites of Special Ecological Interest and 22 Sites of Special Geological Interest have been designated. The total area covered, 548 hectares, equates to about 5% of Jersey's land area, and includes key habitats such as wetlands, woodland, hedgerows, maritime heath, coastal sand dunes and grassland. Only about 20% of Jersey’s key semi-natural habitats are protected by SSI designation, so a large area of critical natural habitat remains unprotected.\nIn 2013, the area of Jersey’s land which is designated as SSI has remained essentially unchanged in the past two years.\n"],
    [513,53,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","Despite its small size, Jersey contains an incredibly diverse range of natural habitats. The Island's geographical position, and favourable climate, has resulted in a mixture of British and European animals and plants, some of which can only be found in the Channel Islands. Jersey has made international commitments to conserve its species, habitats and ecosystems, for which the designation of Sites of Special Interest (SSI) is a vital component. Protecting the Island's natural environment also contributes significantly to Islanders' overall quality of life. Engaging with nature, for example, can benefit mental and physical wellbeing.\nThis indicator covers the extent in hectares of protected areas above the mean high water level (where geological and ecological sites coincide, the land area is only counted once). The first ecological SSIs were designated in 1996 to satisfy the requirements of international conventions. To-date, 28 Sites of Special Ecological Interest and 22 Sites of Special Geological Interest have been designated. The total area covered, 548 hectares, equates to about 5% of Jersey's land area, and includes key habitats such as wetlands, woodland, hedgerows, maritime heath, coastal sand dunes and grassland. Only about 20% of Jersey’s key semi-natural habitats are protected by SSI designation, so a large area of critical natural habitat remains unprotected.\nIn 2014, the area of Jersey’s land which is designated as SSI increased slightly from 518.32 in 2011 to 520.27.\n"],
    [514,53,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","Despite its small size, Jersey contains an incredibly diverse range of natural habitats. The Island's geographical position, and favourable climate, has resulted in a mixture of British and European animals and plants, some of which can only be found in the Channel Islands. Jersey has made international commitments to conserve its species, habitats and ecosystems, for which the designation of Sites of Special Interest (SSI) is a vital component. Protecting the Island's natural environment also contributes significantly to Islanders' overall quality of life. Engaging with nature, for example, can benefit mental and physical wellbeing.\nThis indicator covers the extent in hectares of protected areas above the mean high water level (where geological and ecological sites coincide, the land area is only counted once). The first ecological SSIs were designated in 1996 to satisfy the requirements of international conventions. To-date, 28 Sites of Special Ecological Interest and 22 Sites of Special Geological Interest have been designated. The total area covered, 548 hectares, equates to about 5% of Jersey's land area, and includes key habitats such as wetlands, woodland, hedgerows, maritime heath, coastal sand dunes and grassland. Only about 20% of Jersey’s key semi-natural habitats are protected by SSI designation, so a large area of critical natural habitat remains unprotected.\nIn 2016, the area of Jersey’s land which is designated as SSI increased from 518.32 in 2013 to 523.83.\n"],
    [515,53,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","Despite its small size, Jersey contains an incredibly diverse range of natural habitats. The Island's geographical position, and favourable climate, has resulted in a mixture of British and European animals and plants, some of which can only be found in the Channel Islands. Jersey has made international commitments to conserve its species, habitats and ecosystems, for which the designation of Sites of Special Interest (SSI) is a vital component. Protecting the Island's natural environment also contributes significantly to Islanders' overall quality of life. Engaging with nature, for example, can benefit mental and physical wellbeing.\nThis indicator covers the extent in hectares of protected areas above the mean high water level (where geological and ecological sites coincide, the land area is only counted once). The first ecological SSIs were designated in 1996 to satisfy the requirements of international conventions. To-date, 28 Sites of Special Ecological Interest and 22 Sites of Special Geological Interest have been designated. The total area covered, 548 hectares, equates to about 5% of Jersey's land area, and includes key habitats such as wetlands, woodland, hedgerows, maritime heath, coastal sand dunes and grassland. Only about 20% of Jersey’s key semi-natural habitats are protected by SSI designation, so a large area of critical natural habitat remains unprotected.\nIn 2017, the area of Jersey’s land which is designated as SSI has remained unchanged in the last two years.\n"],
    [516,53,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","Despite its small size, Jersey contains an incredibly diverse range of natural habitats. The Island's geographical position, and favourable climate, has resulted in a mixture of British and European animals and plants, some of which can only be found in the Channel Islands. Jersey has made international commitments to conserve its species, habitats and ecosystems, for which the designation of Sites of Special Interest (SSI) is a vital component. Protecting the Island's natural environment also contributes significantly to Islanders' overall quality of life. Engaging with nature, for example, can benefit mental and physical wellbeing.\nThis indicator covers the extent in hectares of protected areas above the mean high water level (where geological and ecological sites coincide, the land area is only counted once). The first ecological SSIs were designated in 1996 to satisfy the requirements of international conventions. To-date, 28 Sites of Special Ecological Interest and 22 Sites of Special Geological Interest have been designated. The total area covered, 548 hectares, equates to about 5% of Jersey's land area, and includes key habitats such as wetlands, woodland, hedgerows, maritime heath, coastal sand dunes and grassland. Only about 20% of Jersey’s key semi-natural habitats are protected by SSI designation, so a large area of critical natural habitat remains unprotected.\nIn 2019, the area of Jersey’s land which is designated as SSI increased from 523.83 in 2016 to 531.24.\n"],
    [517,53,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","Despite its small size, Jersey contains an incredibly diverse range of natural habitats. The Island's geographical position, and favourable climate, has resulted in a mixture of British and European animals and plants, some of which can only be found in the Channel Islands. Jersey has made international commitments to conserve its species, habitats and ecosystems, for which the designation of Sites of Special Interest (SSI) is a vital component. Protecting the Island's natural environment also contributes significantly to Islanders' overall quality of life. Engaging with nature, for example, can benefit mental and physical wellbeing.\nThis indicator covers the extent in hectares of protected areas above the mean high water level (where geological and ecological sites coincide, the land area is only counted once). The first ecological SSIs were designated in 1996 to satisfy the requirements of international conventions. To-date, 28 Sites of Special Ecological Interest and 22 Sites of Special Geological Interest have been designated. The total area covered, 548 hectares, equates to about 5% of Jersey's land area, and includes key habitats such as wetlands, woodland, hedgerows, maritime heath, coastal sand dunes and grassland. Only about 20% of Jersey’s key semi-natural habitats are protected by SSI designation, so a large area of critical natural habitat remains unprotected.\nIn 2020, the area of Jersey’s land which is designated as SSI increased from 523.83 in 2017 to 548.44.\n"],
    [518,53,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","Despite its small size, Jersey contains an incredibly diverse range of natural habitats. The Island's geographical position, and favourable climate, has resulted in a mixture of British and European animals and plants, some of which can only be found in the Channel Islands. Jersey has made international commitments to conserve its species, habitats and ecosystems, for which the designation of Sites of Special Interest (SSI) is a vital component. Protecting the Island's natural environment also contributes significantly to Islanders' overall quality of life. Engaging with nature, for example, can benefit mental and physical wellbeing.\nThis indicator covers the extent in hectares of protected areas above the mean high water level (where geological and ecological sites coincide, the land area is only counted once). The first ecological SSIs were designated in 1996 to satisfy the requirements of international conventions. To-date, 28 Sites of Special Ecological Interest and 22 Sites of Special Geological Interest have been designated. The total area covered, 548 hectares, equates to about 5% of Jersey's land area, and includes key habitats such as wetlands, woodland, hedgerows, maritime heath, coastal sand dunes and grassland. Only about 20% of Jersey’s key semi-natural habitats are protected by SSI designation, so a large area of critical natural habitat remains unprotected.\nIn 2022, the area of Jersey’s land which is designated as SSI has remained unchanged in the last two years.\n"],
    [519,53,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","\nDespite its small size, Jersey contains an incredibly diverse range of natural habitats. The Island's geographical position, and favourable climate, has resulted in a mixture of British and European animals and plants, some of which can only be found in the Channel Islands. Jersey has made international commitments to conserve its species, habitats and ecosystems, for which the designation of Sites of Special Interest (SSI) is a vital component. Protecting the Island's natural environment also contributes significantly to Islanders' overall quality of life. Engaging with nature, for example, can benefit mental and physical wellbeing.\nThis indicator covers the extent in hectares of protected areas above the mean high water level (where geological and ecological sites coincide, the land area is only counted once). The first ecological SSIs were designated in 1996 to satisfy the requirements of international conventions. To-date, 28 Sites of Special Ecological Interest and 22 Sites of Special Geological Interest have been designated. The total area covered, 548 hectares, equates to about 5% of Jersey's land area, and includes key habitats such as wetlands, woodland, hedgerows, maritime heath, coastal sand dunes and grassland. Only about 20% of Jersey’s key semi-natural habitats are protected by SSI designation, so a large area of critical natural habitat remains unprotected.\nIn 2023, the area of Jersey’s land which is designated as SSI has remained essentially unchanged in the last two years.\n\n\n\n\n\n"],
    [520,54,"2009-12-31T00:00:00","Many seas, oceans and coastal regions suffer from the adverse effect of human activity and in response some governments have established Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to help restore and conserve fragile ecosystems. Jersey’s coastal waters are home to several internationally important habitats, the most notable of which are seagrass meadows, kelp forests and maerl, all of which play a role in local biodiversity and maintaining the health of our marine environment.\nThe protection of these habitats from potential threats has led to the establishment of a network of MPAs around Jersey and on the offshore reefs at Les Écréhous and Les Minquiers. These MPAs prohibit activities that most threaten the marine species and habitats, including the use of mobile fishing gear such as dredges and trawls. Creating and registering an MPA is a complex process that requires detailed evidence gathering, careful analysis, local and international consultation and law drafting. For this reason, it takes time for MPAs to be established, but once in place the benefits to marine life and general marine environment will often extend far beyond the boundaries of the protected area.\n"],
    [521,54,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","Many seas, oceans and coastal regions suffer from the adverse effect of human activity and in response some governments have established Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to help restore and conserve fragile ecosystems. Jersey’s coastal waters are home to several internationally important habitats, the most notable of which are seagrass meadows, kelp forests and maerl, all of which play a role in local biodiversity and maintaining the health of our marine environment.\nThe protection of these habitats from potential threats has led to the establishment of a network of MPAs around Jersey and on the offshore reefs at Les Écréhous and Les Minquiers. These MPAs prohibit activities that most threaten the marine species and habitats, including the use of mobile fishing gear such as dredges and trawls. Creating and registering an MPA is a complex process that requires detailed evidence gathering, careful analysis, local and international consultation and law drafting. For this reason, it takes time for MPAs to be established, but once in place the benefits to marine life and general marine environment will often extend far beyond the boundaries of the protected area. \nIn 2010, the area covered by Marine Protected Areas in Jersey's territorial waters increased from 31.00 in 2008 to 78.00.\n"],
    [522,54,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","Many seas, oceans and coastal regions suffer from the adverse effect of human activity and in response some governments have established Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to help restore and conserve fragile ecosystems. Jersey’s coastal waters are home to several internationally important habitats, the most notable of which are seagrass meadows, kelp forests and maerl, all of which play a role in local biodiversity and maintaining the health of our marine environment.\nThe protection of these habitats from potential threats has led to the establishment of a network of MPAs around Jersey and on the offshore reefs at Les Écréhous and Les Minquiers. These MPAs prohibit activities that most threaten the marine species and habitats, including the use of mobile fishing gear such as dredges and trawls. Creating and registering an MPA is a complex process that requires detailed evidence gathering, careful analysis, local and international consultation and law drafting. For this reason, it takes time for MPAs to be established, but once in place the benefits to marine life and general marine environment will often extend far beyond the boundaries of the protected area. \nIn 2012, the area covered by Marine Protected Areas in Jersey's territorial waters has remained unchanged in the last two years.\n"],
    [523,54,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","Many seas, oceans and coastal regions suffer from the adverse effect of human activity and in response some governments have established Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to help restore and conserve fragile ecosystems. Jersey’s coastal waters are home to several internationally important habitats, the most notable of which are seagrass meadows, kelp forests and maerl, all of which play a role in local biodiversity and maintaining the health of our marine environment.\nThe protection of these habitats from potential threats has led to the establishment of a network of MPAs around Jersey and on the offshore reefs at Les Écréhous and Les Minquiers. These MPAs prohibit activities that most threaten the marine species and habitats, including the use of mobile fishing gear such as dredges and trawls. Creating and registering an MPA is a complex process that requires detailed evidence gathering, careful analysis, local and international consultation and law drafting. For this reason, it takes time for MPAs to be established, but once in place the benefits to marine life and general marine environment will often extend far beyond the boundaries of the protected area. \nIn 2013, the area covered by Marine Protected Areas in Jersey's territorial waters has remained unchanged in the last three years.\n"],
    [524,5,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","Many seas, oceans and coastal regions suffer from the adverse effect of human activity and in response some governments have established Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to help restore and conserve fragile ecosystems. Jersey’s coastal waters are home to several internationally important habitats, the most notable of which are seagrass meadows, kelp forests and maerl, all of which play a role in local biodiversity and maintaining the health of our marine environment.\nThe protection of these habitats from potential threats has led to the establishment of a network of MPAs around Jersey and on the offshore reefs at Les Écréhous and Les Minquiers. These MPAs prohibit activities that most threaten the marine species and habitats, including the use of mobile fishing gear such as dredges and trawls. Creating and registering an MPA is a complex process that requires detailed evidence gathering, careful analysis, local and international consultation and law drafting. For this reason, it takes time for MPAs to be established, but once in place the benefits to marine life and general marine environment will often extend far beyond the boundaries of the protected area. \nIn 2015, the area covered by Marine Protected Areas in Jersey's territorial waters increased from 78.00 in 2013 to 88.00.\n"],
    [525,54,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","Many seas, oceans and coastal regions suffer from the adverse effect of human activity and in response some governments have established Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to help restore and conserve fragile ecosystems. Jersey’s coastal waters are home to several internationally important habitats, the most notable of which are seagrass meadows, kelp forests and maerl, all of which play a role in local biodiversity and maintaining the health of our marine environment.\nThe protection of these habitats from potential threats has led to the establishment of a network of MPAs around Jersey and on the offshore reefs at Les Écréhous and Les Minquiers. These MPAs prohibit activities that most threaten the marine species and habitats, including the use of mobile fishing gear such as dredges and trawls. Creating and registering an MPA is a complex process that requires detailed evidence gathering, careful analysis, local and international consultation and law drafting. For this reason, it takes time for MPAs to be established, but once in place the benefits to marine life and general marine environment will often extend far beyond the boundaries of the protected area. \nIn 2016, the area covered by Marine Protected Areas in Jersey's territorial waters has remained unchanged in the last two years.\n"],
    [526,54,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","Many seas, oceans and coastal regions suffer from the adverse effect of human activity and in response some governments have established Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to help restore and conserve fragile ecosystems. Jersey’s coastal waters are home to several internationally important habitats, the most notable of which are seagrass meadows, kelp forests and maerl, all of which play a role in local biodiversity and maintaining the health of our marine environment.\nThe protection of these habitats from potential threats has led to the establishment of a network of MPAs around Jersey and on the offshore reefs at Les Écréhous and Les Minquiers. These MPAs prohibit activities that most threaten the marine species and habitats, including the use of mobile fishing gear such as dredges and trawls. Creating and registering an MPA is a complex process that requires detailed evidence gathering, careful analysis, local and international consultation and law drafting. For this reason, it takes time for MPAs to be established, but once in place the benefits to marine life and general marine environment will often extend far beyond the boundaries of the protected area. \nIn 2018, the area covered by Marine Protected Areas in Jersey's territorial waters increased considerably from 88.00 in 2016 to 151.00.\n"],
    [527,54,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","Many seas, oceans and coastal regions suffer from the adverse effect of human activity and in response some governments have established Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to help restore and conserve fragile ecosystems. Jersey’s coastal waters are home to several internationally important habitats, the most notable of which are seagrass meadows, kelp forests and maerl, all of which play a role in local biodiversity and maintaining the health of our marine environment.\nThe protection of these habitats from potential threats has led to the establishment of a network of MPAs around Jersey and on the offshore reefs at Les Écréhous and Les Minquiers. These MPAs prohibit activities that most threaten the marine species and habitats, including the use of mobile fishing gear such as dredges and trawls. Creating and registering an MPA is a complex process that requires detailed evidence gathering, careful analysis, local and international consultation and law drafting. For this reason, it takes time for MPAs to be established, but once in place the benefits to marine life and general marine environment will often extend far beyond the boundaries of the protected area. \nIn 2019, the area covered by Marine Protected Areas in Jersey's territorial waters has remained unchanged in the last two years.\n"],
    [528,54,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","Many seas, oceans and coastal regions suffer from the adverse effect of human activity and in response some governments have established Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to help restore and conserve fragile ecosystems. Jersey’s coastal waters are home to several internationally important habitats, the most notable of which are seagrass meadows, kelp forests and maerl, all of which play a role in local biodiversity and maintaining the health of our marine environment.\nThe protection of these habitats from potential threats has led to the establishment of a network of MPAs around Jersey and on the offshore reefs at Les Écréhous and Les Minquiers. These MPAs prohibit activities that most threaten the marine species and habitats, including the use of mobile fishing gear such as dredges and trawls. Creating and registering an MPA is a complex process that requires detailed evidence gathering, careful analysis, local and international consultation and law drafting. For this reason, it takes time for MPAs to be established, but once in place the benefits to marine life and general marine environment will often extend far beyond the boundaries of the protected area. \nIn 2021, the area covered by Marine Protected Areas in Jersey's territorial waters has remained unchanged since 2017.\n"],
    [529,54,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","Many seas, oceans and coastal regions suffer from the adverse effect of human activity and in response some governments have established Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to help restore and conserve fragile ecosystems. Jersey’s coastal waters are home to several internationally important habitats, the most notable of which are seagrass meadows, kelp forests and maerl, all of which play a role in local biodiversity and maintaining the health of our marine environment.\nThe protection of these habitats from potential threats has led to the establishment of a network of MPAs around Jersey and on the offshore reefs at Les Écréhous and Les Minquiers. These MPAs prohibit activities that most threaten the marine species and habitats, including the use of mobile fishing gear such as dredges and trawls. Creating and registering an MPA is a complex process that requires detailed evidence gathering, careful analysis, local and international consultation and law drafting. For this reason, it takes time for MPAs to be established, but once in place the benefits to marine life and general marine environment will often extend far beyond the boundaries of the protected area. \nIn 2023, the area covered by Marine Protected Areas in Jersey's territorial waters increased slightly from 151.00 in 2020 to 153.00.\n"],
    [530,54,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","Many seas, oceans and coastal regions suffer from the adverse effect of human activity and in response some governments have established Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to help restore and conserve fragile ecosystems. Jersey’s coastal waters are home to several internationally important habitats, the most notable of which are seagrass meadows, kelp forests and maerl, all of which play a role in local biodiversity and maintaining the health of our marine environment.\nThe protection of these habitats from potential threats has led to the establishment of a network of MPAs around Jersey and on the offshore reefs at Les Écréhous and Les Minquiers. These MPAs prohibit activities that most threaten the marine species and habitats, including the use of mobile fishing gear such as dredges and trawls. Creating and registering an MPA is a complex process that requires detailed evidence gathering, careful analysis, local and international consultation and law drafting. For this reason, it takes time for MPAs to be established, but once in place the benefits to marine life and general marine environment will often extend far beyond the boundaries of the protected area. \nIn 2024, the area covered by Marine Protected Areas in Jersey's territorial waters remained unchanged since previous years.\n"],
    [531,54,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","Many seas, oceans and coastal regions suffer from the adverse effect of human activity and in response some governments have established Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to help restore and conserve fragile ecosystems. Jersey’s coastal waters are home to several internationally important habitats, the most notable of which are seagrass meadows, kelp forests and maerl, all of which play a role in local biodiversity and maintaining the health of our marine environment.\nThe protection of these habitats from potential threats has led to the establishment of a network of MPAs around Jersey and on the offshore reefs at Les Écréhous and Les Minquiers. These MPAs prohibit activities that most threaten the marine species and habitats, including the use of mobile fishing gear such as dredges and trawls. Creating and registering an MPA is a complex process that requires detailed evidence gathering, careful analysis, local and international consultation and law drafting. For this reason, it takes time for MPAs to be established, but once in place the benefits to marine life and general marine environment will often extend far beyond the boundaries of the protected area. \nIn 2025, the area covered by Marine Protected Areas in Jersey's territorial waters remained unchanged since 2022.\n"],
    [532,55,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator is developed from a model that combines aerial mapping of the Island with data from the planning process. The term green space combines two formal land use categories: land under cultivation; and, natural environment. The latter includes woodlands, dunes, grassland, cliffs and shrub. This indicator divides the total amount of green space by Jersey's total land mass, excluding inland water (e.g. ponds, streams and reservoirs) and inter-tidal areas.   \nIn 2013, 71.3% of the island consisted of land under cultivation or natural habitat. This figure does not include man-made green space such as private gardens, public parks, sports fields, and golf courses, which account for another 14% of Jersey's land mass.\n"],
    [533,55,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator is developed from a model that combines aerial mapping of the Island with data from the planning process. The term green space combines two formal land use categories: land under cultivation; and, natural environment. The latter includes woodlands, dunes, grassland, cliffs and shrub. This indicator divides the total amount of green space by Jersey's total land mass, excluding inland water (e.g. ponds, streams and reservoirs) and inter-tidal areas.   \nIn 2014, 71.4% of the island consisted of land under cultivation or natural habitat. This figure does not include man-made green space such as private gardens, public parks, sports fields, and golf courses, which account for another 14% of Jersey's land mass.\n"],
    [534,55,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator is developed from a model that combines aerial mapping of the Island with data from the planning process. The term green space combines two formal land use categories: land under cultivation; and, natural environment. The latter includes woodlands, dunes, grassland, cliffs and shrub. This indicator divides the total amount of green space by Jersey's total land mass, excluding inland water (e.g. ponds, streams and reservoirs) and inter-tidal areas.   \nIn 2016, 70.9% of the island consisted of land under cultivation or natural habitat. This figure does not include man-made green space such as private gardens, public parks, sports fields, and golf courses, which account for another 14% of Jersey's land mass.\n"],
    [535,55,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator is developed from a model that combines aerial mapping of the Island with data from the planning process. The term green space combines two formal land use categories: land under cultivation; and, natural environment. The latter includes woodlands, dunes, grassland, cliffs and shrub. This indicator divides the total amount of green space by Jersey's total land mass, excluding inland water (e.g. ponds, streams and reservoirs) and inter-tidal areas.   \nIn 2017, 71.0% of the island consisted of land under cultivation or natural habitat. This figure does not include man-made green space such as private gardens, public parks, sports fields, and golf courses, which account for another 14% of Jersey's land mass.\n"],
    [536,55,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator is developed from a model that combines aerial mapping of the Island with data from the planning process. The term green space combines two formal land use categories: land under cultivation; and, natural environment. The latter includes woodlands, dunes, grassland, cliffs and shrub. This indicator divides the total amount of green space by Jersey's total land mass, excluding inland water (e.g. ponds, streams and reservoirs) and inter-tidal areas.   \nIn 2019, 70.7% of the island consisted of land under cultivation or natural habitat. This figure does not include man-made green space such as private gardens, public parks, sports fields, and golf courses, which account for another 14% of Jersey's land mass.\n"],
    [537,55,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator is developed from a model that combines aerial mapping of the Island with data from the planning process. The term green space combines two formal land use categories: land under cultivation; and, natural environment. The latter includes woodlands, dunes, grassland, cliffs and shrub. This indicator divides the total amount of green space by Jersey's total land mass, excluding inland water (e.g. ponds, streams and reservoirs) and inter-tidal areas.   \nIn 2020, 70.7% of the island consisted of land under cultivation or natural habitat. This figure does not include man-made green space such as private gardens, public parks, sports fields, and golf courses, which account for another 14% of Jersey's land mass.\n"],
    [538,55,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator is developed from a model that combines aerial mapping of the Island with data from the planning process. The term green space combines two formal land use categories: land under cultivation; and, natural environment. The latter includes woodlands, dunes, grassland, cliffs and shrub. This indicator divides the total amount of green space by Jersey's total land mass, excluding inland water (e.g. ponds, streams and reservoirs) and inter-tidal areas.   \nIn 2023, 70.6% of the island consisted of land under cultivation or natural habitat. This figure does not include man-made green space such as private gardens, public parks, sports fields, and golf courses, which account for another 14% of Jersey's land mass.\n"],
    [539,56,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","Good sea water quality means much more than having a nice place to swim. It is a habitat for economically and ecologically important species and a critical resource for our fishing and tourism industries.\nThis indicator shows the percentage of 14 survey sites around the Island which overall classify the seawater as 'Excellent'.\nIn 2017 78.6% of the Jersey's bathing waters were classified being of excellent quality.\n\n"],
    [540,56,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","Good sea water quality means much more than having a nice place to swim. It is a habitat for economically and ecologically important species and a critical resource for our fishing and tourism industries.\nThis indicator shows the percentage of 14 survey sites around the Island which overall classify the seawater as 'Excellent'.\nIn 2019 64.3% of the Jersey's bathing waters were classified being of excellent quality.\n\n"],
    [541,56,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","Good sea water quality means much more than having a nice place to swim. It is a habitat for economically and ecologically important species and a critical resource for our fishing and tourism industries.\nThis indicator shows the percentage of 14 survey sites around the Island which overall classify the seawater as 'Excellent'.\nIn 2021 64.3% of the Jersey's bathing waters were classified being of excellent quality.\n\n"],
    [542,58,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","This data shows the area (in hectares) of the largest intertidal seagrass (Zostera noltii) bed in St Aubin’s Bay. The measurement is made annually from the Government of Jersey’s aerial Island-wide photo, although some years the nature of the photo means that the area cannot be captured. There are two other areas for which seagrass data is collected (Grouville Bay and St Catherine’s Bay) but the St Aubin's site provides the most regular and reliable data.\nSeagrass is a marine plant which is sensitive to disturbance and changes in the local environment relating to salinity, sea chemistry light and nutrients. For this reason, seagrass is widely used as an indicator of coastal water quality and general environmental quality. Seagrass also plays an important role in local and global carbon budgets through the storage of carbon in its root systems.\nIn 2012 the abundance of and indicator species (area of seagrass beds in Jersey marine environment) was 81 hectares.\n\n"],
    [543,58,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","This data shows the area (in hectares) of the largest intertidal seagrass (Zostera noltii) bed in St Aubin’s Bay. The measurement is made annually from the Government of Jersey’s aerial Island-wide photo, although some years the nature of the photo means that the area cannot be captured. There are two other areas for which seagrass data is collected (Grouville Bay and St Catherine’s Bay) but the St Aubin's site provides the most regular and reliable data.\nSeagrass is a marine plant which is sensitive to disturbance and changes in the local environment relating to salinity, sea chemistry light and nutrients. For this reason, seagrass is widely used as an indicator of coastal water quality and general environmental quality. Seagrass also plays an important role in local and global carbon budgets through the storage of carbon in its root systems.\nIn 2013 the abundance of and indicator species (area of seagrass beds in Jersey marine environment) was 80 hectares.\n\n"],
    [544,58,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","This data shows the area (in hectares) of the largest intertidal seagrass (Zostera noltii) bed in St Aubin’s Bay. The measurement is made annually from the Government of Jersey’s aerial Island-wide photo, although some years the nature of the photo means that the area cannot be captured. There are two other areas for which seagrass data is collected (Grouville Bay and St Catherine’s Bay) but the St Aubin's site provides the most regular and reliable data.\nSeagrass is a marine plant which is sensitive to disturbance and changes in the local environment relating to salinity, sea chemistry light and nutrients. For this reason, seagrass is widely used as an indicator of coastal water quality and general environmental quality. Seagrass also plays an important role in local and global carbon budgets through the storage of carbon in its root systems.\nIn 2015 the abundance of and indicator species (area of seagrass beds in Jersey marine environment) was 87 hectares.\n\n"],
    [545,58,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","This data shows the area (in hectares) of the largest intertidal seagrass (Zostera noltii) bed in St Aubin’s Bay. The measurement is made annually from the Government of Jersey’s aerial Island-wide photo, although some years the nature of the photo means that the area cannot be captured. There are two other areas for which seagrass data is collected (Grouville Bay and St Catherine’s Bay) but the St Aubin's site provides the most regular and reliable data.\nSeagrass is a marine plant which is sensitive to disturbance and changes in the local environment relating to salinity, sea chemistry light and nutrients. For this reason, seagrass is widely used as an indicator of coastal water quality and general environmental quality. Seagrass also plays an important role in local and global carbon budgets through the storage of carbon in its root systems.\nIn 2016 the abundance of and indicator species (area of seagrass beds in Jersey marine environment) was 83 hectares.\n\n"],
    [546,58,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","This data shows the area (in hectares) of the largest intertidal seagrass (Zostera noltii) bed in St Aubin’s Bay. The measurement is made annually from the Government of Jersey’s aerial Island-wide photo, although some years the nature of the photo means that the area cannot be captured. There are two other areas for which seagrass data is collected (Grouville Bay and St Catherine’s Bay) but the St Aubin's site provides the most regular and reliable data.\nSeagrass is a marine plant which is sensitive to disturbance and changes in the local environment relating to salinity, sea chemistry light and nutrients. For this reason, seagrass is widely used as an indicator of coastal water quality and general environmental quality. Seagrass also plays an important role in local and global carbon budgets through the storage of carbon in its root systems.\nIn 2018 the abundance of and indicator species (area of seagrass beds in Jersey marine environment) was 91 hectares.\n\n"],
    [547,58,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","This data shows the area (in hectares) of the largest intertidal seagrass (Zostera noltii) bed in St Aubin’s Bay. The measurement is made annually from the Government of Jersey’s aerial Island-wide photo, although some years the nature of the photo means that the area cannot be captured. There are two other areas for which seagrass data is collected (Grouville Bay and St Catherine’s Bay) but the St Aubin's site provides the most regular and reliable data.\nSeagrass is a marine plant which is sensitive to disturbance and changes in the local environment relating to salinity, sea chemistry light and nutrients. For this reason, seagrass is widely used as an indicator of coastal water quality and general environmental quality. Seagrass also plays an important role in local and global carbon budgets through the storage of carbon in its root systems.\nIn 2019 the abundance of and indicator species (area of seagrass beds in Jersey marine environment) was 91 hectares.\n\n"],
    [548,58,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","This data shows the area (in hectares) of the largest intertidal seagrass (Zostera noltii) bed in St Aubin’s Bay. The measurement is made annually from the Government of Jersey’s aerial Island-wide photo, although some years the nature of the photo means that the area cannot be captured. There are two other areas for which seagrass data is collected (Grouville Bay and St Catherine’s Bay) but the St Aubin's site provides the most regular and reliable data.\nSeagrass is a marine plant which is sensitive to disturbance and changes in the local environment relating to salinity, sea chemistry light and nutrients. For this reason, seagrass is widely used as an indicator of coastal water quality and general environmental quality. Seagrass also plays an important role in local and global carbon budgets through the storage of carbon in its root systems.\nIn 2021 the abundance of and indicator species (area of seagrass beds in Jersey marine environment) was 90 hectares.\n\n"],
    [549,61,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","The sustainable use of Jersey's water resources is essential to individual and community wellbeing, and for the protection of biodiversity and ecological systems. Islanders' water supplies rely largely on rainfall-dependent surface water, which is captured and stored in six main reservoirs. When full, they can provide about 120 days supply, based on current average daily demand. A desalination plant can boost this supply when rainfall levels are low, but can only meet about 50% of daily demand. Managing future demand will be essential and this indicator tracks the overall consumption of treated mains water per head of population. \nWater consumption per capita has increased from 64.80 in 2023 to 68.10.\nFigures were adjusted slightly in October 2024 to account for updated population estimates.\n\n"],
    [550,61,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","The sustainable use of Jersey's water resources is essential to individual and community wellbeing, and for the protection of biodiversity and ecological systems. Islanders' water supplies rely largely on rainfall-dependent surface water, which is captured and stored in six main reservoirs. When full, they can provide about 120 days supply, based on current average daily demand. A desalination plant can boost this supply when rainfall levels are low, but can only meet about 50% of daily demand. Managing future demand will be essential and this indicator tracks the overall consumption of treated mains water per head of population. \nWater consumption per capita has reduced steadily from the 2011 rate of 73.4 thousand litres per capita to 71.4 thousand litres per capita in 2012.\n\n"],
    [551,61,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","The sustainable use of Jersey's water resources is essential to individual and community wellbeing, and for the protection of biodiversity and ecological systems. Islanders' water supplies rely largely on rainfall-dependent surface water, which is captured and stored in six main reservoirs. When full, they can provide about 120 days supply, based on current average daily demand. A desalination plant can boost this supply when rainfall levels are low, but can only meet about 50% of daily demand. Managing future demand will be essential and this indicator tracks the overall consumption of treated mains water per head of population. \nWater consumption per capita has reduced steadily from the 2011 rate of 73.4 thousand litres per capita to 71.2 thousand litres per capita in 2013.\n\n"],
    [552,61,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","The sustainable use of Jersey's water resources is essential to individual and community wellbeing, and for the protection of biodiversity and ecological systems. Islanders' water supplies rely largely on rainfall-dependent surface water, which is captured and stored in six main reservoirs. When full, they can provide about 120 days supply, based on current average daily demand. A desalination plant can boost this supply when rainfall levels are low, but can only meet about 50% of daily demand. Managing future demand will be essential and this indicator tracks the overall consumption of treated mains water per head of population. \nWater consumption per capita has increased steadily from the 2013 rate of 71.2 thousand litres per capita to 72.3 thousand litres per capita in 2015.\n\n"],
    [553,61,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","The sustainable use of Jersey's water resources is essential to individual and community wellbeing, and for the protection of biodiversity and ecological systems. Islanders' water supplies rely largely on rainfall-dependent surface water, which is captured and stored in six main reservoirs. When full, they can provide about 120 days supply, based on current average daily demand. A desalination plant can boost this supply when rainfall levels are low, but can only meet about 50% of daily demand. Managing future demand will be essential and this indicator tracks the overall consumption of treated mains water per head of population. \nWater consumption per capita has increased steadily from the 2014 rate of 71.0 thousand litres per capita to 73.7 thousand litres per capita in 2016.\n\n"],
    [554,61,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","The sustainable use of Jersey's water resources is essential to individual and community wellbeing, and for the protection of biodiversity and ecological systems. Islanders' water supplies rely largely on rainfall-dependent surface water, which is captured and stored in six main reservoirs. When full, they can provide about 120 days supply, based on current average daily demand. A desalination plant can boost this supply when rainfall levels are low, but can only meet about 50% of daily demand. Managing future demand will be essential and this indicator tracks the overall consumption of treated mains water per head of population. \nWater consumption per capita has reduced steadily from the 2016 rate of 73.7 thousand litres per capita to 69.5 thousand litres per capita in 2018.\n\n"],
    [555,61,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","The sustainable use of Jersey's water resources is essential to individual and community wellbeing, and for the protection of biodiversity and ecological systems. Islanders' water supplies rely largely on rainfall-dependent surface water, which is captured and stored in six main reservoirs. When full, they can provide about 120 days supply, based on current average daily demand. A desalination plant can boost this supply when rainfall levels are low, but can only meet about 50% of daily demand. Managing future demand will be essential and this indicator tracks the overall consumption of treated mains water per head of population. \nWater consumption per capita has reduced considerably from the 2016 rate of 73.7 thousand litres per capita to 67.3 thousand litres per capita in 2019.\n\n"],
    [556,61,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","The sustainable use of Jersey's water resources is essential to individual and community wellbeing, and for the protection of biodiversity and ecological systems. Islanders' water supplies rely largely on rainfall-dependent surface water, which is captured and stored in six main reservoirs. When full, they can provide about 120 days supply, based on current average daily demand. A desalination plant can boost this supply when rainfall levels are low, but can only meet about 50% of daily demand. Managing future demand will be essential and this indicator tracks the overall consumption of treated mains water per head of population. \nWater consumption per capita has reduced from the 2018 rate of 69.5 thousand litres per capita to 66.9 thousand litres per capita in 2021.\n\n"],
    [557,62,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","In 2022 a new method of analysing and reporting waste and recycling was introduced which follows a waste hierarchy. This prioritises (non-inert) waste prevention and reduction before considering reuse, recycling and recovery. \nA time series using this methodology has been calculated back to 2015 (the start of this data series). In line with the waste hierarchy model, this indicator tracks the total (non-inert) waste per capita.\nIn 2016 the total non-inert waste produced per capita was 1.19T.\n\n\n"],
    [558,62,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","In 2022 a new method of analysing and reporting waste and recycling was introduced which follows a waste hierarchy. This prioritises (non-inert) waste prevention and reduction before considering reuse, recycling and recovery. \nA time series using this methodology has been calculated back to 2015 (the start of this data series). In line with the waste hierarchy model, this indicator tracks the total (non-inert) waste per capita.\nIn 2017 the total non-inert waste produced per capita was 1.16T.\n\n\n"],
    [559,62,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","In 2022 a new method of analysing and reporting waste and recycling was introduced which follows a waste hierarchy. This prioritises (non-inert) waste prevention and reduction before considering reuse, recycling and recovery. \nA time series using this methodology has been calculated back to 2015 (the start of this data series). In line with the waste hierarchy model, this indicator tracks the total (non-inert) waste per capita.\nIn 2018 the total non-inert waste produced per capita was 1.10T.\n\n\n"],
    [560,62,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","In 2022 a new method of analysing and reporting waste and recycling was introduced which follows a waste hierarchy. This prioritises (non-inert) waste prevention and reduction before considering reuse, recycling and recovery. \nA time series using this methodology has been calculated back to 2015 (the start of this data series). In line with the waste hierarchy model, this indicator tracks the total (non-inert) waste per capita.\nIn 2019 the total non-inert waste produced per capita was 1.09T.\n\n\n"],
    [561,62,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","In 2022 a new method of analysing and reporting waste and recycling was introduced which follows a waste hierarchy. This prioritises (non-inert) waste prevention and reduction before considering reuse, recycling and recovery. \nA time series using this methodology has been calculated back to 2015 (the start of this data series). In line with the waste hierarchy model, this indicator tracks the total (non-inert) waste per capita.\nIn 2020 the total non-inert waste produced per capita was 1.06T.\n\n\n"],
    [562,62,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","In 2022 a new method of analysing and reporting waste and recycling was introduced which follows a waste hierarchy. This prioritises (non-inert) waste prevention and reduction before considering reuse, recycling and recovery. \nA time series using this methodology has been calculated back to 2015 (the start of this data series). In line with the waste hierarchy model, this indicator tracks the total (non-inert) waste per capita.\nIn 2021 the total non-inert waste produced per capita was 1.09T.\n\n\n"],
    [563,62,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","In 2022 a new method of analysing and reporting waste and recycling was introduced which follows a waste hierarchy. This prioritises (non-inert) waste prevention and reduction before considering reuse, recycling and recovery. \nA time series using this methodology has been calculated back to 2015 (the start of this data series). In line with the waste hierarchy model, this indicator tracks the total (non-inert) waste per capita.\nIn 2022 the total non-inert waste produced per capita was 1.05T.\n\n\n"],
    [564,62,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","In 2022 a new method of analysing and reporting waste and recycling was introduced which follows a waste hierarchy. This prioritises (non-inert) waste prevention and reduction before considering reuse, recycling and recovery. \nA time series using this methodology has been calculated back to 2015 (the start of this data series). In line with the waste hierarchy model, this indicator tracks the total (non-inert) waste per capita.\nIn 2024 the total non-inert waste produced per capita was 1.09T.\n\n\n"],
    [565,63,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator measures Jersey's energy consumption in tonnes of oil equivalent (toe) which represents the quantity of energy released by burning one tonne of crude oil. More efficient energy use will help to protect households and businesses from the impact of increasing international energy prices, as well as reducing Jersey’s greenhouse gas emissions. \nIn 2012, final energy consumption per person in Jersey has remained unchanged  since 2011 - 1.62 tonnes.\n\n"],
    [566,63,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator measures Jersey's energy consumption in tonnes of oil equivalent (toe) which represents the quantity of energy released by burning one tonne of crude oil. More efficient energy use will help to protect households and businesses from the impact of increasing international energy prices, as well as reducing Jersey’s greenhouse gas emissions. \nIn 2013, final energy consumption per person in Jersey has remained unchanged  since 2011 - 1.62 tonnes.\n\n"],
    [567,63,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator measures Jersey's energy consumption in tonnes of oil equivalent (toe) which represents the quantity of energy released by burning one tonne of crude oil. More efficient energy use will help to protect households and businesses from the impact of increasing international energy prices, as well as reducing Jersey’s greenhouse gas emissions. \nIn 2015, final energy consumption per person in Jersey decreased from 1.62 tonnes of oil in 2013 to 1.52 tonnes.\nPlease note that from 2015 the mid-year population estimates (from the Population & Migration Statistics Report 2011-2022) have been used to calculate this measure.\n\n"],
    [568,63,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator measures Jersey's energy consumption in tonnes of oil equivalent (toe) which represents the quantity of energy released by burning one tonne of crude oil. More efficient energy use will help to protect households and businesses from the impact of increasing international energy prices, as well as reducing Jersey’s greenhouse gas emissions. \nIn 2016, final energy consumption per person in Jersey decreased from 1.62 tonnes of oil in 2013 to 1.51 tonnes.\nPlease note that from 2015 the mid-year population estimates (from the Population & Migration Statistics Report 2011-2022) have been used to calculate this measure.\n\n"],
    [569,63,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator measures Jersey's energy consumption in tonnes of oil equivalent (toe) which represents the quantity of energy released by burning one tonne of crude oil. More efficient energy use will help to protect households and businesses from the impact of increasing international energy prices, as well as reducing Jersey’s greenhouse gas emissions. \nIn 2018, final energy consumption per person in Jersey has decreased slightly from 1.52 in 2015 to 1.48.\nPlease note that from 2015 the mid-year population estimates (from the Population & Migration Statistics Report 2011-2022) have been used to calculate this measure.\n\n"],
    [570,63,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator measures Jersey's energy consumption in tonnes of oil equivalent (toe) which represents the quantity of energy released by burning one tonne of crude oil. More efficient energy use will help to protect households and businesses from the impact of increasing international energy prices, as well as reducing Jersey’s greenhouse gas emissions. \nIn 2019, final energy consumption per person in Jersey has been steadily decreasing over the last 3 years, from 1.51 in 2016 to 1.44.\nPlease note that from 2015 the mid-year population estimates (from the Population & Migration Statistics Report 2011-2022) have been used to calculate this measure.\n\n"],
    [571,63,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator measures Jersey's energy consumption in tonnes of oil equivalent (toe) which represents the quantity of energy released by burning one tonne of crude oil. More efficient energy use will help to protect households and businesses from the impact of increasing international energy prices, as well as reducing Jersey’s greenhouse gas emissions. \nIn 2021, final energy consumption per person in Jersey has increased from 1.30 in 2020 to 1.38.\nPlease note that from 2015 the mid-year population estimates (from the Population & Migration Statistics Report 2011-2022) have been used to calculate this measure.\n\n"],
    [572,63,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator measures Jersey's energy consumption in tonnes of oil equivalent (toe) which represents the quantity of energy released by burning one tonne of crude oil. More efficient energy use will help to protect households and businesses from the impact of increasing international energy prices, as well as reducing Jersey’s greenhouse gas emissions. \nIn 2023, final energy consumption per person in Jersey has slighlty decreased from 1.30 in 2020 to 1.29.\nPlease note that from 2015 the mid-year population estimates (from the Population & Migration Statistics Report 2011-2022) have been used to calculate this measure.\n\n"],
    [573,64,"2008-12-31T00:00:00","In March 2007, the UK's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol was extended to Jersey. The protocol requires Jersey to reduce its carbon emissions by 80% by 2050, relative to 1990 levels. This indicator tracks Jersey's performance in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), measured in kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (ktCOe). Please note that all back series have been updated due to methodology improvements made in line with the international best practice.\nIn 2008 Jersey’s emission level of greenhouse gases decreased from 572.0 ktCOe in 2007 to 524.0 ktCOe.\n\n"],
    [574,64,"2009-12-31T00:00:00","In March 2007, the UK's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol was extended to Jersey. The protocol requires Jersey to reduce its carbon emissions by 80% by 2050, relative to 1990 levels. This indicator tracks Jersey's performance in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), measured in kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (ktCOe). Please note that all back series have been updated due to methodology improvements made in line with the international best practice.\nIn 2009 Jersey’s emission level of greenhouse gases decreased from 572.0 ktCOe in 2007 to 507.0 ktCOe.\n\n"],
    [575,64,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","In March 2007, the UK's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol was extended to Jersey. The protocol requires Jersey to reduce its carbon emissions by 80% by 2050, relative to 1990 levels. This indicator tracks Jersey's performance in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), measured in kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (ktCOe). Please note that all back series have been updated due to methodology improvements made in line with the international best practice.\nIn 2011 Jersey’s emission level of greenhouse gases decreased from 524.0 ktCOe in 2008 to 452.0 ktCOe.\n\n"],
    [576,64,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","In March 2007, the UK's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol was extended to Jersey. The protocol requires Jersey to reduce its carbon emissions by 80% by 2050, relative to 1990 levels. This indicator tracks Jersey's performance in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), measured in kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (ktCOe). Please note that all back series have been updated due to methodology improvements made in line with the international best practice.\nIn 2012 Jersey’s emission level of greenhouse gases increased back to a similar level as in 2010 - 505.0 ktCOe.\n\n"],
    [577,64,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","In March 2007, the UK's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol was extended to Jersey. The protocol requires Jersey to reduce its carbon emissions by 80% by 2050, relative to 1990 levels. This indicator tracks Jersey's performance in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), measured in kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (ktCOe). Please note that all back series have been updated due to methodology improvements made in line with the international best practice.\nIn 2014 Jersey’s emission level of greenhouse gases decreased from 505.0 ktCOe in 2012 to 469.0 ktCOe.\n\n"],
    [578,64,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","In March 2007, the UK's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol was extended to Jersey. The protocol requires Jersey to reduce its carbon emissions by 80% by 2050, relative to 1990 levels. This indicator tracks Jersey's performance in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), measured in kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (ktCOe). Please note that all back series have been updated due to methodology improvements made in line with the international best practice.\nIn 2015 Jersey’s emission level of greenhouse gases decreased from 543.0 ktCOe in 2013 to 431.0 ktCOe.\n\n"],
    [579,64,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","In March 2007, the UK's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol was extended to Jersey. The protocol requires Jersey to reduce its carbon emissions by 80% by 2050, relative to 1990 levels. This indicator tracks Jersey's performance in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), measured in kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (ktCOe). Please note that all back series have been updated due to methodology improvements made in line with the international best practice.\nIn 2017 Jersey’s emission level of greenhouse gases decreased from 469.0 ktCOe in 2014 to 445.0 ktCOe.\n\n"],
    [580,64,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","In March 2007, the UK's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol was extended to Jersey. The protocol requires Jersey to reduce its carbon emissions by 80% by 2050, relative to 1990 levels. This indicator tracks Jersey's performance in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), measured in kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (ktCOe). Please note that all back series have been updated due to methodology improvements made in line with the international best practice.\nIn 2018 Jersey’s emission level of greenhouse gases decreased steadily from 454.0 ktCOe in 2016 to 433.0 ktCOe.\n\n"],
    [581,64,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","In March 2007, the UK's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol was extended to Jersey. The protocol requires Jersey to reduce its carbon emissions by 80% by 2050, relative to 1990 levels. This indicator tracks Jersey's performance in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), measured in kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (ktCOe). Please note that all back series have been updated due to methodology improvements made in line with the international best practice.\nIn 2020 Jersey’s emission level of greenhouse gases decreased significantly from 445.0 ktCOe in 2017 to 354.0 ktCOe.\n\n"],
    [582,64,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","In March 2007, the UK's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol was extended to Jersey. The protocol requires Jersey to reduce its carbon emissions by 80% by 2050, relative to 1990 levels. This indicator tracks Jersey's performance in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), measured in kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (ktCOe). Please note that all back series have been updated due to methodology improvements made in line with the international best practice.\nIn 2022 Jersey’s emission level of greenhouse gases decreased from 417.0 ktCOe in 2019 to 358.0 ktCOe.\n\n"],
    [583,65,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","Combustion processes emit a mixture of oxides of nitrogen - NO and NO2 - collectively termed NOx. \nNO2 can have a wide range of effects on human health, dependent on exposure times and concentrations. Short-term exposure can inflame and irritate airways. In addition, exposure can lead to reduced lung function and increased risk of respiratory illnesses, especially childhood asthma. NO2 is also involved in the formation of photochemical smog and acid rain and may cause damage to crops and vegetation.\nThe EC directive limit (and Jersey's 2013 Air Quality Strategy objective) for the annual mean NO2 concentration is 40 g m3. The NO2 concentration has increased from 29 g m3 in 2013 to 31 g m3 in 2014.\n\n"],
    [584,65,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","Combustion processes emit a mixture of oxides of nitrogen - NO and NO2 - collectively termed NOx. \nNO2 can have a wide range of effects on human health, dependent on exposure times and concentrations. Short-term exposure can inflame and irritate airways. In addition, exposure can lead to reduced lung function and increased risk of respiratory illnesses, especially childhood asthma. NO2 is also involved in the formation of photochemical smog and acid rain and may cause damage to crops and vegetation.\nThe EC directive limit (and Jersey's 2013 Air Quality Strategy objective) for the annual mean NO2 concentration is 40 g m3. The NO2 concentration has decreased from 29 g m3 in 2013 to 27 g m3 in 2015.\n\n"],
    [585,65,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","Combustion processes emit a mixture of oxides of nitrogen - NO and NO2 - collectively termed NOx. \nNO2 can have a wide range of effects on human health, dependent on exposure times and concentrations. Short-term exposure can inflame and irritate airways. In addition, exposure can lead to reduced lung function and increased risk of respiratory illnesses, especially childhood asthma. NO2 is also involved in the formation of photochemical smog and acid rain and may cause damage to crops and vegetation.\nThe EC directive limit (and Jersey's 2013 Air Quality Strategy objective) for the annual mean NO2 concentration is 40 g m3. The NO2 concentration has decreased from 31 g m3 in 2014 to 27 g m3 in 2016.\n\n"],
    [586,65,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","Combustion processes emit a mixture of oxides of nitrogen - NO and NO2 - collectively termed NOx. \nNO2 can have a wide range of effects on human health, dependent on exposure times and concentrations. Short-term exposure can inflame and irritate airways. In addition, exposure can lead to reduced lung function and increased risk of respiratory illnesses, especially childhood asthma. NO2 is also involved in the formation of photochemical smog and acid rain and may cause damage to crops and vegetation.\nThe EC directive limit (and Jersey's 2013 Air Quality Strategy objective) for the annual mean NO2 concentration is 40 g m3. The NO2 concentration has been decreasing steadily from 27 g m3 in 2015 to 21 g m3 in 2018.\n\n"],
    [587,65,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","Combustion processes emit a mixture of oxides of nitrogen - NO and NO2 - collectively termed NOx. \nNO2 can have a wide range of effects on human health, dependent on exposure times and concentrations. Short-term exposure can inflame and irritate airways. In addition, exposure can lead to reduced lung function and increased risk of respiratory illnesses, especially childhood asthma. NO2 is also involved in the formation of photochemical smog and acid rain and may cause damage to crops and vegetation.\nThe EC directive limit (and Jersey's 2013 Air Quality Strategy objective) for the annual mean NO2 concentration is 40 g m3. The NO2 concentration has been decreasing steadily from 27 g m3 in 2016 to 22 g m3 in 2019.\n\n"],
    [588,65,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","Combustion processes emit a mixture of oxides of nitrogen - NO and NO2 - collectively termed NOx. \nNO2 can have a wide range of effects on human health, dependent on exposure times and concentrations. Short-term exposure can inflame and irritate airways. In addition, exposure can lead to reduced lung function and increased risk of respiratory illnesses, especially childhood asthma. NO2 is also involved in the formation of photochemical smog and acid rain and may cause damage to crops and vegetation.\nThe EC directive limit (and Jersey's 2013 Air Quality Strategy objective) for the annual mean NO2 concentration is 40 g m3. The NO2 concentration has been decreasing steadily from 24 g m3 in 2017 to 19 g m3 in 2020.\n\n"],
    [589,66,"2003-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have decreased from 61.7 mg/L in 2002 to 58.3 mg/L in 2003.\n\n\n"],
    [590,66,"2004-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have decreased from 61.7 mg/L in 2002 to 55.6 mg/L in 2004.\n\n"],
    [591,66,"2005-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have fallen consistently from a high of 61.7 mg/L in 2002 to 54.5 mg/L in 2005.\n\n\n"],
    [592,66,"2006-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have fallen consistently from a high of 61.7 mg/L in 2002 to 53.4 mg/L in 2006.\n\n\n"],
    [593,66,"2007-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have been essentially unchanged since previous year, remaining at a steady level of circa 53 mg/L in 2007.\n\n\n"],
    [594,66,"2008-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have been essentially unchanged in the past three years, remaining at a steady level of circa 53 mg/L in 2008.\n\n\n"],
    [595,66,"2009-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have been essentially unchanged in the past three years, remaining at a steady level of circa 53 mg/L in 2009.\n\n\n"],
    [596,66,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have slightly decreased from 53.6 mg/L in 2008 to 52.0 mg/L in 2010.\n\n\n"],
    [597,66,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have been essentially unchanged in the past three years, remaining at a steady level of circa 52 mg/L in 2011.\n\n\n"],
    [598,66,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have decreased from 52.8 mg/L in 2009 to 47.9 mg/L in 2012.\n\n\n"],
    [599,66,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have decreased from 52.8 mg/L in 2009 to 47.7 mg/L in 2013.\n\n\n"],
    [600,66,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have decreased from 52.0 mg/L in 2011 to 49.1 mg/L in 2014.\n\n\n"],
    [601,66,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have slightly increased from 47.9 mg/L in 2012 to 49.0 mg/L in 2015.\n\n\n"],
    [602,66,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have decreased from 49.1.0 mg/L in 2014 to 44.4 mg/L in 2017.\n\n\n"],
    [603,66,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have fallen consistently from a high of 61.7 mg/L in 2002 to 43.9 mg/L in 2018.\n\n"],
    [604,66,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have fallen consistently from a high of 61.7 mg/L in 2002 to 41.3 mg/ltr in 2019.\n\n"],
    [605,66,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have fallen consistently from a high of 61.7 mg/L in 2002 to 42.5 mg/L in 2020.\n\n"],
    [606,66,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have fallen consistently from a high of 61.7 mg/L in 2002 to 40.0 mg/L in 2021.\n\n"],
    [607,66,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","Surface water data is collected by Jersey Water over the course of each year from streams and reservoirs within their catchments. Data is weighted by catchment area to provide an Island-wide picture.\nThe limit of nitrates in drinking water according to the European and local standards is 50mg/L.\n\n\nNitrate levels in Jersey's surface water have fallen consistently from a high of 61.7 mg/L in 2002 to 39.7 mg/L in 2022.\n\n"],
    [608,71,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator looks at whether a household with an average net income would be able to afford a median-priced property in Jersey. It does so by looking at the proportion of the required mortgage that the average household could afford to service. A working household with average net income has not been able to afford to service a mortgage on a median-priced house of any size in Jersey since 2002. \nIn 2010 the proportion of the required mortgage that an average household can afford has increased from 85% in 2009 to 89%.\n\n"],
    [609,71,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator looks at whether a household with an average net income would be able to afford a median-priced property in Jersey. It does so by looking at the proportion of the required mortgage that the average household could afford to service. A working household with average net income has not been able to afford to service a mortgage on a median-priced house of any size in Jersey since 2002. \nIn 2011 the proportion of the required mortgage that an average household can afford has increased from 85% in 2009 to 90%.\n\n"],
    [610,71,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator looks at whether a household with an average net income would be able to afford a median-priced property in Jersey. It does so by looking at the proportion of the required mortgage that the average household could afford to service. A working household with average net income has not been able to afford to service a mortgage on a median-priced house of any size in Jersey since 2002. \nIn 2013 the proportion of the required mortgage that an average household can afford has increased from 85% in 2009 to 92%.\n\n"],
    [611,71,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator looks at whether a household with an average net income would be able to afford a median-priced property in Jersey. It does so by looking at the proportion of the required mortgage that the average household could afford to service. A working household with average net income has not been able to afford to service a mortgage on a median-priced house of any size in Jersey since 2002. \nIn 2014 the proportion of the required mortgage that an average household can afford has decreased from 92% in 2012 to 89%.\n\n"],
    [612,71,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator looks at whether a household with an average net income would be able to afford a median-priced property in Jersey. It does so by looking at the proportion of the required mortgage that the average household could afford to service. A working household with average net income has not been able to afford to service a mortgage on a median-priced house of any size in Jersey since 2002. \nIn 2016 the proportion of the required mortgage that an average household can afford has been steadily decreasing from 92% in 2013 to 86%.\n\n"],
    [613,71,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator looks at whether a household with an average net income would be able to afford a median-priced property in Jersey. It does so by looking at the proportion of the required mortgage that the average household could afford to service. A working household with average net income has not been able to afford to service a mortgage on a median-priced house of any size in Jersey since 2002. \nIn 2017 the proportion of the required mortgage that an average household can afford has remained essentially unchaged comparing to the previous year.\n\n"],
    [614,71,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator looks at whether a household with an average net income would be able to afford a median-priced property in Jersey. It does so by looking at the proportion of the required mortgage that the average household could afford to service. A working household with average net income has not been able to afford to service a mortgage on a median-priced house of any size in Jersey since 2002. \nIn 2019 the proportion of the required mortgage that an average household can afford has been steadily decreasing from 87% in 2017 to 81%.\n\n"],
    [615,71,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator looks at whether a household with an average net income would be able to afford a median-priced property in Jersey. It does so by looking at the proportion of the required mortgage that the average household could afford to service. A working household with average net income has not been able to afford to service a mortgage on a median-priced house of any size in Jersey since 2002. \nIn 2020 the proportion of the required mortgage that an average household can afford has been steadily decreasing from 87% in 2017 to 82%.\n\n"],
    [616,71,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator looks at whether a household with an average net income would be able to afford a median-priced property in Jersey. It does so by looking at the proportion of the required mortgage that the average household could afford to service. A working household with average net income has not been able to afford to service a mortgage on a median-priced house of any size in Jersey since 2002. \nIn 2022 the proportion of the required mortgage that an average household can afford decreased considerably from 87% in 2017 to 64% - the lowest since 2009 records.\n\n\n"],
    [617,73,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","As well as considering the evidence on earnings, disposable income and relative low income, it is important to consider people's personal experience of making ends meet. This data is gathered using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS), which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked as a household, how easy or difficult they find it to cope financially and can answer: very easy; quite easy; neither easy nor difficult; quite difficult; or, very difficult. The indicator counts those who respond quite or very difficult as a proportion of total responses. \nThe 2017 result showed a decrease in proportion of Jersey households reporting that they were finding it difficult to cope financially, from 24% in 2010 to 18% in 2017.\n\n"],
    [618,73,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","As well as considering the evidence on earnings, disposable income and relative low income, it is important to consider people's personal experience of making ends meet. This data is gathered using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS), which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked as a household, how easy or difficult they find it to cope financially and can answer: very easy; quite easy; neither easy nor difficult; quite difficult; or, very difficult. The indicator counts those who respond quite or very difficult as a proportion of total responses. \nThe 2022 result showed an increase in proportion of Jersey households reporting that they were finding it difficult to cope financially, from 18% in 2017 to 24% in 2022.\n\n"],
    [619,81,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator, derived from the Jersey Census and Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey, shows the percentage of the Jersey working population that hold a post-secondary school qualification.\nIn 2011, 75.8% of Jersey's workforce held such a qualification, showing a slight increase from 75.3% in 2010.\n\n\n"],
    [620,81,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator, derived from the Jersey Census and Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey, shows the percentage of the Jersey working population that hold a post-secondary school qualification.\nIn 2012, 76.4% of Jersey's workforce held such a qualification, showing a slight increase from 75.3% in 2010.\n\n"],
    [621,81,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator, derived from the Jersey Census and Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey, shows the percentage of the Jersey working population that hold a post-secondary school qualification.\nIn 2013, 78.0% of Jersey's workforce held such a qualification, showing a steady increase from 75.3% in 2010.\n\n\n"],
    [622,81,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator, derived from the Jersey Census and Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey, shows the percentage of the Jersey working population that hold a post-secondary school qualification.\nIn 2014, 79.6% of Jersey's workforce held such a qualification, showing a steady increase from 75.3% in 2010.\n\n\n"],
    [623,81,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator, derived from the Jersey Census and Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey, shows the percentage of the Jersey working population that hold a post-secondary school qualification.\nIn 2015, 80.6% of Jersey's workforce held such a qualification, showing a continuous growth since 2010.\n\n"],
    [624,81,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator, derived from the Jersey Census and Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey, shows the percentage of the Jersey working population that hold a post-secondary school qualification.\nIn 2018, 81.9% of Jersey's workforce held such a qualification. The trend has been showing a steady increase since the records began.\n\n\n"],
    [625,81,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator, derived from the Jersey Census and Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey, shows the percentage of the Jersey working population that hold a post-secondary school qualification.\nIn 2019, 83.6% of Jersey's workforce held such a qualification. The trend has been showing a steady increase since the records began.\n\n\n"],
    [626,81,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator, derived from the Jersey Census and Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey, shows the percentage of the Jersey working population that hold a post-secondary school qualification.\nIn 2020, 83.2% of Jersey's workforce held such a qualification, reaching the highest point since 2010.\n\n\n"],
    [627,83,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","The number of larger businesses is an indicator of a healthy economy; where business start-ups can grow to a stage of increased production and employing multiple staff. \nIn 2011 there were 360 businesses in Jersey employing 20 or more staff; a slight increase from the 350 businesses in 2010.\n\n"],
    [628,83,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","The number of larger businesses is an indicator of a healthy economy; where business start-ups can grow to a stage of increased production and employing multiple staff. \nIn 2012 there were 360 businesses in Jersey employing 20 or more staff; this has remained unchanged comparing to previous year.\n\n"],
    [629,83,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","The number of larger businesses is an indicator of a healthy economy; where business start-ups can grow to a stage of increased production and employing multiple staff. \nIn 2013 there were 390 businesses in Jersey employing 20 or more staff; an increase of 11% from the 350 businesses in 2010.\n\n"],
    [630,83,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","The number of larger businesses is an indicator of a healthy economy; where business start-ups can grow to a stage of increased production and employing multiple staff. \nIn 2014 there were 390 businesses in Jersey employing 20 or more staff; an increase of 8% over the the three years period.\n\n"],
    [631,83,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","The number of larger businesses is an indicator of a healthy economy; where business start-ups can grow to a stage of increased production and employing multiple staff. \nIn 2016 there were 430 businesses in Jersey employing 20 or more staff; an increase of 8% over the the three years period.\n\n"],
    [632,83,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","The number of larger businesses is an indicator of a healthy economy; where business start-ups can grow to a stage of increased production and employing multiple staff. \nIn 2017 there were 440 businesses in Jersey employing 20 or more staff; the trend has been showing a continuous growth since 2010.\n\n"],
    [633,83,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","The number of larger businesses is an indicator of a healthy economy; where business start-ups can grow to a stage of increased production and employing multiple staff. \nIn 2018 there were 460 businesses in Jersey employing 20 or more staff; an increase of 12% over the the three years period.\n\n"],
    [634,83,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","The number of larger businesses is an indicator of a healthy economy; where business start-ups can grow to a stage of increased production and employing multiple staff. \nIn 2019 there were 450 businesses in Jersey employing 20 or more staff; an increase of 20 businesses since 2016, following a slight decrease the previous year.\n\n"],
    [635,83,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","The number of larger businesses is an indicator of a healthy economy; where business start-ups can grow to a stage of increased production and employing multiple staff. \nIn 2021 there were 430 businesses in Jersey employing 20 or more staff; the trend has been showing a consistent decrease since 2018.\n\n"],
    [636,58,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","This data shows the area (in hectares) of the largest intertidal seagrass (Zostera noltii) bed in St Aubin’s Bay. The measurement is made annually from the Government of Jersey’s aerial Island-wide photo, although some years the nature of the photo means that the area cannot be captured. There are two other areas for which seagrass data is collected (Grouville Bay and St Catherine’s Bay) but the St Aubin's site provides the most regular and reliable data. \nSeagrass is a marine plant which is sensitive to disturbance and changes in the local environment relating to salinity, sea chemistry light and nutrients. For this reason, seagrass is widely used as an indicator of coastal water quality and general environmental quality. Seagrass also plays an important role in local and global carbon budgets through the storage of carbon in its root systems.\nIn 2023 the abundance of and indicator species (area of seagrass beds in Jersey marine environment) was 104.4 hectares.\n\n\n"],
    [637,58,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","This data shows the area (in hectares) of the largest intertidal seagrass (Zostera noltii) bed in St Aubin’s Bay. The measurement is made annually from the Government of Jersey’s aerial Island-wide photo, although some years the nature of the photo means that the area cannot be captured. There are two other areas for which seagrass data is collected (Grouville Bay and St Catherine’s Bay) but the St Aubin's site provides the most regular and reliable data. \nSeagrass is a marine plant which is sensitive to disturbance and changes in the local environment relating to salinity, sea chemistry light and nutrients. For this reason, seagrass is widely used as an indicator of coastal water quality and general environmental quality. Seagrass also plays an important role in local and global carbon budgets through the storage of carbon in its root systems.\nIn 2025 the abundance of and indicator species (area of seagrass beds in Jersey marine environment) was 108.4 hectares.\n\n\n"],
    [638,91,"2001-12-31T00:00:00","Increasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\n\nIn 2001, the productivity index decreased from 112.50 in 2000 to 108.30.\n\n"],
    [639,91,"2002-12-31T00:00:00","Increasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2002, the productivity index decreased from 112.50 in 2000 to 104.20.\n"],
    [640,91,"2003-12-31T00:00:00","Increasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2003, the productivity index decreased from 112.50 in 2000 to 100.00, a drop of 11% over the three years period.\n"],
    [641,91,"2005-12-31T00:00:00","Increasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2005, the productivity index was 100.00, which has remained unchanged since 2013.\n"],
    [642,91,"2006-12-31T00:00:00","Increasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2006, the productivity index was 104.20 - a slight increase comparing to the previous two years, leading to reaching the same level as in 2002.\n"],
    [643,91,"2007-12-31T00:00:00","Increasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2007, the productivity index was 105.80 - an increase from 100.00 in 2004.\n"],
    [644,91,"2009-12-31T00:00:00","Increasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2009, the productivity index was 91.70 - a decrease of 13% over the last two years.\n"],
    [645,91,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","Increasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2010, the productivity index was 86.70 - the trend has been showing a consistent decrease since 2007.\n"],
    [646,91,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","Increasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2011, the productivity index was 85.80 - a considerable drop of 19% since 2007 records.\n"],
    [647,91,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","Increasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2013, the productivity index was 82.50 - this has remained steady since previous year, however showing the lowest index mark since 2000`s records.\n"],
    [648,91,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","Increasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2014, the productivity index was 85.00 - showing a slight growth since 2012, reaching a simmilar level as 2011.\n"],
    [649,91,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","Increasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2015, the productivity index was 84.20 - a slight increase of 2% over a three years period.\n"],
    [650,91,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","Increasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2017 the productivity index was 81.70. The trend was showing a gradual decrease from 85.00 in 2014.\n"],
    [651,91,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","Increasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2018 the productivity index was 82.50. Following a few series of insignificant fluctuations, 2018 productivity index was at a similar level as in 2013.\n"],
    [652,91,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","Increasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2019, the productivity index was 85.00 - an increase of 4% since 2017.\n"],
    [653,91,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","Increasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2021, the productivity index was 68.30 - a notable decrease of 20% since 2019.\n"],
    [654,91,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","Increasing the amount the Island can produce per employee (by working smarter, not longer) is the main way to achieve economic growth, improve competitiveness and raise the standard of living. This productivity indicator is calculated by dividing Gross Value Added (GVA) by the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees. The results are shown as an index (based as 100 in 2003) to account for inflation and allow comparisons over time.\nIn 2022, the productivity index saw an increase comparing to the previous year, from 68.30 to 71.80.\n"],
    [655,92,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the traditional aggregate measure of an economy which measures the total market value of all goods and services produced in Jersey. This indicator divides total GDP for a given year by the average population for that year to produce GDP per capita - the value of goods and services produced per person. This series accounts for inflation. All datapoints are shown in terms of the real-term value of the latest data point.\nSince 2012, GDP per capita has remained essentially unchanged.\n\n"],
    [656,92,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the traditional aggregate measure of an economy which measures the total market value of all goods and services produced in Jersey. This indicator divides total GDP for a given year by the average population for that year to produce GDP per capita - the value of goods and services produced per person. This series accounts for inflation. All datapoints are shown in terms of the real-term value of the latest data point.\nSince 2012, GDP per capita has slightly increased from 52.40 to 54.00.\n\n"],
    [657,92,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the traditional aggregate measure of an economy which measures the total market value of all goods and services produced in Jersey. This indicator divides total GDP for a given year by the average population for that year to produce GDP per capita - the value of goods and services produced per person. This series accounts for inflation. All datapoints are shown in terms of the real-term value of the latest data point.\nSince 2014, GDP per capita has remained essentially unchanged.\n\n"],
    [658,92,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the traditional aggregate measure of an economy which measures the total market value of all goods and services produced in Jersey. This indicator divides total GDP for a given year by the average population for that year to produce GDP per capita - the value of goods and services produced per person. This series accounts for inflation. All datapoints are shown in terms of the real-term value of the latest data point.\nThere has been no significant changes in GDP per capita values over a period of three years.\n"],
    [659,92,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the traditional aggregate measure of an economy which measures the total market value of all goods and services produced in Jersey. This indicator divides total GDP for a given year by the average population for that year to produce GDP per capita - the value of goods and services produced per person. This series accounts for inflation. All datapoints are shown in terms of the real-term value of the latest data point.\nSince 2016, GDP per capita saw a steady annual growth, from 53.50 to 55.40.\n"],
    [660,92,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the traditional aggregate measure of an economy which measures the total market value of all goods and services produced in Jersey. This indicator divides total GDP for a given year by the average population for that year to produce GDP per capita - the value of goods and services produced per person. This series accounts for inflation. All datapoints are shown in terms of the real-term value of the latest data point.\nSince 2019, GDP per capita decreased from 55.40 to 49.80.\n"],
    [661,92,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the traditional aggregate measure of an economy which measures the total market value of all goods and services produced in Jersey. This indicator divides total GDP for a given year by the average population for that year to produce GDP per capita - the value of goods and services produced per person. This series accounts for inflation. All datapoints are shown in terms of the real-term value of the latest data point.\nIn 2023, GDP per capita has reached a peak level since 2012 records - 63.50.\n"],
    [662,92,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the traditional aggregate measure of an economy which measures the total market value of all goods and services produced in Jersey. This indicator divides total GDP for a given year by the average population for that year to produce GDP per capita - the value of goods and services produced per person. This series accounts for inflation. All datapoints are shown in terms of the real-term value of the latest data point.\nIn 2024, GDP per capita has continued to grow, reaching an annual value of 65.8.\n"],
    [663,93,"2007-12-31T00:00:00","Earning an adequate wage has a big impact on Islanders' ability to afford a good standard of living. If earnings are growing faster than inflation, it shows that people in work are better off. This indicator tracks the change in mean average earnings in Jersey over time. It is presented as an index set at 100 in 1990 so that the change in the real value of earnings can be compared by allowing for inflation.\nIn 2007, the change in the value of average earnings allowing for the effect of inflation has increased since 2006.\n\n"],
    [664,93,"2008-12-31T00:00:00","Earning an adequate wage has a big impact on Islanders' ability to afford a good standard of living. If earnings are growing faster than inflation, it shows that people in work are better off. This indicator tracks the change in mean average earnings in Jersey over time. It is presented as an index set at 100 in 1990 so that the change in the real value of earnings can be compared by allowing for inflation.\nIn 2008, the change in the value of average earnings allowing for the effect of inflation has decreased since 2006.\n\n"],
    [665,93,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","Earning an adequate wage has a big impact on Islanders' ability to afford a good standard of living. If earnings are growing faster than inflation, it shows that people in work are better off. This indicator tracks the change in mean average earnings in Jersey over time. It is presented as an index set at 100 in 1990 so that the change in the real value of earnings can be compared by allowing for inflation.\nIn 2010, the change in the value of average earnings allowing for the effect of inflation has increased since 2008, back to a similar level as 2007.\n\n"],
    [666,93,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","Earning an adequate wage has a big impact on Islanders' ability to afford a good standard of living. If earnings are growing faster than inflation, it shows that people in work are better off. This indicator tracks the change in mean average earnings in Jersey over time. It is presented as an index set at 100 in 1990 so that the change in the real value of earnings can be compared by allowing for inflation.\nIn 2011, the change in the value of average earnings allowing for the effect of inflation has decreased by 4% since 2009.\n\n"],
    [667,93,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","Earning an adequate wage has a big impact on Islanders' ability to afford a good standard of living. If earnings are growing faster than inflation, it shows that people in work are better off. This indicator tracks the change in mean average earnings in Jersey over time. It is presented as an index set at 100 in 1990 so that the change in the real value of earnings can be compared by allowing for inflation.\nIn 2013, the change in the value of average earnings allowing for the effect of inflation has decreased by 3% since 2010.\n\n"],
    [668,93,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","Earning an adequate wage has a big impact on Islanders' ability to afford a good standard of living. If earnings are growing faster than inflation, it shows that people in work are better off. This indicator tracks the change in mean average earnings in Jersey over time. It is presented as an index set at 100 in 1990 so that the change in the real value of earnings can be compared by allowing for inflation.\nIn 2014, the change in the value of average earnings allowing for the effect of inflation has slightly increased since 2012.\n\n"],
    [669,93,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","Earning an adequate wage has a big impact on Islanders' ability to afford a good standard of living. If earnings are growing faster than inflation, it shows that people in work are better off. This indicator tracks the change in mean average earnings in Jersey over time. It is presented as an index set at 100 in 1990 so that the change in the real value of earnings can be compared by allowing for inflation.\nIn 2016, the change in the value of average earnings allowing for the effect of inflation has been consistently increasing since 2012.\n\n"],
    [670,93,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","Earning an adequate wage has a big impact on Islanders' ability to afford a good standard of living. If earnings are growing faster than inflation, it shows that people in work are better off. This indicator tracks the change in mean average earnings in Jersey over time. It is presented as an index set at 100 in 1990 so that the change in the real value of earnings can be compared by allowing for inflation.\nIn 2017, the change in the value of average earnings allowing for the effect of inflation has remained essentially unchanged since previous year, mainitaining an over 119 mark.\n\n"],
    [671,93,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","Earning an adequate wage has a big impact on Islanders' ability to afford a good standard of living. If earnings are growing faster than inflation, it shows that people in work are better off. This indicator tracks the change in mean average earnings in Jersey over time. It is presented as an index set at 100 in 1990 so that the change in the real value of earnings can be compared by allowing for inflation.\nIn 2019, the change in the value of average earnings allowing for the effect of inflation saw a minor drop since 2017 - down by 1%.\n\n"],
    [672,93,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","Earning an adequate wage has a big impact on Islanders' ability to afford a good standard of living. If earnings are growing faster than inflation, it shows that people in work are better off. This indicator tracks the change in mean average earnings in Jersey over time. It is presented as an index set at 100 in 1990 so that the change in the real value of earnings can be compared by allowing for inflation.\nThe Covid-19 pandemic has inevitably had a significant impact on the 2020 results. The latest annual increase in average earnings in the private sector was the lowest recorded since private sector earnings were first reported separately in 1995, but this was balanced by an exceptionally low inflation rate in June 2020. This was driven by temporary government relief measures (e.g. withdrawal of parking charges).\n\n"],
    [673,93,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","Earning an adequate wage has a big impact on Islanders' ability to afford a good standard of living. If earnings are growing faster than inflation, it shows that people in work are better off. This indicator tracks the change in mean average earnings in Jersey over time. It is presented as an index set at 100 in 1990 so that the change in the real value of earnings can be compared by allowing for inflation.\nIn 2022, the change in the value of average earnings allowing for the effect of inflation saw a decrease since previous year - down by 2%.\n\n"],
    [674,93,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","Earning an adequate wage has a big impact on Islanders' ability to afford a good standard of living. If earnings are growing faster than inflation, it shows that people in work are better off. This indicator tracks the change in mean average earnings in Jersey over time. It is presented as an index set at 100 in 1990 so that the change in the real value of earnings can be compared by allowing for inflation. The Covid-19 pandemic has inevitably had a significant impact on the 2020 results. The latest annual increase in average earnings in the private sector was the lowest recorded since private sector earnings were first reported separately in 1995, but this was balanced by an exceptionally low inflation rate in June 2020. This was driven by temporary government relief measures (e.g. withdrawal of parking charges). \nFollowing two years of small real-term decreases (when inflation outpaced average earnings), Jersey's real terms average earnings index increased by 1.9% between June 2019 and June 2020. Over the longer term, average earnings in Jersey have essentially remained flat in real terms since 2001, with gains made up until 2009 being lost in the subsequent decade.\n\nIn 2025 the change in the value of average earnings allowing for the effect of inflation continued its growth, recovering close to the 2022 level, 117.10."],
    [675,94,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","The strategic reserve is the Government long-term reserve, set up in the mid-1980s to safeguard against a downturn in the economy.\nIn this series, the value of the Strategic Reserve is shown in real terms with the base year being that of the most recent datapoint. This means that the value of every data point will change with the addition of a new data point - as the value of the Strategic Reserve in each previous year is re-based to the year of the latest data point. The RPI(Y) is used to calculate real terms values.\n\n"],
    [676,94,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","The strategic reserve is the Government long-term reserve, set up in the mid-1980s to safeguard against a downturn in the economy.\n\nIn this series, the value of the Strategic Reserve is shown in real terms with the base year being that of the most recent datapoint. This means that the value of every data point will change with the addition of a new data point - as the value of the Strategic Reserve in each previous year is re-based to the year of the latest data point. The RPI(Y) is used to calculate real terms values.\nIn 2011, the Strategic reserve value saw a decrease since previous year - down by 2%.\n\n"],
    [677,94,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","The strategic reserve is the Government long-term reserve, set up in the mid-1980s to safeguard against a downturn in the economy.\nIn this series, the value of the Strategic Reserve is shown in real terms with the base year being that of the most recent datapoint. This means that the value of every data point will change with the addition of a new data point - as the value of the Strategic Reserve in each previous year is re-based to the year of the latest data point. The RPI(Y) is used to calculate real terms values.\nIn 2012, the Strategic reserve value saw an increase since 2010 - up by 4%.\n\n"],
    [678,94,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","The strategic reserve is the Government long-term reserve, set up in the mid-1980s to safeguard against a downturn in the economy.\nIn this series, the value of the Strategic Reserve is shown in real terms with the base year being that of the most recent datapoint. This means that the value of every data point will change with the addition of a new data point - as the value of the Strategic Reserve in each previous year is re-based to the year of the latest data point. The RPI(Y) is used to calculate real terms values.\nIn 2013, the Strategic reserve value saw a notable increase since 2010 - up by 17%.\n\n"],
    [679,94,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","The strategic reserve is the Government long-term reserve, set up in the mid-1980s to safeguard against a downturn in the economy.\nIn this series, the value of the Strategic Reserve is shown in real terms with the base year being that of the most recent datapoint. This means that the value of every data point will change with the addition of a new data point - as the value of the Strategic Reserve in each previous year is re-based to the year of the latest data point. The RPI(Y) is used to calculate real terms values.\nIn 2014, the Strategic reserve value saw a consistent increase since 2010 - reaching the highest level of 1,038.\n\n"],
    [680,94,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","The strategic reserve is the Government long-term reserve, set up in the mid-1980s to safeguard against a downturn in the economy.\nIn this series, the value of the Strategic Reserve is shown in real terms with the base year being that of the most recent datapoint. This means that the value of every data point will change with the addition of a new data point - as the value of the Strategic Reserve in each previous year is re-based to the year of the latest data point. The RPI(Y) is used to calculate real terms values.\nIn 2015, the Strategic reserve value saw a slight decrease from 1,038 in 2014 to 1,010.\n"],
    [681,94,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","The strategic reserve is the Government long-term reserve, set up in the mid-1980s to safeguard against a downturn in the economy.\nIn this series, the value of the Strategic Reserve is shown in real terms with the base year being that of the most recent datapoint. This means that the value of every data point will change with the addition of a new data point - as the value of the Strategic Reserve in each previous year is re-based to the year of the latest data point. The RPI(Y) is used to calculate real terms values.\nIn 2016, the Strategic reserve value saw an increase since previous year, outreaching the 2014's high value of 1,038, by 2%.\n\n"],
    [682,94,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","The strategic reserve is the Government long-term reserve, set up in the mid-1980s to safeguard against a downturn in the economy.\nIn this series, the value of the Strategic Reserve is shown in real terms with the base year being that of the most recent datapoint. This means that the value of every data point will change with the addition of a new data point - as the value of the Strategic Reserve in each previous year is re-based to the year of the latest data point. The RPI(Y) is used to calculate real terms values.\nIn 2017, the Strategic reserve value has remained essentialy unchanged since 2016.\n\n"],
    [683,94,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","The strategic reserve is the Government long-term reserve, set up in the mid-1980s to safeguard against a downturn in the economy.\nIn this series, the value of the Strategic Reserve is shown in real terms with the base year being that of the most recent datapoint. This means that the value of every data point will change with the addition of a new data point - as the value of the Strategic Reserve in each previous year is re-based to the year of the latest data point. The RPI(Y) is used to calculate real terms values.\nIn 2018, the Strategic reserve value has decreased since 2016 - down by 8%.\n\n"],
    [684,94,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","The strategic reserve is the Government long-term reserve, set up in the mid-1980s to safeguard against a downturn in the economy.\nIn this series, the value of the Strategic Reserve is shown in real terms with the base year being that of the most recent datapoint. This means that the value of every data point will change with the addition of a new data point - as the value of the Strategic Reserve in each previous year is re-based to the year of the latest data point. The RPI(Y) is used to calculate real terms values.\nIn 2019, the Strategic reserve value saw an increase since previous year, from 976 in 2018 to 1,069.\n\n"],
    [685,94,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","The strategic reserve is the Government long-term reserve, set up in the mid-1980s to safeguard against a downturn in the economy.\nIn this series, the value of the Strategic Reserve is shown in real terms with the base year being that of the most recent datapoint. This means that the value of every data point will change with the addition of a new data point - as the value of the Strategic Reserve in each previous year is re-based to the year of the latest data point. The RPI(Y) is used to calculate real terms values.\nIn 2020, the Strategic reserve value saw a continuous growth since 2018 - up by 16%.\n\n"],
    [686,94,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","The strategic reserve is the Government long-term reserve, set up in the mid-1980s to safeguard against a downturn in the economy.\nIn this series, the value of the Strategic Reserve is shown in real terms with the base year being that of the most recent datapoint. This means that the value of every data point will change with the addition of a new data point - as the value of the Strategic Reserve in each previous year is re-based to the year of the latest data point. The RPI(Y) is used to calculate real terms values.\nIn 2021, the Strategic reserve value reached the highest level since the entire period of time shown - 1,171.\n\n"],
    [687,94,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","The strategic reserve is the Government long-term reserve, set up in the mid-1980s to safeguard against a downturn in the economy.\n\nIn this series, the value of the Strategic Reserve is shown in real terms with the base year being that of the most recent datapoint. This means that the value of every data point will change with the addition of a new data point - as the value of the Strategic Reserve in each previous year is re-based to the year of the latest data point. The RPI(Y) is used to calculate real terms values.\nIn 2022, the Strategic reserve value has encountered the most substantial drop - down by 10% since previous year.\n\n"],
    [688,94,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","The strategic reserve is the Government long-term reserve, set up in the mid-1980s to safeguard against a downturn in the economy.\nIn this series, the value of the Strategic Reserve is shown in real terms with the base year being that of the most recent datapoint. This means that the value of every data point will change with the addition of a new data point - as the value of the Strategic Reserve in each previous year is re-based to the year of the latest data point. The RPI(Y) is used to calculate real terms values.\nIn 2023, the Strategic reserve value was slighlty below the 2020 level of 1,128, however showing signs of recovery after the previous year's drop.\n\n"],
    [689,94,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","The strategic reserve is the Government long-term reserve, set up in the mid-1980s to safeguard against a downturn in the economy.\nIn this series, the value of the Strategic Reserve is shown in real terms with the base year being that of the most recent datapoint. This means that the value of every data point will change with the addition of a new data point - as the value of the Strategic Reserve in each previous year is re-based to the year of the latest data point. The RPI(Y) is used to calculate real terms values.\nIn 2024, the Strategic reserve value reached the highest level since the entire period of time shown - 1,183.\n\n"],
    [690,96,"2011-12-31T00:00:00","This series represents the growth of Jersey's non-financial business sector. It is important for Jersey to grow its non-financial sector to have a more balanced economy, less reliant on the finance industry. For more information see Statistics Jersey's report: Measuring Jersey's economy GDP and GVA. The data series is an index which adjusts for inflation.\nIn 2011, the GVA growth index has slightly decreased since previous year.\n\n"],
    [691,96,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","This series represents the growth of Jersey's non-financial business sector. It is important for Jersey to grow its non-financial sector to have a more balanced economy, less reliant on the finance industry. For more information see Statistics Jersey's report: Measuring Jersey's economy GDP and GVA. The data series is an index which adjusts for inflation.\nIn 2012, there was a 5% decrease in the annual GVA growth index, since 2010.\n\n"],
    [692,96,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","This series represents the growth of Jersey's non-financial business sector. It is important for Jersey to grow its non-financial sector to have a more balanced economy, less reliant on the finance industry. For more information see Statistics Jersey's report: Measuring Jersey's economy GDP and GVA. The data series is an index which adjusts for inflation.\nIn 2013, the GVA growth index was at a similar level as in 2011.\n\n"],
    [693,96,"2014-12-31T00:00:00","This series represents the growth of Jersey's non-financial business sector. It is important for Jersey to grow its non-financial sector to have a more balanced economy, less reliant on the finance industry. For more information see Statistics Jersey's report: Measuring Jersey's economy GDP and GVA. The data series is an index which adjusts for inflation.\nIn 2014, the GVA growth index saw an increase from 98.30 in 2012 to 101.70.\n\n"],
    [694,96,"2015-12-31T00:00:00","This series represents the growth of Jersey's non-financial business sector. It is important for Jersey to grow its non-financial sector to have a more balanced economy, less reliant on the finance industry. For more information see Statistics Jersey's report: Measuring Jersey's economy GDP and GVA. The data series is an index which adjusts for inflation.\nIn 2015, the GVA growth index saw a consistent increase since 2012 - up by 8%.\n\n"],
    [695,96,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","This series represents the growth of Jersey's non-financial business sector. It is important for Jersey to grow its non-financial sector to have a more balanced economy, less reliant on the finance industry. For more information see Statistics Jersey's report: Measuring Jersey's economy GDP and GVA. The data series is an index which adjusts for inflation.\nIn 2016, the GVA growth index saw a significant increase over a three year period, from 100.00 in 2013, to 109.00.\n\n"],
    [696,96,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","This series represents the growth of Jersey's non-financial business sector. It is important for Jersey to grow its non-financial sector to have a more balanced economy, less reliant on the finance industry. For more information see Statistics Jersey's report: Measuring Jersey's economy GDP and GVA. The data series is an index which adjusts for inflation.\nIn 2017, the GVA growth index increased by 10% since 2014.\n\n"],
    [697,96,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","This series represents the growth of Jersey's non-financial business sector. It is important for Jersey to grow its non-financial sector to have a more balanced economy, less reliant on the finance industry. For more information see Statistics Jersey's report: Measuring Jersey's economy GDP and GVA. The data series is an index which adjusts for inflation.\nIn 2018, the GVA growth index saw a steady increase over the last three years, from 106.40 in 2015 to 113.20.\n\n"],
    [698,96,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","This series represents the growth of Jersey's non-financial business sector. It is important for Jersey to grow its non-financial sector to have a more balanced economy, less reliant on the finance industry. For more information see Statistics Jersey's report: Measuring Jersey's economy GDP and GVA. The data series is an index which adjusts for inflation.\nIn 2019, the GVA growth index has reached the highest level since the entire time period shown - 114.70.\n\n"],
    [699,96,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","This series represents the growth of Jersey's non-financial business sector. It is important for Jersey to grow its non-financial sector to have a more balanced economy, less reliant on the finance industry. For more information see Statistics Jersey's report: Measuring Jersey's economy GDP and GVA. The data series is an index which adjusts for inflation.\nDuring the Covid19 pandemic, the GVA growth index saw a notable drop - nearing the 2014 level; a decrease of 12% from the previous year.\n\n"],
    [700,96,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","This series represents the growth of Jersey's non-financial business sector. It is important for Jersey to grow its non-financial sector to have a more balanced economy, less reliant on the finance industry. For more information see Statistics Jersey's report: Measuring Jersey's economy GDP and GVA. The data series is an index which adjusts for inflation.\nIn 2021, the GVA growth index has recovered from its previous year drop, reaching 116.80 - exceeding the pre-pandemic highest record.\n\n"],
    [701,96,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","This series represents the growth of Jersey's non-financial business sector. It is important for Jersey to grow its non-financial sector to have a more balanced economy, less reliant on the finance industry. For more information see Statistics Jersey's report: Measuring Jersey's economy GDP and GVA. The data series is an index which adjusts for inflation.\nIn 2022, the GVA growth index has remained essentially unchanged since previous year.\n\n"],
    [702,97,"2010-12-31T00:00:00","The business confidence score is taken from Statistics Jersey's Business Tendency Survey (BTS). The score is the difference in the percentage of respodents reporting an increase in future business activity and those reporting a decrease. Consequently a positive score is net optimistic and a negative score net pessimistic in terms of the business environment.\nPlease note that in 2025 this indicator was updated, and it is now reflecting the future business activity instead of the business optimism, due to a change in the survey's related question.\n\nIn 2010 the future business activity score was 2 percentage points.\n"],
    [703,97,"2012-12-31T00:00:00","The business confidence score is taken from Statistics Jersey's Business Tendency Survey (BTS). The score is the difference in the percentage of respodents reporting an increase in future business activity and those reporting a decrease. Consequently a positive score is net optimistic and a negative score net pessimistic in terms of the business environment.\nPlease note that in 2025 this indicator was updated, and it is now reflecting the future business activity instead of the business optimism, due to a change in the survey's related question.\nIn 2012 the  future business activity score has decreased significantly, from 8% in 2009, to -8%.\n\n"],
    [704,97,"2013-12-31T00:00:00","The business confidence score is taken from Statistics Jersey's Business Tendency Survey (BTS). The score is the difference in the percentage of respodents reporting an increase in future business activity and those reporting a decrease. Consequently a positive score is net optimistic and a negative score net pessimistic in terms of the business environment.\nPlease note that in 2025 this indicator was updated, and it is now reflecting the future business activity instead of the business optimism, due to a change in the survey's related question.\nIn 2013 the future business activity has reached a possitive score, first time since 2010, reaching a 6 percentage points score.\n\n"],
    [705,97,"2016-12-31T00:00:00","The business confidence score is taken from Statistics Jersey's Business Tendency Survey (BTS). The score is the difference in the percentage of respodents reporting an increase in future business activity and those reporting a decrease. Consequently a positive score is net optimistic and a negative score net pessimistic in terms of the business environment.\nPlease note that in 2025 this indicator was updated, and it is now reflecting the future business activity instead of the business optimism, due to a change in the survey's related question.\nIn 2016 the future business activity score has remained essentially unchanged since 2014 - 18 percentage points.\n"],
    [706,97,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","The business confidence score is taken from Statistics Jersey's Business Tendency Survey (BTS). The score is the difference in the percentage of respodents reporting an increase in future business activity and those reporting a decrease. Consequently a positive score is net optimistic and a negative score net pessimistic in terms of the business environment.\nPlease note that in 2025 this indicator was updated, and it is now reflecting the future business activity instead of the business optimism, due to a change in the survey's related question.\nIn 2018 the future business activity score was at 20 percentage points. \n"],
    [707,97,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","The business confidence score is taken from Statistics Jersey's Business Tendency Survey (BTS). The score is the difference in the percentage of respodents reporting an increase in future business activity and those reporting a decrease. Consequently a positive score is net optimistic and a negative score net pessimistic in terms of the business environment.\nPlease note that in 2025 this indicator was updated, and it is now reflecting the future business activity instead of the business optimism, due to a change in the survey's related question.\nIn 2020 the future business activity score has shown a considerable drop since 2018, down to -10 percentage points.\n"],
    [708,97,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","The business confidence score is taken from Statistics Jersey's Business Tendency Survey (BTS). The score is the difference in the percentage of respodents reporting an increase in future business activity and those reporting a decrease. Consequently a positive score is net optimistic and a negative score net pessimistic in terms of the business environment.\nPlease note that in 2025 this indicator was updated, and it is now reflecting the future business activity instead of the business optimism, due to a change in the survey's related question.\nIn 2021 the future business activity score has recovered since the previous year, up to 17 percentage points.\n"],
    [709,97,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","The business confidence score is taken from Statistics Jersey's Business Tendency Survey (BTS). The score is the difference in the percentage of respodents reporting an increase in future business activity and those reporting a decrease. Consequently a positive score is net optimistic and a negative score net pessimistic in terms of the business environment.\nPlease note that in 2025 this indicator was updated, and it is now reflecting the future business activity instead of the business optimism, due to a change in the survey's related question.\nIn 2022 the future business activity score was 15 percentage points.\n"],
    [710,12,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","An overview of children aged 2 reaching their development milestones is shown on the chart below. This data is based on 2 year old children's assesment provided by Family Nursing & Home Care.\nIn 2017, 84% of 2 year old children have reached their developmental milestones.\n\n"],
    [711,12,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","An overview of children aged 2 reaching their development milestones is shown on the chart below. This data is based on 2 year old children's assesment provided by Family Nursing & Home Care.\nIn 2018, 85% of 2 year old children have reached their developmental milestones.\n\n"],
    [712,12,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","An overview of children aged 2 reaching their development milestones is shown on the chart below. This data is based on 2 year old children's assesment provided by Family Nursing & Home Care.\nIn 2019, 80% of 2 year old children have reached their developmental milestones - a 5% decrease since 2017.\n\n"],
    [713,12,"2020-12-31T00:00:00","An overview of children aged 2 reaching their development milestones is shown on the chart below. This data is based on 2 year old children's assesment provided by Family Nursing & Home Care.\nIn 2020, 81% of 2 year old children have reached their developmental milestones.\n\n"],
    [714,12,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","An overview of children aged 2 reaching their development milestones is shown on the chart below. This data is based on 2 year old children's assesment provided by Family Nursing & Home Care.\nIn 2021, 80% of 2 year old children have reached their developmental milestones - a slight drop to a similar level as in 2019.\n\n"],
    [715,12,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","An overview of children aged 2 reaching their development milestones is shown on the chart below. This data is based on 2 year old children's assesment provided by Family Nursing & Home Care.\nIn 2022, 80% of 2 year old children have reached their developmental milestones - showing no significant change in the last two years.\n\n"],
    [716,12,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","\nAn overview of children aged 2 reaching their development milestones is shown on the chart below. This data is based on 2 year old children's assesment provided by Family Nursing & Home Care.\n\n\nIn 2023, 83% of 2 year old children have reached their developmental milestones - a 2% increase since 2020.\n\n"],
    [717,51,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly. \n\n\nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall. \n\n\nIn 2023, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 16 species of butterfly) decreased from 162.64 in 2021 to 109.62\n\n"],
    [718,51,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","Given their sensitivity to environmental change, butterflies are recognised as an important barometer for the health of Jersey's ecosystems. Whilst the monitoring of butterfly populations has been carried out in the UK since 1976, Jersey's Butterfly Monitoring Scheme was initiated in 2004. Data is collected by a team of volunteers across 39 sites which cover wildlife, agricultural and urban areas. The counts of butterflies are converted into an annual index of abundance for each species using the national methodology. By giving the count of butterflies in 2004 a value of 100, the subsequent long-term trend in abundance can be monitored over time. Improvements in the modelling technique means that the data is recalibrated regularly. \n\n\nIt is important to note that, by the time Jersey's monitoring programme started, butterflies had been in substantial decline nationally for nearly 30 years. Jersey faces a similar challenge, as shown by the fact that large areas of the Island are now lacking in butterflies, especially in Jersey's interior. Large annual fluctuations in butterfly populations are to be expected, principally in response to weather conditions, so it is important to consider long-term trends not comparisons between years. Jersey is beginning to see a moderate long-term increase in butterfly abundance from the low 2004 base but this is not a consistent picture. There has been an observed increase in semi-natural habitat sites which are managed for their conservation interest, demonstrating that conservation intervention is working. Elsewhere, butterfly populations in urban areas are decreasing and those in agricultural areas are fluctuating but level overall. \n\n\nIn 2024, the abundance of and indicator species (average count of 16 species of butterfly) increased slighlty ( +7%) since the previous year - 118.43.\n\n"],
    [719,13,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","In 2023, we are pleased to report that 62.4% of children achieved expected outcomes at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage in all 17 Early Learning Goals. \nWe have seen a slight decrease overall for the prime areas of learning which is something we need to address in order for children to have a solid foundation on which to build further learning, however a pleasing outcome is a rise in achievement in the specific areas of learning, which includes literacy and maths following a focus on these areas in our training and development plan.\n"],
    [720,13,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","This value is taken from the Early Learning Goals assessment completed in relation to children reaching the end of their Reception year.\n\nIn 2017, 46% of children achieved expected outcomes at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage in all 17 Early Learning Goals.\n"],
    [721,13,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","This value is taken from the Early Learning Goals assessment completed in relation to children reaching the end of their Reception year.\n\nIn 2018, 56.7% of children achieved expected outcomes at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage in all 17 Early Learning Goals.\n"],
    [722,13,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","This value is taken from the Early Learning Goals assessment completed in relation to children reaching the end of their Reception year.\nIn 2019, 60.8% of children achieved expected outcomes at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage in all 17 Early Learning Goals. We have seen a considerable increase since the first records in 2017.\n"],
    [723,13,"2021-12-31T00:00:00","This value is taken from the Early Learning Goals assessment completed in relation to children reaching the end of their Reception year.\nIn 2021, 60.5% of children achieved expected outcomes at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage in all 17 Early Learning Goals. We have seen a considerable increase since the first records in 2017.\n"],
    [724,13,"2022-12-31T00:00:00","This value is taken from the Early Learning Goals assessment completed in relation to children reaching the end of their Reception year.\nIn 2022, 60.7% of children achieved expected outcomes at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage in all 17 Early Learning Goals. This has remained essentially unchanged over a two years period.\n"],
    [725,13,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","In 2024, we are pleased to report that 62% of children achieved expected outcomes at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage in all 17 Early Learning Goals. \nWe have seen a slight decrease overall for the prime areas of learning which is something we need to address in order for children to have a solid foundation on which to build further learning, however a pleasing outcome is a rise in achievement in the specific areas of learning, which includes literacy and maths following a focus on these areas in our training and development plan.\n"],
    [726,13,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","In 2025, we are pleased to report that 64.6% of children achieved expected outcomes at the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage in all 17 Early Learning Goals. \nWe have seen a slight decrease overall for the prime areas of learning which is something we need to address in order for children to have a solid foundation on which to build further learning, however a pleasing outcome is a rise in achievement in the specific areas of learning, which includes literacy and maths following a focus on these areas in our training and development plan.\n"],
    [727,14,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","In line with advice from the Department for Education (DfE) and Ofsted we are not comparing like for like the results from this year to those achieved during and impacted by the changing assessment methodologies used during the pandemic. \n2024 celebrate that 74.5% of GCSE students achieved a standard pass (grade 4) in English and mathematics which is higher than the 65% recorded in 2019, pre-Covid, and this together with our internal analysis reflects an overall positive trajectory for GCSE performance.\n"],
    [728,14,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","In line with advice from the Department for Education (DfE) and Ofsted we are not comparing like for like the results from this year to those achieved during and impacted by the changing assessment methodologies used during the pandemic. \n2023 celebrate that 69.5% of GCSE students achieved a standard pass (grade 4) in English and mathematics which is higher than the 65% recorded in 2019, pre-Covid, and this together with our internal analysis reflects an overall positive trajectory for GCSE performance.\n"],
    [729,14,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","This value is taken from the final GCSE results for pupils completing Year 11 in the academic year. The data associated with this period data point comprises the exam results starting from 2018 to 2019.\nIn 2019, 65% of GCSE students achieved a standard pass (grade 4) in English and mathematics.\n\n"],
    [730,15,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This data for 2024 is slightly below the 34.1 Average Point Score achieved in 2019, the last comparable year (as with GCSE). This cohort entered level three study based on Centre Assessed Grades for GCSEs achieved after experiencing lockdown in Year 10.\nThe impact on progression with the uplift of cohort percentage achieving GCSE mathematics and English of 15% was clear, with our largest ever A level cohort across the island. More pupils with lower average GCSE grades were able to access A level, meaning that average point scores predicted were also lower.  \nThis outcome data reflects that, with those lower attaining pupils being greater in number than higher attaining pupils based on GCSE entry.\n"],
    [731,15,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","This data for 2025 is slightly below the 34.1 Average Point Score achieved in 2019, the last comparable year (as with GCSE). This cohort entered level three study based on Centre Assessed Grades for GCSEs achieved after experiencing lockdown in Year 10.\nThe impact on progression with the uplift of cohort percentage achieving GCSE mathematics and English of 15% was clear, with our largest ever A level cohort across the island. More pupils with lower average GCSE grades were able to access A level, meaning that average point scores predicted were also lower.  \nThis outcome data reflects that, with those lower attaining pupils being greater in number than higher attaining pupils based on GCSE entry.\n"],
    [732,15,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","This data for 2023 is slightly below the 34.1 Average Point Score achieved in 2019, the last comparable year (as with GCSE). This cohort entered level three study based on Centre Assessed Grades for GCSEs achieved after experiencing lockdown in Year 10.\nThe impact on progression with the uplift of cohort percentage achieving GCSE mathematics and English of 15% was clear, with our largest ever A level cohort across the island. More pupils with lower average GCSE grades were able to access A level, meaning that average point scores predicted were also lower.  \nThis outcome data reflects that, with those lower attaining pupils being greater in number than higher attaining pupils based on GCSE entry.\n"],
    [733,15,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","This value is taken from the final KS5 and Level 3 results for pupils completing Year 13 in the academic year.\nIt reflects a sum of the point score of all level 3 qualifications taken during KS5 study by pupils (age 16-18) who are deemed to have completed KS5 study (normally over 2 years, maximum 3 years).\nAverage Point Score achieved in 2017 was 35.00.\n\n\n"],
    [734,15,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","This value is taken from the final KS5 and Level 3 results for pupils completing Year 13 in the academic year.\nIt reflects a sum of the point score of all level 3 qualifications taken during KS5 study by pupils (age 16-18) who are deemed to have completed KS5 study (normally over 2 years, maximum 3 years).\nAverage Point Score achieved in 2018 was 35.6.\n\n"],
    [735,15,"2019-12-31T00:00:00","This value is taken from the final KS5 and Level 3 results for pupils completing Year 13 in the academic year.\nIt reflects a sum of the point score of all level 3 qualifications taken during KS5 study by pupils (age 16-18) who are deemed to have completed KS5 study (normally over 2 years, maximum 3 years).\nAverage Point Score achieved in 2019 was 34.1.\n"],
    [736,18,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This value represents the percentage of people that have a regular hobby or interest and is taken directly from the responses to the Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle survey (JOLS) question: “Overall, how satisfied are you with what you do in your leisure time” \nResponse is a scale of 0 to 10 where zero is ‘not at all’ and ten is ‘completely’.\nIn 2024, 54% of respondents were overall satisfied with their leisure time.\n\n"],
    [737,18,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","This value represents the percentage of people that have a regular hobby or interest and is taken directly from the responses to the Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle survey (JOLS) question: “Overall, how satisfied are you with what you do in your leisure time” \nResponse is a scale of 0 to 10 where zero is ‘not at all’ and ten is ‘completely’.\nIn 2025, 57% of respondents were overall satisfied with their leisure time.\n\n"],
    [738,96,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This series represents the growth of Jersey's non-financial business sector. It is important for Jersey to grow its non-financial sector to have a more balanced economy, less reliant on the finance industry. For more information see Statistics Jersey's report: Measuring Jersey's economy GDP and GVA. The data series is an index which adjusts for inflation.\nIn 2023, the GVA growth index has increased from 116.80 in 2021 to 121.10(revised).\n"],
    [739,96,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","This series represents the growth of Jersey's non-financial business sector. It is important for Jersey to grow its non-financial sector to have a more balanced economy, less reliant on the finance industry. For more information see Statistics Jersey's report: Measuring Jersey's economy GDP and GVA. The data series is an index which adjusts for inflation.\nIn 2024, the GVA growth index has increased from 116.80 in 2021 to 124.90.\n"],
    [740,47,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This value is taken directly from the responses to the Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle survey (JOLS) question: \"As a place to live, how satisfied are you with your parish\"\nThe indicator reflects the percentage of adult respondents who are very satisfied with their parish as a place to live.\nIn 2024, 42% of respondents were very satisfied with their parish.\n"],
    [741,99,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This value is taken directly from the Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle survey (JOLS). Respondents were asked to score their current job between 0 and 10.\nThe indicator’s value reflects high and very high score values (from score 7 and above). \nIn 2024, 74% of respondents were satisfied with their job."],
    [742,99,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","This value is taken directly from the Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle survey (JOLS). Respondents were asked to score their current job between 0 and 10.\nThe indicator’s value reflects high and very high score values (from score 7 and above). \nIn 2025, 75% of respondents were satisfied with their job."],
    [743,22,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how often they smoke cigarettes and are given a range of options from never to daily. This indicator monitors the proportion of adults who currently smoke, either daily or occasionally (not including e-cigarettes).\nOverall, Jersey has seen a significant reduction in the proportion of the population who smoke from 25% in 2005 down to 15% in 2019. The proportion of adults who reported that they had never smoked has also significantly increased over this period, from 45% in 2005 to 53% in 2020. Consistent with the decline in reported smoking, the volume of tobacco imported into Jersey has reduced significantly over time, down by nearly 40% between 2013 and 2019. Imports dropped by over 19% in 2019 alone.\nIn 2024, the proportion of people who reported smoking at least occasionally was 13% - a steady decrease since 2022.\n"],
    [744,22,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked how often they smoke cigarettes and are given a range of options from never to daily. This indicator monitors the proportion of adults who currently smoke, either daily or occasionally (not including e-cigarettes).\nOverall, Jersey has seen a significant reduction in the proportion of the population who smoke from 25% in 2005 down to 15% in 2019. The proportion of adults who reported that they had never smoked has also significantly increased over this period, from 45% in 2005 to 53% in 2020. Consistent with the decline in reported smoking, the volume of tobacco imported into Jersey has reduced significantly over time, down by nearly 40% between 2013 and 2019. Imports dropped by over 19% in 2019 alone.\nIn 2025, the proportion of people who reported smoking at least occasionally was 11% - a steady decrease since 2022.\n"],
    [745,31,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator is used internationally to measure and compare quality of life. The data is gathered from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents score themselves between zero and ten in answer to the question: ‘Overall, how satisfied are you with your life nowadays’, with zero being not at all satisfied and ten being completely satisfied. The indicator counts those who score seven or more as a % of total responses. Before 2017, a different version of the question was used but Jersey's results can now be compared directly with those produced in the UK and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.\nIn 2024, the proportion of adults reporting high levels of life satisfaction was 66% - unchanged since the previous year.\n"],
    [746,32,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","The life experience of people with a disability can be very different from those without a disability. They can face barriers in accessing services that many take for granted, including health, education, employment, and transport. The research for the 2017 Disability Strategy highlighted how such challenges contribute to significant differences in life satisfaction between disabled Islanders and the rest of the population. This indicator uses data from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey, to track how this gap in life satisfaction changes over time. The survey asks respondents to score themselves between 0 to 10 in answer to the question: ‘Overall, how satisfied are you with your life nowadays’, with zero being not at all satisfied and ten being completely satisfied. This indicator focuses on the difference in the percentage of the population with a high life satisfaction (7 to 10) between (a) Islanders with a long-term condition that affects their daily lives and (b) the rest of the population.\nIn 2024 the gap in percentage of disabled islanders reporting high life satisfaction compared to the rest of the population increased from 22.0% in 2022 to 28.0%.\n"],
    [747,33,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked ‘How do you rate the range of cultural events, attractions and activities available in Jersey', and can answer: very good; good; poor; or, very poor. The indicator is calculated by adding the number of very good and good responses, and dividing by the total responses.\nIn 2024, 51% of adults rated Jersey’s cultural events, attractions and activities as good (43%) or very good (8%). This is significantly lower than the proportion of Islanders rating either social and recreational (71%) or sporting events, attractions and activities (68%) as good or very good.\n\n\nYoung people were less likely to rate the existing cultural offer as highly as older people and only 38% of people aged 16 to 34 years rated it as good or very good, compared to 62% of people aged 65+ years.\n"],
    [748,34,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked ‘How do you rate the range of sporting activities and events available in Jersey', and can answer: very good; good; poor; or, very poor. The indicator is calculated by adding the number of very good and good responses, and dividing by the total responses.\nIn 2024, 68% of adults rated Jersey's sporting activies and events as good (51%) or very good (16%). This has reduced considerably over the last 10 years from a high of 90% in 2013.\n"],
    [749,35,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","Volunteering is widely used as a measure of community engagement and social connections because of its importance in increasing social cohesion and improving quality of life. Volunteers create, support and sustain organisations that provide vital services in areas, such as social and health care, help community sport, recreation, arts and culture thrive, and play an integral part in protecting and enhancing Jersey's natural environment. This indicator uses data from the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey.\n\nIn 2023, 43% of respondents reported having done some volunteering in the last 12 months. This is an increase from 2022 when 35% of adults had volunteered. Most frequent volunteering activities were recorded within sport or recreation and other charity organisations.\n"],
    [750,38,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","The Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS) asks a representative sample of Jersey adults to rate their 'trust' in the Government on a scale of 1-10, where 1 is don't trust at all, and 10 is trust completely. This score is a combination of the average JOLS scores for trust in (i) Government Departments and (ii) The States Assembly.\nThe average score of 4.8 in 2024 was a decrease from 5.1 in 2022.\n"],
    [751,39,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Participants are asked 'How do you rate the range of the following leisure activities available in Jersey' and can rate social and recreational activities (bars, restaurants, social clubs, etc) as very good, good, poor or very poor.\n\nIn 2024, 71% of respondents rated Jersey's range of social and recreational activities as good (54%) or very good (17%). This is considerable decrease since 2022 records. In general, a smaller percentage of 16 to 34 year olds rated the leisure activities offered in Jersey as very good compared to older age groups.\n\n"],
    [752,41,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This data was collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents were asked: 'Overall, how satisfied are you with your current housing' and can answer very satisfied; fairly satisfied; not very satisfied; or, not at all satisfied.\nIn 2024, 85% of Islanders were either fairly or very satisfied with their housing; 42% reported being very satisfied, and 43% fairly satisfied. The indicator deliberately focuses on the proportion who report being very satisfied as this provides scope for improvement.\n"],
    [753,42,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked: 'As a place to live, how satisfied are you with your local neighbourhood (within five minutes’ walk of your home)' They can choose from very satisfied; fairly satisfied; not very satisfied; or, not at all satisfied.\nIn 2024, 91% of adults reported being very or fairly satisfied with their neighbourhood, with 46% being very satisfied. This indicator deliberately focuses on tracking change in the very satisfied responses over time.\n\n\n"],
    [754,46,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator rates St Helier as a place to work and visit with data regularly collected in the Jersey Opinion and Lifestyle Survey (JOLS). The indicator is a combination (mean average) of the percentages of JOLS respondents that rate St Helier who report being 'very satisfied' with St Helier as a place to work, and to visit.\nIn 2024, 19% of Islanders were 'very satisfied' with St Helier as a place to work, and 11% were 'very satisfied' with St Helier as a place to visit: averaging 15%.\n\n\n"],
    [755,78,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked if they spend too much, too little or about the right amount of time: at work; with family; with other social contacts; and on hobbies / interests. This indicator measures the percentage of people reporting too little time spent with friends, family or on hobbies / interests.\nIn 2023, the percentage of islanders who felt they had insufficient time for family, friends and leisure activities has remained unchanged since previous year.\n"],
    [756,78,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","This data is collected using the Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey which surveys a representative sample of adults in Jersey. Respondents are asked if they spend too much, too little or about the right amount of time: at work; with family; with other social contacts; and on hobbies / interests. This indicator measures the percentage of people reporting too little time spent with friends, family or on hobbies / interests.\nIn 2025, the percentage of islanders who felt they had insufficient time for family, friends and leisure activities has remained unchanged since 2023 - 75%.\n"],
    [757,57,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This new indicator tracks the extent of the countryside access routes available to the public. The substantial feedback to the public consultation on the 2016 Countryside Access Strategy highlighted the value that Islanders place on such access. It encourages community engagement with the outdoors and raises levels of personal connectivity with the natural world and environmental awareness in its broadest sense. In addition, it provides for people's sporting, recreational and leisure needs.  Jersey has an extensive network of paths across public and private land in some of the Island’s most beautiful landscapes. The paths are used by an estimated 100,000 people a year, including locals and visitors and they help meet wider strategic agendas for improving physical and mental health and wellbeing while adding a significant economic value to our landscape. Access should be, safe, sustainable, and cost effective, with minimal impact on biodiversity. It should also be available to everyone. The strategy aims to improve access for all different user groups by providing multi-user paths, adding new routes, improving connectivity and resilience of the network. \n"],
    [758,57,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","This new indicator tracks the extent of the countryside access routes available to the public. The substantial feedback to the public consultation on the 2016 Countryside Access Strategy highlighted the value that Islanders place on such access. It encourages community engagement with the outdoors and raises levels of personal connectivity with the natural world and environmental awareness in its broadest sense. In addition, it provides for people's sporting, recreational and leisure needs.  Jersey has an extensive network of paths across public and private land in some of the Island’s most beautiful landscapes. The paths are used by an estimated 100,000 people a year, including locals and visitors and they help meet wider strategic agendas for improving physical and mental health and wellbeing while adding a significant economic value to our landscape. Access should be, safe, sustainable, and cost effective, with minimal impact on biodiversity. It should also be available to everyone. The strategy aims to improve access for all different user groups by providing multi-user paths, adding new routes, improving connectivity and resilience of the network. \n"],
    [759,3,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","The number of crimes recorded by the police is widely used internationally to provide an overview of community safety over time. This indicator combines the number of crimes recorded by the police with demographic data to take into account changes in population. It should be noted that police recorded crime statistics can be affected by changes in policing activity and recording practice and by the willingness of victims to report. As such, they can only cover crimes that come to the attention of the police. The headline figures also hides variations both within and across crime types. As such, this indicator is a useful supplement to other indicators on community safety and should invite analysis to understand the reasons behind significant variations over time.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. 2024 saw a slight increase in the rate of crimes recorded by the police, from 30.10, per 1,000 in 2021 to 32.8 in 2024.\n\n\n"],
    [760,3,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","The number of crimes recorded by the police is widely used internationally to provide an overview of community safety over time. This indicator combines the number of crimes recorded by the police with demographic data to take into account changes in population. It should be noted that police recorded crime statistics can be affected by changes in policing activity and recording practice and by the willingness of victims to report. As such, they can only cover crimes that come to the attention of the police. The headline figures also hides variations both within and across crime types. As such, this indicator is a useful supplement to other indicators on community safety and should invite analysis to understand the reasons behind significant variations over time.\nThe indicator is measured per 1,000 population to take into account the effect of a rising population over time. 2025 saw a slight decrease in the rate of crimes recorded by the police, from 32.80, per 1,000 in 2024 to 31.60 in 2025.\n\n\n"],
    [761,28,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","Multi-morbidity is commonly defined as the presence of two or more chronic medical conditions in a patient. These are conditions that currently have no cure, and may be managed with drugs and other treatment. As populations age, the level of multi-morbidity is likely to increase, which will have implications for health and social care provision. GPs record patients with 12 long-term conditions as part of the Jersey Quality Improvement Framework (JQIF). These conditions are a good basis for multi-morbidity analysis and they are agreed amongst clinicians as being important. They are: atrial fibrillation; asthma; coronary heart disease; chronic kidney disease; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; dementia; diabetes; heart failure; hypertension; mental health problems; obesity; stroke and transient ischemic attack. There are now 12 long-term conditions reported (we no longer include Cancer as part of JQIF).\nIn 2024 the percentage of population with 2 or more conditions increased from 12.0% in 2021 to 14.0%.\n"],
    [762,71,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator looks at whether a household with an average net income would be able to afford a median-priced property in Jersey. It does so by looking at the proportion of the required mortgage that the average household could afford to service. A working household with average net income has not been able to afford to service a mortgage on a median-priced house of any size in Jersey since 2002. \n\nOverall housing affordability improved on an annual basis, showing a slight growth from 55% in 2023 to 62%.\n\n\n\n"],
    [763,71,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator looks at whether a household with an average net income would be able to afford a median-priced property in Jersey. It does so by looking at the proportion of the required mortgage that the average household could afford to service. A working household with average net income has not been able to afford to service a mortgage on a median-priced house of any size in Jersey since 2002. \n\nOverall housing affordability improved on an annual basis, showing a growth from 55% in 2023 to 70%, in 2025.\n\n\n\n"],
    [764,55,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator is developed from a model that combines aerial mapping of the Island with data from the planning process. The term green space combines two formal land use categories: land under cultivation; and, natural environment. The latter includes woodlands, dunes, grassland, cliffs and shrub. This indicator divides the total amount of green space by Jersey's total land mass, excluding inland water (e.g. ponds, streams and reservoirs) and inter-tidal areas.   \nIn 2024, 70.5% of the island consisted of land under cultivation or natural habitat. This figure does not include man-made green space such as private gardens, public parks, sports fields, and golf courses, which account for another 14% of Jersey's land mass.\n\n"],
    [765,55,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","This indicator is developed from a model that combines aerial mapping of the Island with data from the planning process. The term green space combines two formal land use categories: land under cultivation; and, natural environment. The latter includes woodlands, dunes, grassland, cliffs and shrub. This indicator divides the total amount of green space by Jersey's total land mass, excluding inland water (e.g. ponds, streams and reservoirs) and inter-tidal areas.   \nIn 2025, 70.5% of the island consisted of land under cultivation or natural habitat. This figure does not include man-made green space such as private gardens, public parks, sports fields, and golf courses, which account for another 14% of Jersey's land mass.\n\n"],
    [766,12,"2024-12-31T00:00:00","An overview of children aged 2 reaching their development milestones is shown on the chart above. This data is based on 2 year old children's assesment provided by Family Nursing & Home Care.\nIn 2024, 84% of 2 year old children have reached their developmental milestones - a 5% increase since 2021.\n"],
    [767,12,"2025-12-31T00:00:00","An overview of children aged 2 reaching their development milestones is shown on the chart above. This data is based on 2 year old children's assesment provided by Family Nursing & Home Care.\nIn 2025, 83% of 2 year old children have reached their developmental milestones - a slight decrease since the previous year.\n"],
    [768,14,"2017-12-31T00:00:00","This value is taken from the final GCSE results for pupils completing Year 11 in the academic year. The data associated with this period data point comprises the exam results starting from 2016 to 2017.\nIn 2017, 65.8% of GCSE students achieved a standard pass (grade 4) in English and mathematics.\n\n\n"],
    [769,14,"2018-12-31T00:00:00","This value is taken from the final GCSE results for pupils completing Year 11 in the academic year. The data associated with this period data point comprises the exam results starting from 2017 to 2018.\nIn 2018, 69.7% of GCSE students achieved a standard pass (grade 4) in English and mathematics.\n\n"],
    [770,64,"2023-12-31T00:00:00","In March 2007, the UK's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol was extended to Jersey. The protocol requires Jersey to reduce its carbon emissions by 80% by 2050, relative to 1990 levels. This indicator tracks Jersey's performance in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), measured in kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (ktCOe). Please note that all back series have been updated due to methodology improvements made in line with the international best practice.\nIn 2023 Jersey’s emission level of greenhouse gases has remained unchanged since the previous year."]
]}